5 measurements spanning 10 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,886–1,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:36
1,888
+2
14 Aug 2026, 00:25
1,886
-3
10 Aug 2026, 19:15
1,889
+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:47
1,888
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:01
1,888
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.9%
avg views ÷ 1,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
526
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
17 (30 May 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
5,787
Reactions total
435
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
887 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
301
33.9%
❤🔥
278
31.3%
🕊
92
10.4%
custom 5470181385975124096
65
7.33%
🔥
59
6.65%
🍓
29
3.27%
custom 5976656814421316750
20
2.25%
👍
14
1.58%
🤝
10
1.13%
💯
8
0.902%
🥰
6
0.676%
🤔
3
0.338%
✍
1
0.113%
💘
1
0.113%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 887reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
5.88%
1 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
474
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
619
over 16 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
💌 СЕМЬ УНИВЕРСАЛЬНЫХ СЮЖЕТОВ
Всем привет, друзья! Сегодня мы рассмотрим семь универсальных сюжетов, сформированных литературоведом Кристофером Букером. По его мнению, практически любое произведение литературы и кинематографа опирается на один из этих каркасов. Давайте поговорим о каждом из них, а вы подумаете, есть ли хоть одно совпадение с вашей историей.
🤍Победить чудовище
Главный герой или группа героев узнает …
🤔ОБЛОЖКИ И ВИЗУАЛИЗАЦИЯ
Всем привет, друзья! Продолжаю делиться полезными ссылками, сегодня у нас на очереди сайты, где можно сделать обложки для книг и просто визуализировать героев, местность или создать карту.
БЛОК 2: СОЗДАНИЕ ИЗОБРАЖЕНИЙ
🌟 Midjourney AI
Качественная визуализация, она намного выше по качеству чем многие бесплатные аналоги, однако единственный минус, что вам бесплатно даётся лишь 2 изображения …
💬ПОЛЕЗНЫЕ ССЫЛКИ
Всем привет, друзья! Сегодня у нас будет сборная солянка: я поделюсь ссылками, где можно опубликовать свои работы, где сделать визуализацию вашей истории и куда можно двигаться дальше, чтобы развиваться в области писательства. Чтобы всё было понятно, я разделю пост на блоки.
🤚1 БЛОК: ЛИТЕРАТУРНЫЕ КОНКУРСЫ
Зачем писателю участвовать в литературных конкурсах? Это хороший способ заявить о себе, налич…
Вторая часть «Мифы о писательской деятельности»
😥Хороший писатель пишет без ошибок
Знаю, что многие переживают! Грамотность – это хорошо, но даже знаменитые и опытные авторы имеют своих редакторов. Раньше их даже было несколько. Это сейчас требования стали чуть ниже, но и цена на такие книги, сами понимаете, будет гораздо меньше.
Черновик редко бывает идеальным. Некоторые романы переписываются десятки раз. Так что…
Мифы о писательской деятельности
Какой он – мир литературы? Ведь вокруг столько мнений, у каждого свой опыт: печальный, вдохновляющий и даже пугающий. Так что же из этого истина? Всё, друзья. Каждый путь абсолютно индивидуальный, кому-то всё будто бы само в руки идёт, а другой вынужден биться в закрытые двери, чтобы быть услышанным.
Давайте разберём самые популярные мифы, уверена, вы уже слышали о них, а кто-то даж…
15 минут в неделю. Всего семь недель. Бесплатно.
Курс «Сила истории» от «Альпины» — это семь писем, которые научат вас рассказывать истории так, чтобы вас слушали до конца.
🔘В каждом письме — один приём и одна книга из библиотеки Alpina Digital.
🔘 Читается за 15 минут, применяется в тот же день.
🔘 Никаких сложных анкет.
Просто оставляете почту — и получаете письмо раз в неделю.
🟪Узнайте, как придумать идею, напи…
После завтра вас ждёт пост про мифы в писательской деятельности. И скажите, нужны ли полезные ссылки: где искать литературные конкурсы, зачем они нужны, куда отправлять свои рукописи и так далее? Также вы можете написать свои вопросы здесь, под постом, а я потом отвечу.
Всем хорошего дня 😘
🟥Как писать регулярно?
Всем привет друзья! Многих волнует вопрос, где найти тот самый способ, который поможет довести рукопись до финала? Ответ здесь один: сесть и начать писать. Но давайте я приведу несколько примеров, как можно этот тяжёлый процесс сделать ярче и интереснее.
Быть писателем – это значит работать над своей книгой. А работать всегда нелегко. Придётся приложить усилия, иногда писать через «не хочу». …
Думаете, написать книгу — это долго, сложно и дорого?
Интенсив «Писательский спринт» от «Альпины» докажет обратное.
За 8 дней вы создадите черновик первой главы.
Мы не обещаем вам готовый роман, но мы гарантируем, что вы:
Перестанете бояться чистого листа.
Научитесь писать цепляющие заголовки и вступления.
Освоите сторителлинг для своей экспертной ниши.
Получите личный разбор от наставника, если войдете в пяте…
🔻МЕМЫ🔺
А у вас бывает непреодолимое желание начать писать главу? И что вы делаете, если время и место совсем неподходящие?
Твой Островок DZENA | Писательский край 📕
📱Напоминаю, что наш Островок теперь есть в вк 💖
❤64💯8🕊7❤🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tvoyyDzen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Всем привет! Заметила, что многие покидают канал. Поделитесь, что бы вы хотели видеть здесь? Почему думаете уйти? Хочу вновь активно вести канал, мне нужна ваша помощь!
Хочу видеть больше мемов36%
Хочу больше статей и полезной информации77%
Хочу больше лёгкой информации: про новинки, про авторов, возможно, скандалы в литературном мире29%
Хочу больше интерактивов и заданий30%
Хочу разбор ошибок49%
Свой вариант (не бойтесь писать, этим вы мне очень поможете)4%
The shares total 225%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 975,747 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Твой Островок DZENA | Писательский край” (@tvoyyDzen), 1,888 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tvoyyDzen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
