Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 晚安的朋友圈

Channel

晚安的朋友圈

@tv869

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

445subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002213206099
TypeChannel
Username@tv869
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tv869

Growth

412445428.525 August 2026 — 412 subscribers26 August 2026 — 415 subscribers2 September 2026 — 445 subscribers25 August 20262 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 407–450 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 04:34445+30
26 Aug 2026, 03:24415+3
25 Aug 2026, 23:31412first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.0%
avg views ÷ 445 subscribers
Avg views / post
334
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held18 (11 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total6,006
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3746.8%
💩1113.9%
👌78.86%
🤣78.86%
👀45.06%
🤡45.06%
🍓33.80%
👍33.80%
🕊33.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

记录一些领悟 同时给哪些心术不正的小人看看 别TM一天搞小动作举报我频道了 不要陷入零和博弈 不要把世界看成非黑即白的敌我关系 不要轻易给自己树立竞争对手 更不要把自己放在受害者的位置 做事不能只凭个人喜好 要尊重市场规律 理解真实需求 创造真实价值 遇到问题不要期待贵人出现 真正能够长期依靠的始终是自己 赚不到的钱 本质上是当下的能力还不足以承接 这个世界从来不缺机会 缺的是与机会相匹配的认知能力资源和执行力 与人合作之前 先想清楚自己能提供什么价值 长期稳定的关系 本质上都建立在彼此需要和价值交换之上 保持真诚 但一定要有边界 有原则 有底线 不要恐惧未知 也不要害怕失控 人生本身就是不断进入未知 再从混乱中建立秩序的过程 创业也是如此 在不确定中寻找确定性 在变化中寻找规律 在一次次试错中修正方向 不要迷信任何人的成功经验 别人的答案只能作为参考 真正适合自己的路 只能靠自己一步一步走出来 道生一

3

25 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC186 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

一只螃蟹想爬出桶,其他螃蟹不会帮它,反而会伸出钳子,把它重新拽下来 放在人际关系里,其实也是一样 很多时候,别人未必讨厌你,但当你的成长开始打破原有的平衡,当曾经和大家差不多的你突然开始往上走,比较、嫉妒和自我防御就可能随之出现。 所以成年人相处,要学会一点——藏拙 好事自己庆祝,成绩不必反复展示 有钱不必处处显摆,有能力也不必时时证明 少评价别人,少暴露底牌,更不要逢人就证明自己比别人聪明 真正成熟的人、不是没有锋芒、而是懂得什么时候把锋芒收起来 适当示弱,是降低攻击性 保持低调,是减少无意义的比较 不炫耀、不争辩、不轻易暴露自己的全部实力 并不是软弱 而是一种对人性的理解 水深不语 人稳不言 有些路安静地走 有些成绩关起门来庆祝 毕竟真正属于你的东西 不需要通过别人的羡慕来证明价值 #晚安说

24 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC200 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

以后不要说我是空军佬了

👀4👌3🤣2

24 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC194 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026

情绪也有交易成本 该止损的时候就止损 别让一个陌生人的一句话拿走你半天的注意力 #晚安说

3

23 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC218 views7 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

看具体情况吧。群里私下交易,本身就存在被骗风险,真被骗了可以曝光出来提醒大家,但群里无法为任何私下交易做担保。 再次提醒所有群友:不要因为对方在群里待得久、聊得熟,或者有共同好友,就轻易相信任何人。涉及钱、U、换汇、代办等交易,一定先核实身份和资金到账情况。 网络上可以聊天交朋友,但涉及钱的时候——不要相信任何人,只相信自己核实过的结果。 🌟🌟🌟🌟 被骗还被羞辱一顿 气不气咯

7

23 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC203 views12 reactionsread 25 August 2026

我一直是一个靠直面痛苦快速成长的人。 谁痛苦,谁改变;谁改变,谁受益。 一旦发现自己身上存在任何阻碍目标的缺点,我不会逃避,而是逼自己去经历、去承受、去克服。那些真正让我吃过亏、付过代价的东西,我会反复复盘,在每一个相似的节点提醒自己,直到新的认知替代旧的习惯,新的自己成为本能。 无论亲密关系还是事业,我走的每一步都有明确的目的:经历、试错、修正,然后继续向前。 失败和痛苦对我而言,从来不是终点,而是重新认识自己的机会。不断提升认知,看清自己手里的筹码,也看清自己的短板。失去什么并不可怕,真正让我在意的,是能不能从一次失去里找到自己的问题,然后完成下一次升级。 面对当前认知范围内无法掌控的人和事,我不会执着于改变别人。我更愿意承认,是现在的自己还不够强、不够成熟,或者手里的筹码还不够多。 但过去的失败,我不会反复回头。 试错就是试错,经历就是经历。 尤其是人与人的关系,本身就是认识自己成本最低、反馈最快的一面镜子。有人

5💩4👍3

20 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC483 views11 reactionsread 25 August 2026

我是晚安,一个混迹东南亚、靠消息吃瓜的TG博主。 「柬埔寨大事件」创始人,江湖大小事,有料你就来。 爆料、故事、奇闻、现场消息——这里都有。 晚安|@jpz52 柬埔寨大事件 · 记录真实的东南亚江湖。

🤡4💩3🤣31

20 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC510 views11 reactionsread 25 August 2026

关于学习 学习最大的误区,是把知识当成了力量。 第一阶段的人,喜欢收藏知识,听课、买书、做笔记。 第二阶段的人,开始实践,把知识变成技能。 第三阶段的人,能够不断输出,让技能变成影响力。 知识不会改变人生。 行动才会。 所以低认知的人,沉迷输入。 高认知的人,持续输出。 因为真正拉开人与人差距的,不是知道多少,而是做到多少。 知识只有经过行动,才会变成你的能力。

👌4💩4🍓3

18 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC341 viewsread 25 August 2026

因为近期行业波动,鉴于大家的要求,增设业务,免费担保。 只收转账的消耗。双方担心的情况下 可以质押到我这里,地址公开,确认服务完毕 再由我下发 @jpz52 增设甲乙双方 撮合服务。

18 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC343 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

#每日网友故事汇 🌟🌟🌟 《我怎么把自己混成了这样》 这三年,我一直在拼命追赶所谓的捷径。沉迷快钱,迷信风口,心气比天高。总觉得自己和别人不一样,总觉得我能跳出平凡,靠胆量、运气和一点贪心,把命运硬生生改写。 我也确实风光过。见过突如其来的红利,尝过不劳而获的轻松,也曾轻易得到别人可能熬很多年才能拥有的东西。 那时候年少轻狂,意气风发。钱来得太快,快到让我产生了一种错觉:我以为那是能力,其实很多时候,只是时代和运气暂时把我托了起来。 少年得志,最怕把运气当本事。后来才明白,所有凭运气借来的风光,命运早就在暗中标好了价格。到了该还的时候,可能真的会连本带利,一次收走。 这两年,我太着急了。急着证明自己,急着成功,急着赚很多很多的钱,急着让所有曾经看不起我的人看到——我可以。 因为从小到大,好像很少有人认真对我说过:“我相信你,你大胆去做。”听得更多的是打压、否定和贬低。等真正走进社会以后,别人又突然告诉我:“你都这么大了

3

17 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC347 views8 reactionsread 25 August 2026

这个世界没有绝对正确的选择。 你需要做的事情是让这个决定无限接近正确,而不是去后悔这个选择。

5🕊3

16 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC372 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟“我中了100万!” 🌟🌟🌟“兄弟,别激动,钱财乃身外之物。” 🌟🌟🌟“还是你看得开。” 🌟🌟🌟“不过你要是真觉得是身外之物,先借我50万,我帮你保管。” 🌟🌟🌟“你俩都格局小了。” 🌟🌟🌟“什么意思?” 🌟🌟🌟“什么意思?” .... 欲知后事如何请看下集...

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tv869. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“晚安的朋友圈” (@tv869), 445 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tv869.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.