Channel
@tut_i_dali_prym_per
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
3,247subscribers
+59 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001468128236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tut_i_dali_prym_per |
| Created | 21 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tut_i_dali_prym_per |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 3,247 | +10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 3,237 | +26 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 3,211 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 3,210 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:12 | 3,204 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 3,203 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 3,204 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 3,207 | +29 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 3,178 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 3,179 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 3,181 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 3,184 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 3,188 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,053 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 1,055 | 51.4% | |
| ❤ | 753 | 36.7% | |
| 🤯 | 96 | 4.68% | |
| 👍 | 75 | 3.65% | |
| 🤔 | 40 | 1.95% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 0.828% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 0.779% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.049% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,053 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Записи і виписки Колись за прикладом Гаспарова я став робити «записи і виписки»: виписував з прочитаного й побаченого несподіваний хід, дотепну метафору і т. ін. Поступово воно складається в забавний палімпсест думок і спостережень про літературу-і-життя. Сил споживати і виробляти нове армія лишає небагато, тому ділюся старим — переглядаю «записи і виписки». * * * Хороша прикладка трапилася на днях. Було таке поня…
😁55❤13🤔8
1:1 У призабутих Богом провінційних містечках з дорогою редакцією іноді відбувається те, що Шкловський називав остранением, а Йогансен очудненням — світ стає новим і хоче щось сказати. Той випадок, коли гості забили гол, а господарі — на стадіон. І зрівняли рахунок.
❤73😁19😢1
З'ясовано, що надихало кінорежисера Нолана! В «Сільпі» продається, якщо вам уже 18. Судячи з ціни, хороше.
😁75❤5
Ну хіба це не прекрасно?
❤112😁11👍4
У Києві, щоб побачити ГАЗ-21 "Волга", треба йти на виставку ретроавтомобілів. А в перлині Південного Поділля, штетлі-герої Бершаді, вона кавуни на продаж привозить. У провінційних містечках ще лишилося трохи безпосередньої душевності, але вона, на жаль, приречена. Капіталізм уже йде сюди, і Бершадь починає соромитися себе, вдавати те, чим не є.
❤102
Навряд чи я перший до цього додумався )
😁53🤔6👍4❤1
Забавний приклад наївного перекладу приказки Ученье — свет, а неученье — тьма. Ця школа перекладу, до речі, живе і процвітає.
😁83🤯21
Поезія і мистецтво проростають скрізь, навіть в армії
😁86❤23👍6
Натюрморт
❤96👍10🤯5😱1
Ceci n’est pas Забавний приклад культурної екстраполяції трапився на чемпіонаті світу з футболу, який проходить зараз у США і супроводжується видовищними скандалами і спортивними сенсаціями. Збірна Бельгії провезла через митницю трохи культури і зробила реверанс видатному бельгійському художнику-модерністу Рене Магріту. У доробку Магріта є знаменита картина на епістемологічну тематику: Ceci n’est pas une pipe — «Ц…
❤100😁29👍6🤔5😱1
Українська мова без табу У професійній молодості трапилося мені побувати випусковим редактором відомої книжки Лесі Ставицької «Українська мова без табу. Словник нецензурної лексики та її відповідників». Це був дуже цікавий, повчальний і веселий досвід у мистецтві видавати словники — я тільки-но переїхав у Київ, на горизонті майоріли міражі, були живі мої вчителі. Хто б тоді сказав, що через чверть століття ти будеш …
😁108❤27👍2😱1
Про декор у наборі перекладу У практичному перекладі важливо відрізняти форму від змісту і не мавпувати без розбору оформительських ходів оригіналу. Скажімо, курсив може нести як шум, так і сигнал. Важливо відрізняти одне від другого. Курсив може бути як логічним наголосом (зберігаємо), так і просто декоративним прийомом (можна не зберігати). От, наприклад, в оригіналі розділи пронумеровано цифрами-буквицями. Приє…
❤39🤔13👍7👎1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tut_i_dali_prym_per. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Прим. пер.” (@tut_i_dali_prym_per), 3,247 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tut_i_dali_prym_per.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.