Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مكتبة ضاد

@twinkling4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

53,963subscribers

+202 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185174002
TypeChannel
Username@twinkling4
Description"إنّ الّذي ملأ اللغات محاسنًا جعلَ الجمالَ وسرّه في الضّاد ←مكتبة ض→
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/twinkling4

Growth

53,76153,96353,8626 August 2026 — 53,761 subscribers6 August 2026 — 53,761 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,807 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,858 subscribers9 August 2026 — 53,896 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,920 subscribers11 August 2026 — 53,937 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,963 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +202. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,731–53,993 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:5853,963+26
11 Aug 2026, 13:4153,937+17
10 Aug 2026, 15:0553,920+24
9 Aug 2026, 14:1653,896+38
8 Aug 2026, 11:3453,858+51
7 Aug 2026, 11:0253,807+46
6 Aug 2026, 17:1553,761no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:4153,761first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 53,963 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,600
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.693%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held22 (14 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total263,920
Reactions total1,829
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
547
Videos
4
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
36s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,829 reactions across 21 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,36874.8%
❤‍🔥723.94%
👍482.62%
🔥442.41%
🍓412.24%
😁331.80%
🤷261.42%
💘241.31%
😎170.929%
👾160.875%
🤔160.875%
🎉140.765%
🗿130.711%
🤷‍♀130.711%
😡90.492%
👀80.437%
💔80.437%
🤬70.383%
60.328%
🤗50.273%
14 further kinds412.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,829reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 21 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @twinkling4. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC≈4,090 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

استكشف أسرار فـن السـرد والروايـة الذكاء الإصطناعي لن يُعلّمك كيف تفاجئ القارئ، أو تثير فيه الترقّب، الخوف، الفضول، كما إن إثراء الخيال والمشاعر لن يكون إلا بسرد من تأليف مميز. https://writers4center.com/ ❗️أنواع مختلفة من التصنيفات الدقيقة لكل نوع من الأدب أمثلة على كل تصنيف إختيار العنوان والنهايات المفاجئة الإنتقال الزمني بين الأحداث والمزيد نظرتك للروايات ككاتب أو قارئ لن تكون نفسها قبل الكورس الرقمي.

17👍3😱2🤷‍♂1

9 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC≈3,910 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

قريبا نتأخر لكننا الأفضل دائمًا.. قد لا أكمل الكتاب كاملا بهذه الرسومات، لأنني وكالعادة، أفضل عدم وجود الرسومات بشكل متكرر لانها تشوه الكتاب.. ما رأيكم، هل نضع كافة الرسومات أم نتجاهلها؟

386🍓3👍2

9 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC≈4,100 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

25🤔11🤷8👀5💔3😐3😢3❤‍🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈5,440 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

أعطوني مصادر عن التهجين في الادب الحديث للشعراء العرب كتب او رسائل او اطاريح

🤷1814🤷‍♀8

7 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈6,880 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

استكشف أسرار فـن السـرد والروايـة الذكاء الإصطناعي لن يُعلّمك كيف تفاجئ القارئ، أو تثير فيه الترقّب، الخوف، الفضول، كما إن إثراء الخيال والمشاعر لن يكون إلا بسرد من تأليف مميز. https://writers4center.com/ ❗️أنواع مختلفة من التصنيفات الدقيقة لكل نوع من الأدب أمثلة على كل تصنيف إختيار العنوان والنهايات المفاجئة الإنتقال الزمني بين الأحداث والمزيد نظرتك للروايات ككاتب أو قارئ لن تكون نفسها قبل الكورس الرقمي.

35🤔5👾4🗿3😡3🤓1

1 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC≈12,000 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

استكشف أسرار فـن السـرد والروايـة الذكاء الإصطناعي لن يُعلّمك كيف تفاجئ القارئ، أو تثير فيه الترقّب، الخوف، الفضول، كما إن إثراء الخيال والمشاعر لن يكون إلا بسرد من تأليف مميز. https://writers4center.com/ ❗️أنواع مختلفة من التصنيفات الدقيقة لكل نوع من الأدب أمثلة على كل تصنيف إختيار العنوان والنهايات المفاجئة الإنتقال الزمني بين الأحداث والمزيد نظرتك للروايات ككاتب أو قارئ لن تكون نفسها قبل الكورس الرقمي.

52🤬7😍3👍1😢1

30 Jul 2026, 20:22 UTC≈12,700 views82 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

66❤‍🔥8💋4😁2💊1😭1

30 Jul 2026, 20:22 UTC≈11,600 views96 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

رواية: «جريمة حفلة عيد الأشباح». الكاتب: «أجاثا ماري كلاريسا مالوان/أجاثا كريستي». عدد الصفحات: «174». لغة الترجمة: «العربية». تاريخ النشر: «1969م». التصنيف: «تحقيق، بوليسية، جرائم». فئة الرواية: «🔴». مصدر النسخة الأصلية: «نادي كولنز للجرائم/بريطانيا». مصدر النسخة المترجمة: «دار عالم الثقافة للنشر والتوزيع/الأردن». المترجم: «لا معلومات». نوع النسخة: «#مدفوعة». جميع الحقوق محفوظة لدا: «مكتبة ضَــاد الإلكترونية»©. نبذة

77❤‍🔥10😡3👾2👍1🗿1😁1😭1

28 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC≈11,600 views69 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

58🍓4😁4👾3

28 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC≈11,900 views76 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

رواية: «نار بلا شرار». الكاتب: «خولة حمدي». عدد الصفحات: «423». اللغة الأصليّة: «العربية». تاريخ النشر: «2026م». التصنيف: «فانتازيا، خيال، تشويق، مغامرات». اسم السلسلة: «حجر الشمس». الجزء: «3». مكتملة. فئة الرواية: «🔴». مصدر النسخة الأصلية: «دار كيان للنشر والتوزيع/مصر» نوع النسخة: «#مدفوعة». جميع الحقوق محفوظة لدا: «مكتبة ضَــاد الإلكترونية»©. نبذة عن القصّة:«قد يكون في نظرهم رومانسياً ميؤوساً منه، لكنه يرفض أن يستس

58👍6❤‍🔥4🍓4😈3👾1

22 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC≈16,900 views147 reactionsread 12 August 2026

تجاهلت الفهرس، وكذلك في رسم مثل الاعصار رأيت أنه يشوه بالنص، لكن لم أقم بإزالته إلا في الفصول الأخيرة. لأنه بالنسخة الأصلية الرمز يبدأ صغيرا ثم يتضخم مع مرور الفصول حتى يبدو كالدوامة ويبتلع النص، لا أعلم الهدف منه، لكن وضعت بعضا منه وأزلت الآخر، لكي يكون واضحا أنه ليس من الصعب وضعه، ولكن كان من الجميل إزالته.

118😁9👍8🗿6👏4🍓1🤷‍♀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @twinkling4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 320,901 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مكتبة ليلى للكُتب الإكترونية📚
@justabookk · 220,856
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 August 2026
حُبًّا للقراءة
@freebooksf · 204,855
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
كتب وروايات pdf
@novels2n · 172,786
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
عالم الكتب PDF
@Lovers_of_books · 181,065
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مكتبة ضاد” (@twinkling4), 53,963 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twinkling4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.