Channel
@turbofacilitator
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
386subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001388913115 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @turbofacilitator |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/turbofacilitator |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 386 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 387 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 389 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 389 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 117 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня в СберУниверситете провёл бизнес-симуляцию «Однажды в Системе». Из весёлого — диалог клиента, менеджера и работника: Клиент: Возьмётесь за проект? Работник: У нас нет материалов! Менеджер: Мы берёмся за проект, всё сделаем.
👍9
Есть старая управленческая забава: когда в системе что-то не так, сделать вид, что проблема в людях. И начать их чинить — коучить, гномить, терапевтировать, ротировать и увольнять. Система при этом, конечно, ни в чем не виновата. Просто стоит рядом в белом пальто. 4–5 июня на PeopleSense 2026 в Москве я проведу короткую версию бизнес-симуляции «Однажды в системе» на своём мастер-классе «Почему конфликты возвращаютс…
👍11
КУРС-СИМУЛЯЦИЯ «ОДНАЖДЫ В СИСТЕМЕ» Участники проживают, как работает система изнутри. На прошлой неделе провел для Альфа-банка. Мои заметки: — Как у вас, мидлов, дела? — У нас??? В смысле у группы которой рулю? — «Мы тащим ВСЁ!» Мидлов никогда нет на месте. Даже фото специально сделал — их стол пуст. Они разрываются, либо у топов, либо с работягами. Оказавшись в роли топов из работяг, как вы себя чувствуете? — я …
👍12
Ограничения работы ИИ лучше всего видны когда просишь нарисовать картинку. Хотел сгенерировать оптическую иллюзию, а ChatGPT — пока не могёт.
👍5
Моя интуиция, она у меня как пятое колесо. Начинаю чувствовать, что в системе что-то поехало, но не могу понять что именно. Так было с московским метро — в какой-то момент ловлю себя на ощущении, что стало каким-то не таким. Ну станции? Те же! Поезда? Те же! Люди? Вроде те же… а ощущение не уходит. Хожу с этим несколько недель: «ну что-то же изменилось, блин», а зацепиться не за что. Никто в обморок не падает, ничего…
👍17
Я только что стал сертифицированным SAFe RTE — что, по сути, очень изящный способ сказать, что теперь могу профессионально фасилитировать хаос каждые 10 недель и называть это "каденсом".😉
👍38
Сегодня провел первую в этом году бизнес-симуляцию. Внезапно для подростков. Мои инсайты: Основное отличие — подростки не притворяются. Ситуация первая. ТОПЫ. В бизнес симуляции получили власть. И дальше: так у нас тут задача, надо придумать и нарисовать 10 лозунгов. Сколько вас там? 10 работников? Отлично пусть каждый придумает по одному лозунгу и готово. После этого руководящая грядка устроилась в креслах и нача…
👍25
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @turbofacilitator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 526,627 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дмитрий Лазарев | Организационный консультант” (@turbofacilitator), 386 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/turbofacilitator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.