Channel
@twdrmh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
832subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003394114124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @twdrmh |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/twdrmh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 832 | +19 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 813 | +17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 796 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 794 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 794 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 386 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
50 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 14.0% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 6.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
帥哥約妹方便的時段是？
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👠 我是朵拉 @dr8389 很多人喜歡聽漂亮話， 但我偏偏比較不會那一套。 該提醒的，我會提醒； 該說明的，我會說清楚。 有時候講話太直接， 可能會讓人覺得： 「欸？這人怎麼那麼白目😂」 好啦，我承認， 我的情商偶爾可能需要維修一下🤣 但是我的個性就是這樣—— 不喜歡畫大餅， 也不喜歡講一些自己做不到的承諾。 我寧願當那個偶爾讓你皺眉的人， 也不想當那個只會讓你開心聽完， 最後卻失望的人。 😼 「我說實話你又不高興」 沒辦法， 這就是朵拉的日常。 嘴巴可能不甜， 但做人有底線； 個性可能直接， 但態度一直認真。 謝謝願意了解我的人 ❤️ — 👠 朵拉
突然想寫幾句心裡話。 剛剛有位客人來問我： 「有沒有雙北年輕的？」 他說之前在別家，都沒有遇到想找的類型。 其實看到這句話的時候，我是認真放在心上的。 我花時間幫他整理、篩選，也希望不要隨便敷衍任何一個來找朵拉的人。 因為我一直覺得， 既然人家願意相信我，我就應該認真對待。 只是沒想到…… 等了一段時間，訊息沒有等到。 後來看著已讀， 再後來看到……TG 被封鎖。 那一瞬間，其實心裡有一點酸。 不是因為少了一個客人， 而是覺得自己的認真，好像被輕輕帶過了。 網路上的世界就是這樣， 有些人來來去去， 有些人甚至連一句「不用了，謝謝」都沒有。 有時候熱情換來的是沉默， 認真換來的是封鎖。 但朵拉還是想說， 如果不信任我，其實不用勉強密我。 我不是一個只看數字的人， 我更在意的是相處的感覺。 可以不約， 可以慢慢了解， 但希望彼此之間至少有基本的尊重跟溝通。 其實這個要求，一點都不難吧？ 一路走到現在， …
極品推薦｜若語 🔥 📌 若語 158 / D / 21歲 今天這位真的讓人印象深刻❤️🔥 一進門就展現滿滿親和力，互動感非常好，完全沒有距離感，整個過程都能感受到她的熱情與用心賴82833 。 不只是外型亮眼，重點是服務態度、配合度以及氣氛營造都很加分✨ 小隻馬身材，靈活又有魅力，讓人感覺像是遇到難得的精品等級。 很多妹妹可能只有外表，但露絲是屬於「相處起來會讓人記住」的類型❤️ ⭐️ 熱情度：★★★★★ ⭐️ 互動感：★★★★★ ⭐️ 配合度：★★★★★ 這種等級真的不是每天都有，喜歡甜美外型＋高互動感的大大，可以把握這次機會🔥 — 朵拉精選推薦 ✨ 品質只挑好的，不浪費大家時間。
🤩🤩
❤5
@dr8382 限時送三個客人優惠
LINE: 直接搜帳號@639skydq 只要有心 人人都可以成為朵拉的客人 看什麼看 說的就是你 快密我啦~~XD
❤4
一號要的不是業績 是信心 是開門紅 望周知 @dr8382 給我一點信心吧
❤8
⚠️ 澳客的不明行為‼️ 💢 介紹完已讀不回 💢 不讀不回 💢 問完後直接消失 💢 三天兩頭來問妹妹，介紹完就已讀不回、不讀不回，這樣持續三個月，還是一樣😂 💢 話題直接從妹妹轉移到 GTO 身上，一直跟朵拉聊色色😏 ❤️ PS：朵拉可以聊色色，但我們也要分一下重點啦～ 如果你目前不想約妹，只是想先了解妹妹的資訊，完全沒問題👌 但不要聊著聊著，妹妹的事情完全不聊了，話題全部跑到朵拉身上；或是介紹完妹妹後就已讀不回、不讀不回，朵拉也是會小小受傷的啦🥹 ❌ 拒絕澳客行為，從你我做起！ 其實，如果你現在沒有打算約妹，只是想找人聊天、聊色色，也可以大大方方跟朵拉說： 「我現在不想約，只想聊天。」 朵拉如果剛好有空，也很樂意陪你聊聊天、打發時間😁 如果你想交流一些觀念、姿勢或經驗，朵拉雖然沒辦法手把手教你，但可以透過聊天分享一些心得，或是在不忙的時候陪你討論，讓你之後跟妹妹相處起來更舒服、更有默契😉 ✅ PS：朵拉除了最愛工作之外，第二喜…
💯3❤1
💗💗
那些長期潛伏在我Telegram裡面不露面的狼友 又不來表達對我的愛意 也不來表達對正妹的愛意 你說你是何居心 就算想暗算我 那也出個聲啊xd~ @dr8382
❤4
🌧 外面下雨了 有人在躲雨， 有人在上班， 有人在滑手機， 而你是不是剛好在想： 今天要不要找朵拉喝杯茶呢？😆
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @twdrmh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
帥哥約妹方便的時段是？
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 23,812 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“特價特惠特別推薦區😝賴82833” (@twdrmh), 832 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twdrmh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.