Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Туданыч news (ТНьюз)

Channel

Туданыч news (ТНьюз)

@tudan_news

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,943subscribers

-225 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276222986
TypeChannel
Username@tudan_news
DescriptionРКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/672dffc9ee419e45414c80b9 Бот @EmpiresPuzzlesBot Чат (общение) @Tudan_Chat Чат (вопросы по делу) @Tudan_qa
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tudan_news

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

24,300 average views per post against 26,943 subscribers — an engagement rate of 90.4%. Across the 17,631 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.77% and 18.1%, with a median of 9.23%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 August 2026 23 September 2026)
Posts measured22 of 22 published in the window (0 exact, 22 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled535,600
Mature posts only90.4% over 22 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers26,943 measured 16 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 17,631 channels · p10 2.45% · p25 4.77% · p50 9.23% · p75 18.1% · p90 30.9%
Position in cohort99.665th percentile · 9.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.11% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

26,94327,16827,055.56 August 2026 — 27,168 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,166 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,161 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,156 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,157 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,156 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,158 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,147 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,145 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,132 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,123 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,132 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,096 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,080 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,071 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,069 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,058 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,070 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,055 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,050 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,060 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,065 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,040 subscribers3 September 2026 — 27,048 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,028 subscribers7 September 2026 — 27,019 subscribers10 September 2026 — 26,982 subscribers12 September 2026 — 26,976 subscribers14 September 2026 — 26,962 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,943 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net -225. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,909–27,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 06:5626,943-19
14 Sept 2026, 09:4126,962-14
12 Sept 2026, 18:0126,976-6
10 Sept 2026, 19:5526,982-37
7 Sept 2026, 16:0127,019-9
4 Sept 2026, 15:0127,028-20
3 Sept 2026, 01:2827,048+8
1 Sept 2026, 05:3627,040-25
31 Aug 2026, 06:0427,065+5
30 Aug 2026, 07:2427,060+10
29 Aug 2026, 05:1127,050-5
28 Aug 2026, 06:5927,055-15
27 Aug 2026, 03:3327,070+12
26 Aug 2026, 03:4227,058-11
25 Aug 2026, 04:4727,069-2
24 Aug 2026, 04:4227,071-9
22 Aug 2026, 11:4827,080-16
21 Aug 2026, 05:0327,096-36
20 Aug 2026, 01:2827,132+9
18 Aug 2026, 21:5527,123first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
90.4%
avg views ÷ 26,943 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,300
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.904%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held44 (28 May 202619 September 2026)
Views total535,600
Reactions total4,841
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 02:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,380
Videos
225
Links
993

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

10,245 reactions across 44 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,99029.2%
👍2,74926.8%
🤣1,51814.8%
💩8228.02%
6906.73%
💯5074.95%
🔥4414.30%
🤬2722.65%
🤔930.908%
👎380.371%
😱230.224%
🤯180.176%
😢160.156%
👏150.146%
💔140.137%
🦄140.137%
😈130.127%
🍾60.059%
40.039%
🎉20.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,245 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 44 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tudan_news. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 15:59 UTC≈12,000 views369 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

➡️ Имя перса хорошее, запоминающееся. В сочетании с ультой, которая вынесет к херам пол-команды. В сочетании с Гриффексом (к), который услужливо подбросит ей 30% маны. Звать её будут просто - Пиала.

😁191🤣124💯2314💩7😈5👍3👏2

15 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC≈22,800 views215 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Если вы вдруг сомневаетесь - не сомневайтесь 🙂 Гриффекс(к) - единственный правильный выбор для тех умных пионэров, кто предусмотрительно взял его на сдачу на Обмене 🙂

😁114💩45👍3310💯7🔥6

13 Sept 2026, 08:02 UTC≈23,700 views228 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Не пропустите :)

👍17225🔥19💩12

9 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC≈32,800 views124 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Ребят, бот прилёг до вечера четверга. Я не дома, оперативно починить не могу.

👍91💔129💩7😢5

7 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈35,700 views147 reactions11 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Солдат спит - служба идёт 😎 ➡️ По гарпиям обратите внимание - хорошие крепкие персы, но имбой не кажутся. В версии Беты была жесть, а на релизе их сильно успокоили. Что не может не радовать - нерфы до релиза мы одобряем сильно больше, чем нерфы после :) P.S. Ссылка на мой оригинальный пост Гудвина - тыц.

😁88👍3214💩7💯3👎1🔥1😢1

5 Sept 2026, 16:20 UTC≈29,700 views222 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Нихрена себе, зацените что бывает в драконьих сундуках 😏 Только что выпало. Там теперь толковые награды, есть смысл уделить режиму хотя бы минимальное внимание 🙂 Лично я трачу минут по 5-10 в день максимум, набеги не закрываю, карту не фармлю. Только квесты/дейлики и слежу за лагерями. Имхо, оно того стоит.

💯108👍74💩14🤣1411🤬1

4 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC≈25,000 views291 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Прошёл, в целом норм. ➡️ Не жопьте элитную расходку, и всё произойдёт. Драконы у меня без доната, только один раз когда-то в начале ПуДр взял. По этапам: 1: пустые 4* 2: пустые 5* 3: недокачанные 4* 4: качаные 4* (только три из них фулл) 5: качаные и не очень 5* 6: основная команда 5* Потно, факт, но и лут категорически хорош 🙂 Финны хитрые, конечно, нашли наконец правильную мотивацию качать драконов 😁

👍210💩25😁2422💯4💔2🤬2👎1

4 Sept 2026, 07:18 UTC≈25,200 views164 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Таки придётся качать, походу 😁 Обратите внимание, это по сути Таверна, т.е. начинаем с очень мелких драконов. ❗️Аккуратно планируйте команды, дракона можно использовать ТОЛЬКО ОДИН РАЗ. Если не качали драконов - да и нахер эти призы, не стоит оно того 😎😁 АПД. Первый уровень - проходится пустыми 5*.

😁83👍589💩6🤬2🦄2😱2💯1

3 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC≈15,200 views91 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @goodwin_ep

Завтра (04.09) зеленый мимик на ящики железа и отрядный корм🤵 Пример мимика ТУТ.

👍64💩224🤣1

3 Sept 2026, 09:53 UTC≈21,000 views260 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Без этого 4е всё равно не настанет, так, что... Погнали в комментах покреативим. Я в храм в игре, опять зайду, И вновь отмееена, с*ка бл*!

😁172🤣52💩15👍119🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 17:39 UTC≈22,600 views283 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @puzzlesfirespiritPhoto

Так и назовём 😁

😁203👍35🔥19🤣1211💩3

1 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC≈21,200 views283 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Мож в принципе его отключить 🤷‍♂😁 Только лут полный шоб выдавали, а топ и так мало кому интересен 😏 #нахерхрам

😁178👍66💯249💩4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @tudan_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Туданыч news (ТНьюз)” (@tudan_news), 26,943 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tudan_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.