📢 节点修复完成通知 部分异常节点现已完成修复,节点配置已更新。 请各位用户及时前往客户端更新订阅,获取最新节点信息。 操作步骤: 1. 打开客户端; 2. 更新订阅链接; 3. 等待节点列表刷新完成; 4. 重新连接即可。 如更新后仍无法正常使用,请尝试重启客户端或重新导入订阅。 感谢大家的理解与支持,我们会持续优化节点质量,提升服务稳定性。

Channel
滕王阁
@twg520com
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,041subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003764248366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @twg520com |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 27 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/twg520com |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 1,041 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 1,045 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 1,045 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 60.8%
- avg views ÷ 1,041 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 633
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.34%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,530 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 38 | 54.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 12.9% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 8.57% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 7.14% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 5.71% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
📢 节点协议升级通知 为了进一步提升网络稳定性、连接速度以及抗干扰能力,我们将对部分节点进行协议升级。 本次调整内容: 🔄 原 QUIC 协议节点 → VLESS 协议节点 升级后: - ✅ 连接稳定性进一步提升 - ✅ 延迟表现优化 - ✅ 兼容性更好,支持更多客户端 - ✅ 高峰期连接体验有所改善 请各位用户注意: 1. 本次升级无需重新购买套餐,原有流量和到期时间不受影响; 2. 请在客户端内重新更新订阅,获取最新节点配置; 3. 如果更新订阅后仍显示旧节点,请尝试删除旧订阅后重新添加; 4. 部分客户端可能需要重启后才能正常连接。 推荐使用最新版客户端: - Windows:v2rayN / Flclash - Android:sing-box / Flclash - iOS:Shadowrocket / Stash 感谢大家一直以来的支持,我们会持续优化线路质量,为大家提供更稳定、更快速的网络体验。…
👍2🔥1
节点已更新,请大家更新订阅
👍1
请大家更新一下订阅
👍3🤮3🏆1
端午85折优惠码:yO1JqNU8
🤮3🔥2
全部维护完毕,请大家更新订阅
🤮2
日本和美国节点进行维护
🤮3
日本美国节点进行维护,维护完毕,请更新订阅
🤡2🤮2
更新完毕,请大家更新订阅
🤮5❤2👏1💩1
hk,sg,jp,kr,tw-1、2、3节点我维护一下,你们先用编号为4的节点
🤮3
20%循环返利招AFF,佣金到300即可提现
🤮6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @twg520com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 732,467 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“滕王阁” (@twg520com), 1,041 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twg520com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.