Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TuTu生活志

Channel

TuTu生活志

@tutulifere

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

3,331subscribers

+62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001147137125
TypeChannel
Username@tutulifere
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 31 March 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tutulifere

Growth

3,2693,3313,3007 August 2026 — 3,269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,271 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,277 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,288 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,295 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,308 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,322 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,331 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,260–3,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 02:223,331+9
24 Aug 2026, 06:243,322+14
20 Aug 2026, 18:473,308+13
17 Aug 2026, 19:163,295+7
15 Aug 2026, 03:033,288+11
11 Aug 2026, 13:343,277+6
8 Aug 2026, 23:023,271+2
8 Aug 2026, 00:003,269no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:593,269first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 3,331 subscribers
Avg views / post
596
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.839%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,192
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6336.4%
4224.3%
🥰3319.1%
❤‍🔥169.25%
🔥84.62%
👏63.47%
👀52.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC370 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎬 2026台湾自由行,一个大陆游客的台北旅行观察记录,真实体验与观后感的补充

👍5🔥2

Signed TuTu视频同步

31 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC822 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎬 2026台湾游记 EP8|漫步台北进入自由行尾声,发现超赞地点~到底谁说台北旅行三天就够了?!

👍2🥰1

Signed TuTu视频同步

25 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,210 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎬 2026台湾游记 EP7|居然可以自由进出?大陆人视角下的台北市政府竟是这样...没想到离普通人这么近

👍71❤‍🔥1

Signed TuTu视频同步

20 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,420 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎬 2026台湾游记 EP6 |逛台北艋舺龙山寺、剥皮寮老街,结果这是惊喜又惊吓的一天...

👍6🔥2

Signed TuTu视频同步

16 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,570 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎬 2026台湾游记 EP5|感受台北街头烟火气,士林夜市美食打卡~没想到观光夜市也这么好吃好逛!

🥰7🔥2

Signed TuTu视频同步

13 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,580 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎬 2026台湾游记 EP4|70万件文物 vs 我的一天,暴走传说中的台北故宫!狂看上千件典藏,没想到…

👍4🥰32

Signed TuTu视频同步

6 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,850 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh9GwEnTSi8

👀5👍2❤‍🔥1

Signed TuTu视频同步

3 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,920 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeQMnkrNWuA

👍8❤‍🔥6

Signed TuTu视频同步

30 Jun 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,740 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEIs4nAb6HY

8👍5🥰2❤‍🔥1

Signed TuTu视频同步

24 Jun 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,830 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpQwNJfN70A

👏6❤‍🔥1👍1

Signed TuTu视频同步

14 Jun 2026, 15:47 UTC≈2,040 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t40xFOvBIwU

👍8

Signed TuTu视频同步

4 Jun 2026, 13:40 UTC≈2,160 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TltQ_txLtTU

5👍4

Signed TuTu视频同步

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tutulifere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TuTu生活志” (@tutulifere), 3,331 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tutulifere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.