Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Валвентин Стріменко

@twitchenko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,558subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002653072015
TypeChannel
Username@twitchenko
DescriptionТут вся інфа за стріми
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/twitchenko

Growth

12,55812,58612,5728 August 2026 — 12,586 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,574 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,567 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,563 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,558 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 4 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,554–12,590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:2412,558-5
11 Aug 2026, 01:2612,563-4
9 Aug 2026, 22:2312,567-7
8 Aug 2026, 20:5212,574-12
8 Aug 2026, 01:4812,586first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.8%
avg views ÷ 12,558 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,260
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held26 (15 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total123,880
Reactions total2,508
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
192
Videos
21
Links
117

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,291 reactions across 26 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,97031.3%
1,66426.5%
🔥74611.9%
🤣5979.49%
👍4386.96%
❤‍🔥2654.21%
👎1612.56%
🤮1392.21%
😢500.795%
👀440.699%
🗿310.493%
250.397%
😱210.334%
🫡170.27%
🥰160.254%
🌚120.191%
🌭100.159%
🍾80.127%
👏80.127%
💘70.111%
16 further kinds620.986%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,291reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈5,810 views549 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Добрий ранок

😁417🔥56🗿3117🤣11👏5👍4🍌3

9 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC≈1,760 views310 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lebigaaPhoto

⚡️Завтра Орієнтовно в 12:00 старт! 24 години, палатки, рибалка, природа🎧

218🔥73😱7🐳6❤‍🔥2👀2🤡1😢1

8 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC≈6,550 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Запустились https://www.twitch.tv/katka24_community

18🔥5🤮2

8 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈6,520 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @katka24_communityPhoto

❤ Мажорна катка на підході: дим, флешки, клатчі й трохи хаосу — усе, що ти любиш у CS, в одному стрімі Сeh9 сідає в лобі разом із Kostia_klepka, Valentinopradagucci, Харківець та Ницо Потворно🔥 Людина, яка бачила CS ще з часів 1.6, поряд із компанією, від якої не знаєш, чого чекати. Хтось точно вчитиме когось грати, хтось згорить, а глядачі отримають вечір чистого фану 😎 Стрім — 8 серпня (субота) о 19:00 на Twitch

31🔥6👍1🤮1

8 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈6,630 views134 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я вас почув, купую другий Сьогодні з ним побігаю на стрімі катки24, потім розіграю вам Такі справи)

🔥11119🥰4

8 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈6,540 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Йоу, треба порада Який би юсп на розіграш краще: Друкопис мв / сніжна мла фт

👍10227

29 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC≈11,300 views160 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ми перемогли, але якою ціною) Дота тепер тільки під горілкою, обняв, дякую, хто вболівав)

🔥101😁468👍3👎2

29 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC≈10,100 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @katka24_communityPhoto

🎙 Валік байтив, байтив — і добайтився: сьогодні 1 на 1 на міду Ghostik прийняв виклик і обіцяє винести однією рукою 😏 А ще на стрімі буде третій — секретний гість, від якого будуть в шоці усі фанати Dota2. Не пропусти! Сьогодні о 19:00 👉 https://www.twitch.tv/katka24_community 🎁 P.S. А зовсім скоро на каналі — розігруємо аркани Dota2. Не проґав 👀 Здогадуєшся, хто третій? Кидай версії 👇 Приєднатися до комʼюніті |

52🤮22😁7👎3❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC≈7,870 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ахахах) Мене теж дота травмувала, але зі своїми страхами треба боротись, тому…

🤣72👎24👍32❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈7,810 views319 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ви готові до доти? Я вас не чуюююю! Ви готові до дотииии???!!

👎132🤮110🔥3319👍11😨6👀3🤣2

24 Jul 2026, 16:29 UTC≈10,700 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Заходь, давно не бачились, будем обійматись Twitch.tv/valentinopradagucci

56👍2

24 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC≈9,830 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Стрім через 15 хвилин?

  1. Давай 🥹45%
  2. Давай, але мене не буде, ситуація така, сорі🥺61%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25😁4👍3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @twitchenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTCAnonymous Poll1,200 voters approx.

Стрім через 15 хвилин?

  1. Давай 🥹45%
  2. Давай, але мене не буде, ситуація така, сорі🥺61%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,040,274 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Валвентин Стріменко” (@twitchenko), 12,558 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twitchenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.