11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,437–10,474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 09:37
10,441
-15
14 Aug 2026, 02:37
10,456
-5
12 Aug 2026, 21:35
10,461
-5
11 Aug 2026, 22:24
10,466
+9
10 Aug 2026, 19:56
10,457
-1
9 Aug 2026, 19:11
10,458
-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:34
10,464
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:55
10,465
-5
6 Aug 2026, 14:01
10,470
+5
6 Aug 2026, 10:15
10,465
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:59
10,465
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.2%
avg views ÷ 10,441 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,470
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.387%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
19 (18 June 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
17,340
Reactions total
62
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
6m 47s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
305 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
66
21.6%
👍
51
16.7%
😱
48
15.7%
🙏
29
9.51%
😭
24
7.87%
💘
17
5.57%
💯
17
5.57%
🤬
17
5.57%
👏
14
4.59%
😁
9
2.95%
💔
4
1.31%
🏆
2
0.656%
👌
2
0.656%
😢
2
0.656%
🤗
2
0.656%
⚡
1
0.328%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tvkproverka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Быть первыми в эпицентре событий – это наша работа»: как проекты Натальи Кечиной меняли судьбы людей
13 августа стало известно о смерти журналиста ТВК Натальи Кечиной. Она проработала в телекомпании более 30 лет. Судьбы людей, эксперименты на грани и личная драма – вспоминаем, как истории Натальи нередко выходили на федеральный уровень и меняли жизни людей.
ТВК в MAX | Telegram | ВК | Буст
Пляж на о. Татышев в эти выходные. В такую жару там весь Красноярск, судя по видео🫣
➡️Как-то там снимали проверку летнюю. Вот поглядите, как было и напишите – изменилось ли что-то там.
Проверка ТВК | ТВК в MAX
317 человек заболели клещевыми инфекциями с начала сезона в Красноярском крае
За последнюю неделю к медикам после укусов клещей обратились 366 жителей нашего региона, в том числе 20 детей. Об этом сообщили в Роспотребнадзоре.
Всего с начала сезона зафиксировали 15148 пострадавших. Из них 317 заболело клещевыми инфекциями: 174 – вирусным энцефалитом, 130 – боррелизом, 10 – сибирским тифом, 2 – эрлихиозом, 1 – анапла…
Та самая серия «Проверки» ТВК про сквер Полтавский
Напомним, его построили совсем недавно, в 2022 году. Только выглядит он уже заброшенным, пишут наши зрители.
Смотрите выпуск, где удобно👇
🟢YouTube
🟢ВКонтакте
🟢Дзен
Проверка ТВК | ТВК в MAX
Ярко-красные лавочки появились в сквере Полтавский
Нестандартный цвет обсуждают местные жители. По мнению многих, оттенок не вписывается в концепцию эко-сквера.
Самое заметное — лавочки и урны после ремонта покрасили в ярко-красный цвет. Смотрится это совсем не в духе того, что мы создавали вместе с жителями. Разберёмся, почему так вышло, и обязательно исправим — управление зелёного строительства получило задачу вы…
Напавшие на съемочную группу «Проверки ТВК» сотрудники детсада полностью возместили причиненный ущерб
Речь идет о частном детском саду на проспекте Свободный, где 21 апреля ведущая Екатерина Кашутчик и оператор Иван Глушанков снимали очередной выпуск программы. Собственники здания – 57-летний мужчина и 62-летняя женщина – потребовали прекратить съемку.
После они применили в отношении журналистов «насилие, не опасно…
Могут ли отказать в зачислении ребенка в 10 класс: ответ Минпросвещения
В правительстве разъяснили правила приема в старшую школу. Как передают «РИА Новости», в учреждении могут отказать в приеме в 10-й класс, но только по определенному ряду причин.
Тем не менее, на местных властях лежит ответственность за то, чтобы предоставить альтернативную школу для ребенка. Публикуем объяснения от министерства просвещения – у …
«Проверка ТВК» побывала в мае на «Зелёном берегу», и мы показали, что там действительно местами проседает земля, провалы в том числе были и на детских площадках
Некоторые ограждения тогда повалило ветром. Зрители писали, что берег будто брошен и нуждается в уходе.
Сейчас видим, что появились новые ограждения, к каким-то объектам и вовсе ограничили вход. Что ж, очень ждем, когда всё наладят. Задумка такого сквера са…
«Берег обваливается»: часть набережной в Зеленой Роще временно закроют из-за угрозы оползня
Фрагмент одной из самых популярных набережных Красноярска скоро станет недоступной для горожан. На «Зеленом берегу» в Зеленой Роще устанавливают металлическое ограждение. Власти объясняют это угрозой новых оползней. Жители опасаются, что любимое место отдыха закроют на неопределенный срок и требуют ответов.
Почему берег приз…
Самая популярная серия «Проверки ТВК» за всё время существования проекта: из минимаркета в Академгородке
Более 2 100 000 просмотров и почти 3 000 комментариев на YouTube!
Съёмки этой серии тогда закончились заявлением в полицию. А у Екатерины Кашутчик не осталось ни одной чистой белой перчатки.
Посмотрите, если еще не видели
Проверка ТВК | ТВК в MAX
В Красноярске умерла женщина, в квартире которой жили 100 кошек. Волонтеры просят помощи
Волонтерам приюта для кошек «Дом Оззи» поступила информация о квартире на правобережье, в которой остались 100 кошек. Их хозяйка умерла и животных некому забрать. Без помощи они погибнут. Чтобы спасти их и где-то разместить, волонтеры открыли сбор.
ТВК в MAX | Telegram | ВК | Буст
История от подписчика:
«Мне этот пост дался нелегко.
Мой опыт визита на ФГС. Просто хочу предупредить – будьте бдительны.
Пришла по записи в районную поликлинику по ОМС. Она новая, много этажей, просторная... Запись на 15:30. Думала освобожусь через 10 минут, как обычно. Ведь сама процедура проходит довольно быстро.
А там целый коридор с пациентами. Передо мной минимум шесть человек. Оказывается врач опаздывает у…
😱12🤬5👍2😢2😭2💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tvkproverka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,268,164 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЧП Красноярск @kraschp · 141,932 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Проверка ТВК” (@tvkproverka), 10,441 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tvkproverka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.