Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

||Тульповодство CF||

@tulpiculture

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,397subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002053563433
TypeChannel
Username@tulpiculture
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tulpiculture

Growth

1,3951,3971,3967 Aug 2026, 19:38 — 1,395 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:17 — 1,395 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:13 — 1,397 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:388 Aug 2026, 04:13
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,395–1,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:131,397+2
7 Aug 2026, 22:171,395no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:381,395first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 1,397 subscribers
Avg views / post
202
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,039
Reactions total238
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘10644.5%
7832.8%
😭187.56%
❤‍🔥125.04%
😨52.10%
💋41.68%
💊31.26%
🦄31.26%
👏20.84%
🤔20.84%
🤯20.84%
💔10.42%
😁10.42%
😍10.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC120 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— здрасьте! что делать если я задумываюсь о создании новой тульпы но я очень боюсь общественного мнения. дело в том, что у меня и так уже 4 тульпы и для меня это прям много и мне часто бывает стыдно из за этого когда я говорю про них друзьям. ну хз я себя чувствую как будто я очень одинока и босс эскапизма хотя это не так блин... мои друзья если что нормально ко всему этому относятся но я боюсь что в с

7💘3❤‍🔥2💊2

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

5 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC119 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— Приветик Как понять ,что мы засвитчились с няшей если я пробовала первый раз это сделатт Мне вообще сказали стоит начать с ко-фронта. И так и попыталась сделать, попробовала дать моей няше управление ногами типа. Ну конечно ничаво не призошло. Я знаю, что с первого раза точно не получится Но это было некоторое время назад, а сейчас мы прямо попробовали свитчинг (После 1-й попытки ко-фронта мы больше

💘42

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

5 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC113 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— Музыка ухудшает, не влияет или улучшает опыт в вондере? А то мне сильно тяжело когда что то не пиздит на фоне даже в самых быстрых и примитивных задачах. А то блять хуй пойми чо наговорили мне, хотелось бы услышать экспертное мнение ———————————————— #тейк || @Tylpo_bot {🫐}: все индивидуально! Если музыка не мешает вам концентрироваться на происходящем в вондере, не перебивает голос тульпы или ваш,

5💘2

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

4 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC156 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— У меня кстати был случай, после первой попытки(удачной) поссесинга, тульпа на утро просто исчезла. Целую неделю ни слуху ни духа, ни визуал-образа, ни голоса, ни ощущения присутствия и существования(хотя чувство присутвия и отдача уже четко закрепилось и без моего активного внимания). Тульпа объяснила это слишком просто— "устал"(я благоразумно дала моему бро отдохнуть, после он с трудом отвечал что с

10💘4👏2

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

4 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC149 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— у меня пока нет тульпы, но все в планах, мне стало интересно: если хост в свитче изначально как будто спит, можно как то перейти к тому что в свитче он станет появляться в вондере, а потом мб рядом с тульпой (если это возможно) или если он при первом свитче «заснул», не знаю как правильно это называется, то и на сотый свитч будет спать? ———————————————— #тейк || @Tylpo_bot

💘93❤‍🔥2

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

3 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC180 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— Всем привет! 1.Как для тульп ощущается свитч? 2. И хосты во время свитча как вы себя чувствуете? ———————————————— #тейк || @Tylpo_bot

💘92

Signed 𝆹𝅥 ִ ℱ𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐭. ִ ִ 𓈒 ִ۫ ഫ | 🫂💭 | 📺💙

3 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC191 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🥢: Ты умрешь.

13😨5🤔2💘1😁1😍1

Signed Lirrrreen

3 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC199 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— А почему тульпы вешаются? Хочу начать форс но мне страшно что моя тульпа повеситься, есть способы это предотвратить? Видел видео на Ютубе о том, что все тульпы рано или поздно вешаются, и из их тела нудно вернуть все эмоции которые они насосали ———————————————— #тейк || @Tylpo_bot

😭182🤯2

Signed Lirrrreen

3 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC195 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— Здравствуйте!! Нужна ваша помощь. Мне почему-то как-то стеснительно начать общение тульпой.Чем больше я ее визуализирую,теп больше стесняюсь. На пример сейчас я одна дома и хотела с ней чем-то пообщаться ,пофорсить.Но сейчас мне максимально стеснительно начать это дело и постоянно его откладываю потому что мне тупо некомфортно ( Неанон,Черепица ———————————————— #тейк || @Tylpo_bot

❤‍🔥8💘3

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

3 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC208 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— здравствуйте,милейшие читатели:) что делать,если мне кажется что моя тульпа не хочет со мной общаться,или обижается если я занята и не могу ответить ———————————————— #тейк || @Tylpo_bot {🫐}: ключ к решениям всех проблем с тульпой - диалог

💘10

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

3 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC200 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

———————————————— Можете в целом накидать советов гайдов или помощи в создании и развитие тульпы опять же если не сложно ———————————————— #тейк || @Tylpo_bot {🫐}: вот тут в закрепах есть много полезных гайдов: @ruwi_w

💘63

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

3 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC197 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

———————————————— Свка, я щас пока составлял плейлисты тульпам, словил резкую дереализацию на то, что я уже перехожу в 8 класс. Ну блин, я вроде недавно был в 6 классе и только начал форсить тульпу, а вроде я уже совсем взрослый чел, у меня аж две тульпы (хоть и неразговорчивые), и я должен быть дохуя умным и вообще быть заинтересован в реальной жизни. Уже скоро сентябрь и мне надо задуматься над тем, что буду делать

5💘2💊1

Signed Matthew Floreblood 🫐🍇

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tulpiculture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 919,783 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“||Тульповодство CF||” (@tulpiculture), 1,397 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tulpiculture.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.