Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

天津音乐学院报告频道

@ttyyxybg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9,929subscribers

-352 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003724788971
TypeChannel
Username@ttyyxybg
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ttyyxybg

Growth

9,92910,28110,1056 August 2026 — 10,281 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,277 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,144 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,096 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,057 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,021 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,988 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,929 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 9 days, net -352. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,876–10,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:239,929-59
11 Aug 2026, 19:259,988-33
10 Aug 2026, 20:1110,021-36
9 Aug 2026, 19:1110,057-39
8 Aug 2026, 17:4110,096-48
7 Aug 2026, 18:1810,144-133
6 Aug 2026, 20:4410,277-4
6 Aug 2026, 20:0510,281first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.78%
avg views ÷ 9,929 subscribers
Avg views / post
375
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.175%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held28 (1 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total10,508
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
72
Links
82

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
685.7%
🤬114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC88 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:诗宁 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:大飞 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.17 【验证时间】:2026-08-09 【过程描述】:车评机器人卡了我好久,隔一周来补个车评。 一句话点评:恃宁老师给的不是女友感,是爱人感。 想约个下午的时间,没想到是头课。到课室楼下等了一会妹子才匆忙赶到,一来就表示不好意思,看在颜值的份上我光速原谅。 妹子有点i人,聊天有点人机感我还一度怀疑是代聊。但其实妹子情商很高,情绪价值是给到满溢出来的。陪浴完出来之后妹子盯着我的胸问哥你胸肌能抖吗?她其实完全知道撸铁男爱表现什么。过程中完事后我夸好几次她身材棒她光抿嘴笑,最后她说我能不知道我身材好吗,但我得让你说。你看这心思多灵啊。 这边打分只有整数,但是颜值身材我想给到9.5分的。 妹子

14 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC189 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:魅影 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:Thor Asgard 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 8 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9 【验证时间】:2024-08-13 【过程描述】:新上榜老师必须去看看,难得拍上了工兵,塘沽也得去看看,老师之前来过不算很新,工农村附近,这个地儿怎么说呢我一共来塘沽出击五六次,这个地方占了三次。。。也算著名景点?找地方停车轻车熟路,上楼交流感情,老师身材不错,主要是比例不错,长腿,没有多余松松垮垮的,还是不错的,颜值中上,皮肤也比较顺滑,聊了几句开始服务,做的最基础的,没加别的,比较简单直接开干,很润滑,后入的角度观看不错,很过瘾。总的来说,老师十分健谈,也挺爱聊,如果能在市区开应该会有更多客,推荐。 萝卜蔬菜,各有所爱,报告仅供参考。

1

14 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC193 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:林uu 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:酸黄瓜 2 号机 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 8 【服务得分】: 8 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 8.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-13 【过程描述】:老师在的地方,是一个豪华的酒店,环境非常的好,见面之后 人照九分像,而且本人比照片还要更瘦一点,所见即所得,简单 py 之后,老师刚下海 是个新人 也比较嫩 十八九岁,嫩妹三件套 之后正式服务 舌吻很配合 可以一直舌,而且人也不机车不催 在床上非常的听话,非常棒的一次体验 喜欢嫩妹的可以去 萝卜蔬菜,各有所爱,报告仅供参考。

11 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC339 viewsread 15 August 2026

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:柔心 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:Fj 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 9.67 【验证时间】:2026-08-08 【过程描述】:第一次cj就发现这位新ls,本想着试试的态度,性价比也很高,而且个人描述的奶子很大,我就忍不住的期待,果断联系ls,ls态度很好,进门一口一个宝贝,亲爱的,衣服里的奶子都快爆出来了,随着身体晃动奶子也在晃动,进门还会问我要不要帮我洗澡,这些都是基础服务,性价比真的很高,然后开始正戏,ls浑身真的很软,用奶子帮我漫游,含淡和口都很舒服,嘴里很软没有咯牙感,虽然一嘴的东北音,但是叫的很骚很浪,服务全程也会问你的感受,疼不疼爽不爽之类的,总之好评,后面ls也忍不住开始主题,整个人趴我身上,我能清楚的感觉到奶子的柔软和重量,腰部真的很

9 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC399 viewsread 15 August 2026

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:蕊蕊 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:明 小 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 7 【综合得分】: 8.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-09 【过程描述】:约了包时,本来约一次,但是看妹妹脱衣服后果断包时了,虽然中途出了点小插曲,但是通过这个小插曲我发现妹妹很诚信,很乖,妹妹口活很一般能感觉到牙齿,不过还是很爽的。一共做了三次,妹妹不喜欢口,第二次就没用,各种姿势都是了,最后让妹妹趴着做的,压在她身上,好爽…妹妹绝对年轻,唯一的缺点就是环境太差了,价格较其他老师较贵,不过周末能有这么乖巧的妹妹陪着我还能有什么不满足的 萝卜蔬菜,各有所爱,报告仅供参考。

7 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC596 viewsread 15 August 2026

回家了兄弟们 https://t.me/aycjdbxj_bot?start=join_vicfyCOVUyQwMDNl

7 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC496 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:图图 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.33 【验证时间】:2026-08-07 【过程描述】:老师20岁左右,很实在的东北姑娘,个子很高,身材比较瘦,由于我的原因让老师早起了,提前沟通好不用化妆,所以颜值看得也是比较真实,可以看出人照完全一致,照片基本只是有一些美白。服务是三点口,我来反向服务,老师反馈比较直观。做的过程和老师充分沟通,老师各种姿势都很配合,最终两人同时达到快乐终点,整体给到好评,7张也很合理。推荐。 萝卜蔬菜,各有所爱,报告仅供参考。

1

7 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC432 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号:H178591399578 🎰 潼潼老师白嫖卷 💁 参与情况:197达标 / 233报名 🔋 人品加成:602票 ⚡️× 9 🎅 联系领奖:小黑 1. 化原⚡️× 9 奖品:潼潼白嫖卷 祝大家心想事成好运连连!

6 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,050 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:诗宁 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:olo 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 9.5 【验证时间】:2026-08-06 【过程描述】:颜值不错的老师,说话轻声细语很温柔,陪浴洗的很仔细,洗完还会帮擦,有一次性浴巾,上床课表有的服务都有,胸推三点口,口活非常舒服,大腿根部和蛋蛋都有照顾到,口活不说停一直口,然后就是戴套开大,女上很有劲很会,换了几个姿势出货,老师全程没有催,态度很好,结束也会帮忙洗洗,完事聊会天撤退。 萝卜蔬菜,各有所爱,报告仅供参考。

1

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC378 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:小梨 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:olo 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 8 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 8.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-06 【过程描述】:老师颜值挺高,跟图片视频基本所见即所得,进屋聊会然后我是洗过了去的就没要求陪浴,自己去洗的,洗完上床服务基本就嫩妹三件套,口活不错,然后就是正事,床感挺好哼唧的挺有意思,换了几个姿势出货,嫩是真嫩,颜值也是挺高,就是没🐍太可惜了。 萝卜蔬菜,各有所爱,报告仅供参考。

1

6 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC331 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:小梨 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:德德德 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 10 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-06 【过程描述】:按指引上楼,开门后见美女,一眼就能认出来,说话很温柔,很爽!坐着聊了会,ls真空,于是开始上下其手,py看到老师的身材太棒了,直接忍不住,洗澡后到床上开干。ls无论身材和颜值都是我的菜,简直不要太爽,主要是pp很圆润,很是喜欢,后来到🛏,做的都很到位,ls侧躺着👄,这个很舒服,手还可以掐pp,太刺激了!👄的很舒服,无齿感,那个圆圆的pp太舒服了,整体是一次很完美的体验,还会再来的 萝卜蔬菜,各有所爱,报告仅供参考。

6 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC376 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

天津音乐学院专属报告 【妹子花名】:蕊蕊 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:化原 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 8 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 5 【态度得分】: 8 【环境得分】: 3 【综合得分】: 7 【验证时间】:2026-08-06 【过程描述】:很高兴能拿下这次竞拍。一见面就感觉老师有点怪怪的,略显神叨。人长得跟照片差不多。进屋后发现环境实在太拉,浴室也脏兮兮的,就一张床,好歹铺了个一次性床单,只能将就了。 进屋后老师问我能不能吃药,直接把我吓了一跳。一看是布洛芬才放下心来,结果她一会儿就吞了两粒,合着把止痛片当糖豆吃。 轮流洗完澡,老师洗完直接往床上一躺。身材确实不错,跟照片基本一致,胸也不小,肤色比照片里还白一点。我跟她亲了两下,说开始吧。老师直接拆套准备让我戴,我说还没口呢,这才开始口。这一口齿感太强了,一点都不舒服。 后来想玩69,老师不太会,于是指导了一下。小穴挺嫩,就是

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ttyyxybg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 785,159 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“天津音乐学院报告频道” (@ttyyxybg), 9,929 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttyyxybg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.