Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137,098–137,151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:54
137,112
+8
11 Aug 2026, 08:46
137,104
-41
10 Aug 2026, 10:01
137,145
+4
9 Aug 2026, 11:02
137,141
-4
7 Aug 2026, 18:15
137,145
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:05
137,145
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
1
Videos
36
Links
28
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,764 reactions across 19 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,423
59.4%
🔥
256
4.44%
🥱
195
3.38%
❤🔥
192
3.33%
🗿
169
2.93%
👍
159
2.76%
🥰
142
2.46%
👎
98
1.70%
👏
89
1.54%
🫡
84
1.46%
😁
81
1.41%
🍌
67
1.16%
🤪
66
1.15%
🥴
66
1.15%
💩
53
0.92%
🤨
51
0.885%
👾
43
0.746%
🤬
41
0.711%
🌚
38
0.659%
😢
38
0.659%
28 further kinds
413
7.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,764reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2025 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tubesensei. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 August 2025 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
New video dropped 👆
And this one's different.
I built a full gym app in 10 minutes.
I automated my weekly email report.
I organized my entire downloads folder from one sentence.
All inside Claude. All shown live. No fluff.
If you've been using Claude as just another chatbox — this video is going to change how you see it completely.
Full beginner to advanced. Free plan to Claude Code.
Watch it → https://youtu.be…
Watch this podcast now 👇
Just dropped a power-packed episode where I break down 25 FREE AI tools that can seriously upgrade your video editing and content game.
We didn’t just talk — I showed live workflows using tools like HeyGen, ElevenLabs, and more so you can actually apply it.
If you’re creating content in 2026, this is not optional.
Link: https://youtu.be/PnX6dyYWzSg
🚨 Harsh truth: 90% people who want to be creators will NEVER start… and it’s not because of money 💀
It’s because they’re addicted to excuses like “I need a better setup” 🤥
And meanwhile… a small group is quietly printing content (and money) without any of that 👀
🎙️ I just recorded a completely unfiltered podcast where we proved this LIVE
We built a FULL creator system under ₹1,000/month — no jokes 💸
And honestly… th…
This video is genuinely eye-opening for creators. It shares an 8-year failure story on YouTube, valuable lessons on how to make a comeback everything about creator mindset.. If you are a creator, this is a
Must Watch : https://youtu.be/lJLPSopLdXk?si=_VUYfXDcSY3niAwi
Everyone thinks cinematic TV ads need massive budgets, agencies, and months of work.
But what if I told you one brand hijacked America’s biggest sports event with an AI-made parody ad—built in just 5 days—while others burned millions? If that sounds unreal, this video will hit uncomfortably hard 🎯
I break down how Artlist used AI to flip the entire advertising game—concept, storytelling, production, even execution—u…
Everyone wants to be a content creator… but most people are stuck overthinking. Market is saturated, I don’t have a good camera, I don’t know what to post, I’m not confident on camera. If you’ve said any of this to yourself, this video is going to hit uncomfortably close 🎯
I sat down with my friend Devesh for a completely unfiltered, no-script masterclass. We broke down why it’s actually the best time to start, why …
🚨 I Made ₹8+ lakh in PASSIVE INCOME by selling just DIGITAL PRODUCTS. 🤯🤯
No fancy skills, no big investment, no full-time hustle. Digital products are the simplest & most scalable online business right now. You create once… sell unlimited times.
In this video, I break down the exact beginner blueprint — step by step:
⚠️ Important:
If you skip this video, you’ll keep guessing.
If you watch till the end, I literally…
AI filmmaking has reached a point where a single person can create complete movie scenes without a camera, actors, crew, or visual effects knowledge.
This is possible through Higgsfield AI’s new feature called Cinema Studio. It allows users to generate cinematic shots, control camera lenses and focal lengths (like 50mm or IMAX style), maintain character consistency, and convert still frames into moving sequences.
I …
I know many of you have seen the recent videos made about me by different creators. There have been a lot of allegations — a lot of things being said without knowing the full story.
For the past few days, I chose to stay silent because I didn’t want to add more fuel to the drama. But I kept getting messages from many of you asking what’s actually true and what’s not.
Recently, my friend @MystGrow reached out and a…
🚀 Alight Motion Pro (8 Sept Update) 🚀
New version launched with all PRO features unlocked for free 🎉
✅ Latest release – 8 Sept
✅ No watermark
✅ Smooth & fast editing
Join Now @AditoYT ❤️🔥
⚡ Update now and enjoy next-level editing! 🔥
❤318🗿45🔥34❤🔥26🥰23😐23👍22👏16
Signed ADITO
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tubesensei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2025 to 23 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tube Sensei” (@tubesensei), 137,112 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tubesensei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.