Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⊹ ☾︎ › ֶָ 𝒯weets ᥫ᭡ ₊

Channel

⊹ ☾︎ › ֶָ 𝒯weets ᥫ᭡ ₊

@tweeeters

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,921subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001458332741
TypeChannel
Username@tweeeters
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tweeeters

Growth

3,9213,9523,936.56 August 2026 — 3,952 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,949 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,942 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,933 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,921 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,916–3,957 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:353,921-12
13 Aug 2026, 15:573,933-9
10 Aug 2026, 07:343,942-7
7 Aug 2026, 17:573,949-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:333,952first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

199 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19397.0%
👎63.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 29 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Mar 2026, 15:06 UTC994 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Yang paling sakit bukan bila kau pergi, tapi bila kau bahagia tanpa aku. — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍5

Signed Jason Paul

29 Mar 2026, 14:38 UTC973 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

sakit putus cinta ? sakit lgi bila lauk sume dh masak tp lupa nk masak nasi😭 — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍9

Signed Jason Paul

29 Mar 2026, 14:35 UTC968 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hidup terlalu singkat untuk membuang masa dengan orang yang tak pandai menghargai — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍9

Signed Jason Paul

29 Mar 2026, 14:31 UTC946 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Your savings are limited but your income is unlimited. — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍9

Signed Jason Paul

29 Mar 2026, 14:30 UTC865 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Financial freedom is buying what you want without asking the price. — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍9

Signed Jason Paul

8 Mar 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 8 August 2026

Harap waris-waris aku tak kecewa tengok harta pusaka dalam bank aku nanti . Dalam Zus app ada lagi RM40 . Bahagi bahagilah 😔🙏 — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

Signed mira

7 Mar 2026, 05:35 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 8 August 2026

Gen Z mesti tak tahu yang setan tu sebenarnya ada dua. Satu gemok satu kurus. Yang gemok tu warna hijau. Yang kurus tu warna purple. — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

Signed mira

6 Mar 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,220 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

nasib hidup gen z : baru lahir : tsunami aceh kanak-kanak : kiamat 2012 remaja : covid-19 dewasa : perang amerika vs iran — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍11

Signed mira

4 Mar 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,150 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

jangan berpura-pura sayang kalau hati dah berubah . 😒 — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍2

Signed mira

1 Mar 2026, 13:13 UTC≈1,250 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

dear wallet , please pregnant some money 😢 — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍17

Signed mira

26 Feb 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,330 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

menangis sampai demam is another level of heartpainsomuch 😭 — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍25

Signed mira

23 Feb 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,440 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

kerja keraslah sehingga benda yang mahal nampak murah . 😎 — 🥡 ⨾ @tweeeters ꒱

👍15

Signed mira

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tweeeters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 307,228 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝘕𝘖𝘛𝘈 & 𝘔𝘖𝘋𝘜𝘓 𝘚𝘗𝘔 𝘒𝘚𝘚𝘔 08 // 09 ♡︎ 🇲🇾🇵🇸
@spmstudytips · 107,638
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⊹ ☾︎ › ֶָ 𝒯weets ᥫ᭡ ₊” (@tweeeters), 3,921 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tweeeters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.