Channel
@tumar_one
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
261subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001504431933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tumar_one |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tumar_one |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 261 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 259 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 255 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 254 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 254 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
63 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 42.9% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 17.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 15.9% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Important Rules Update We have updated the Tumar.One platform rules - and there are quite a few changes.💥 Before your next submission, please make sure you're up to date. 😃 check here.
🤡11🔥5❤2👍2
May broke the pattern. For two months, the story was the same - .env files, debug modes, open databases. You know, basic negligence. In May, the attack surface shifted: AI infrastructure, secrets buried in React bundles, JWT confusion across microservices, and fresh CVEs being weaponized the same week they drop. Full breakdown - top incident categories, critical cases, and checklists for both hunters and developers…
🔥6❤3👏2👍1
2026 Season 3 is over! Here are the hunters who came out on top: 🥇 mukh4w 🥈 nov3mber 🥉 plrF Thank you all for the relentless hunting and the support. Can't wait to see who will dominate Season 4 😃 🔗 Hunt now
🔥13❤3👍2🐳1
QazNet Monthly Cyber Threat Analytics Digest: April Edition April had it all – .env files in web roots, debug modes left on in prod, open database dumps. Month two, pattern holds – critical incidents rooted not in zero-days, but in configurations that should have been locked down on day one. This month we're also adding two new sections: a breakdown of critical cases and a bug hunter checklist – both in the cards a…
👍5🔥3❤🔥2❤1👏1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @tumar_one. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TumarOne platform (official channel)” (@tumar_one), 261 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tumar_one.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.