Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

29PER

@twentynineper

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,186subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716209221
TypeChannel
Username@twentynineper
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/twentynineper

Growth

5,1865,1945,1907 August 2026 — 5,192 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,194 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,192 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,186 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,185–5,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:435,186-6
11 Aug 2026, 02:465,192-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:505,194+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:465,192first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.2%
avg views ÷ 5,186 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,290
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.086%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held31 (4 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total71,044
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3477.3%
👍715.9%
🙏36.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC≈1,820 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

8월 12일 미증시 핵심 요약, 폭풍전야 바로가기 👉 https://youtu.be/aoL2LiKkFUY

1

11 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC≈1,490 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

좋은 아침입니다☀️ Morning Report(2026.08.12.수) ☀️29PER 모닝 브리핑 미국 증시가 11일(현지시간) 3대 지수 나란히 밀리며 마감했습니다. 하루 뒤로 다가온 7월 소비자물가지수를 앞두고 방향을 걸지 않으려는 심리가 지배해 거래량이 20일 평균을 밑돌았고, 대부분 종목이 좁은 폭에서 오르내렸습니다. 여기에 엔비디아가 내놓은 대규모 인공지능 인프라 금융 구상과 오픈 모델 공개를 두고 해석이 갈리면서 클라우드 대형주에 매물이 몰린 점이 지수를 눌렀습니다. 반면 중소형주와 반도체는 소폭이나마 올라 대형 기술주와 온도차를 보였습니다. 🚀29PER 예상 주요 섹터 "호남팹 2029년 1차 완공… 용인팹 전력공급 2041년 완료"⚡️ 정부가 2029년 호남 반도체 산업단지 1차 완공을 목표로 예정부지인 광주 군공항

3

11 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,040 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

2026.08.11.화 테마맵입니다🔥 편하게 공유해 주세요! 📣29PER (https://t.me/twentynineper) '테마맵'은 '상승률'과 함께 '높은 거래량'을 우선시하여 제작하였기에 비교적 정확하게 당일 시장의 주도 섹터 및 종목을 확인할 수 있습니다

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈1,910 viewsread 12 August 2026

29PER Market Pulse | 8월 11일 (화) 🔔 🎯 오늘의 핵심 (Key Concept) 어제까지 연출되었던 극단적인 코스닥 쏠림 현상이 하루 만에 역전되며, 코스피가 외국인과 기관의 쌍끌이 매수세에 힘입어 +1.25% 반등한 6,378선을 기록 중입니다. 반면 코스닥은 -0.46% 하락하며 숨고르기에 들어갔습니다. 비차익 프로그램 매수가 5,300억 원 이상 유입되며 대형주 중심의 패시브 수급이 다시 가동되고 있습니다. 오늘 밤 예정된 슈퍼마이크로컴퓨터(SMCI)의 4분기 실적 발표와 내일(12일) 발표될 미국 7월 CPI(소비자물가지수)라는 핵심 펀더멘털 및 매크로 분수령을 앞두고, 시장 자금이 단기 과열된 중소형주에서 대형주로 리밸런싱(Rebalancing)되는 흐름이 뚜렷하게 포착됩니다. ⚡️ 시장 핵심 체크포인트 코

10 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC531 viewsread 12 August 2026

8월 11일 미증시 핵심 요약, 제..발.. 바로가기 👉 https://youtu.be/JEuCMyrZ7GE

10 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC≈2,030 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

좋은 아침입니다☀️ Morning Report(2026.08.11.화) ☀️29PER 모닝 브리핑 미국 증시가 10일(현지시간) 일제히 하락 마감했습니다. 호르무즈 해협 재개방 협상에 회의론이 번지며 국제 유가가 5% 넘게 치솟았고, 이번 주 소비자물가지수(CPI)·생산자물가지수(PPI) 발표를 앞두고 인플레이션 우려가 되살아났습니다. 자금은 에너지와 사이버보안·제약으로 몰린 반면, 인텔의 대규모 유상증자 발표가 촉매가 되어 반도체 전반이 큰 폭으로 밀리며 지수를 끌어내렸습니다. 지수 낙폭 자체는 얕았지만 필라델피아 반도체 지수만 3% 가까이 빠지며 업종 간 온도차가 뚜렷했습니다. 🚀29PER 예상 주요 섹터 유가, 호르무즈 불확실성에 급등…美비축유는 43년來 최저⚡️ 국제유가가 호르무즈 해협 재개통 불확실성 속에 급등하는 가운데

2👍1

10 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC≈2,190 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

2026.08.10.월 테마맵입니다🔥 편하게 공유해 주세요! 📣29PER (https://t.me/twentynineper) '테마맵'은 '상승률'과 함께 '높은 거래량'을 우선시하여 제작하였기에 비교적 정확하게 당일 시장의 주도 섹터 및 종목을 확인할 수 있습니다

1

10 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈2,020 viewsread 12 August 2026

🟢 29PER Market Pulse | 8월 10일 (월) 🧭 오늘의 핵심 (Key Concept) 지난주 금요일 뉴욕 증시가 고용 지표를 소화하며 급반등(나스닥 +1.30%, 필라델피아 반도체 +2.56%)에 성공한 훈풍이 전해졌으나, 오늘 국장은 양 시장 간 극단적인 디커플링(Decoupling) 현상이 연출되고 있습니다. 코스피는 외국인의 1.3조 원대 순매도와 비차익 프로그램 매물(-1.46조 원)에 밀려 -0.29% 내린 6,240선에서 숨고르기를 진행 중인 반면, 코스닥은 외국인과 기관의 강력한 양매수가 유입되며 +5.48% 폭등한 842선을 단숨에 뚫어냈습니다. 이번 주 예정된 미국 7월 CPI(소비자물가지수) 발표와 슈퍼마이크로컴퓨터(SMCI), 코어위브(CoreWeave) 등 AI 인프라 핵심 기업들의 실적 공개를 앞두

9 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC≈2,320 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

좋은 아침입니다☀️ Morning Report(2026.08.10.월) ☀️29PER 모닝 브리핑 7월 고용이 2.3만 건 감소하며 시장 예상(+8.3만 건)을 완전히 뒤집자, 시장은 이를 "연준이 당분간 금리를 올릴 이유가 없어졌다"는 신호로 읽고 상승 출발했습니다. 다만 고용 쇼크는 경기 둔화 신호이기도 해 상승폭은 제한됐고, 장중에는 종목별로 돈이 갈리는 흐름이 이어졌습니다. 메모리·카드·소비재가 빠지며 다우는 제자리걸음을 한 반면, 소프트웨어와 인공지능 칩이 강해 나스닥만 뚜렷하게 앞서갔습니다. 장 마감 무렵 호르무즈 해협 통항 재개 기대가 더해지며 지수는 한 번 더 올라 S&P500이 사상 최고치로 마감했습니다. 🚀29PER 예상 주요 섹터  고점서 반토막 난 코닝 … 트럼프 규제에 힘받나 소재·광학 기업 코닝의 주가가 인

5

8 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC≈2,740 viewsread 12 August 2026

8월 8일 미증시 핵심 요약, 고용 쇼크가 호재가 된 날 바로가기 👉 https://youtu.be/MrFmKHDqRKY

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @twentynineper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 790,583 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“29PER” (@twentynineper), 5,186 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twentynineper.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.