Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

海外商务大业绩🎓(话术,流程,模式)➕➕

@ttttt106

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,943subscribers

-958 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002639388625
TypeChannel
Username@ttttt106
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ttttt106

Growth

8,9439,9019,4227 August 2026 — 9,901 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,836 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,563 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,943 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -958. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,799–10,045 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:068,943-620
11 Aug 2026, 08:569,563-273
8 Aug 2026, 07:029,836-65
7 Aug 2026, 10:319,901first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.512%
avg views ÷ 8,943 subscribers
Avg views / post
45.8
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held29 (8 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,237
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
555.6%
👍333.3%
🔥111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

我是一个善于社交的人,我喜欢和不同年龄的人交朋友,这会让我学习到很多不同的知识和生活上的乐趣,如果有缘分我们可以有更多话题交流 我以前去过***但是我对于这座城市了解不多,如果有机会下次前往你可以带我领略这座城市的精彩 我和你聊天有种我们是老朋友的错觉,我对你很好奇,如果你不介意的话我们可以继续交流 我刚刚告诉了我的朋友我们通过这样错误的方式产生联系的事情,她对这种事情的发生也表示非常好奇,很期待你能来我们的城市的时候相互交流 全球有多少人口,在整个美国3.3亿的人口当中,我们能通过这样的方式相遇,这是一件概率极低的事情,我们都应该珍惜这样的缘分将这种来之不易的友谊即系保持下去 就我在美国生活的这段时间很少尝试这样的交友方式,我很好奇通过这样的方式能够将友谊保持多长的时间,希望你也能珍惜我们这样的关系 我很惊讶。你是一个很容易交谈的人。虽然我们认识的时间不长,但和你聊天让我感觉很舒服、很平静。就像一位久违的老朋友一样

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

客户被骗 或者质疑三方 , 这样的话术 发一下 你以后就都别学习金融投资了。像股票,基金,外汇,黄金,债券就连保险都会有诈骗案例和负面新闻,难道投资者看到这些负面新闻就不投资了吗?只要是金融投资都会负面新闻。 金融投资 有人从中赚钱那么就有人从中亏损,当然很多人亏损之后他们并不是从自身能力找问题,而是去抱怨,发泄他们各种的不满,所以无论做什么,总是避免不了一些负面新闻。 是的,当我们再做同一件事情的时候,这会使我们产生更多的共鸣从而达到同频共振,这对我们之间紧密的联系也有着帮助,而且被人纳入未来也是一件幸福的事情 每个加密钱包都存在一定的负面新闻,这是不可避免的,我们不能将因为这个负面新闻就阻止我们的赚钱的方式。 你要明白一件事情,那就是现在我带你赚钱都是为了我们的将来,如果你都不愿意这么做,甚至连努力都不愿意尝试,那么我认为我可能会重新考虑一下我们之间的关系了,因为我认为你对我们之间的未来是没有规划的,你永

3

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

这需要结合打招呼话术来解释一下。使用诙谐幽默的语气,或者带上一些神的指引之类,因为美国人信封上帝的比较多。一定要做到解除了客户的质疑,又能引起客户的聊天欲望。例如: 1.有时候我还是比较迷信的,我比较相信缘分和命运。 命运的感觉不清楚,你相信命运吗? 我觉得人与人之间相处,是一个非常微妙的过程,最重要的是感觉两个人有共同的话题语言,然后才会有缘分继续下去,不管发生什么事情,不敢你想要什么,一切都如你所愿..天上的某处,上帝有他自己的安排,你觉得呢 ? 2.我认识了一位新的朋友,他叫(客户名字),这是我的荣幸。希望我们有个愉快的交流。 3.说真的,我也不知道你的号码为什么会出现在我的通讯录,这就是我给你发短信的原因,起初我以为我们因为工作联系过,我在XXX工作,你从事什么行业? 4.通过和你聊天,我感觉你是一个值得深交的人,当有一天你来xxx,我可以做你的导游,邀请你吃xxx美味的食物,如果有缘分我希望我们有一天能相见

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC21 viewsread 12 August 2026

客户觉得我们是骗子的应对方案 1.是的。我就是一个骗子。我什么都不缺。我就是骗取能长相厮守终身的人 2.确实,现在网络不规范,骗子很多.但是不是骗子日久见人心,你这么敏感,是不是被人骗过?我觉得无论在网上还是在现实生活交朋友都是要小心,时间才是最好的证明。我相信你每一个经历,都是成长的过程,以后请不要相信别人 3.防人之心不可无,很开心你的头脑会有这个潜意识,有防备心理。说明我没有看错人,现在社会骗子太多,不能去轻易相信一个人。将来对你我想我应该会很放心 4.真聪明,我就是骗子。别人一阵子,我是一辈子 5.我要是骗子,把你卖了你还得帮我数钱 6.对啊,我是骗子,骗你的心,你的人,骗你一辈子

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

平台负面解释 我很欣赏你谨慎的态度,但如果你跟我一样使用它进行了多年的交易并且获取利润,可以从更高的角度出发来进行平台背景的调查,你将不会存在这些疑虑。正是因为了解它们,所以我才会使用它们,并且愿意将它分享给我爱的你。我理解你对待未知事务的谨慎,但实际上这是一种对你自己思想上的禁锢,就像美国建国最初我们甚至不知道联邦政府是否值得信任一样,这就是一个思维转变的过程,我也真诚的希望在我们使用它交易的过程中增加更多我们沟通的话题和提升我们的信任基础。 很多人都因为网络上的一些内容而影响了积极的事情发生,我认为这并不是理智的行为,任何事情都需要自我去验证,就像巴菲特也是一样,它也需要需要通过团队去尝试和验证,才能得到的接近正确的结果,什么事情都有双面性,你有任何问题,可以先问我,我可以帮你解答这一切,因为我在加密货币领域是非常擅自专业的,我们将共同解决问题,这才是我们的初衷,赚钱并不是最重要的,而是培养共同点..... 任何机构

🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

我曾经有幸听到一位成功人士的演讲。他在讲话中说。如果有人和你分享了一个财富的信息,先不要怀疑他们是想赚你的钱,也许是看中了你的人品,或者是想和你合作完成自己的梦想?聪明的人不会直接拒绝别人和你分享的任何信息。相反,他们会思考这些财富信息是否适合他们。也许一个不经意的信息就能实现你的财富梦想。当今时代是一个资源共享、财富共享、合作共赢的时代,我们要珍惜那些与你分享财富信息的人。 沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过,当一个人养成一个省钱的大脑时,那他就不会去培养一个赚钱的大脑。所以他穷的很稳定。 世界上没有人生来就富有。你知道富人和穷人的区别吗? 答案很简单。富人会利用身边的一切资源,而穷人只会抱怨命运的不公。富人之所以富有,是因为他们懂得创造机会和抓住机会。我最喜欢的一句话是:机会只留给有准备的人!市场条件并不总是存在的。抓住机遇很重要 穷人和富人有不同的思维认知。穷人描述问题,而富人解决问题。这就是思维之间的差距 从小我父母就教育我

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

每个人都有梦想 而投资就是让梦想变得有实现可能的工具 真正的投资者 从不害怕波动 因为他们明白市场的起伏 正是机会的节奏 财富从来不是一夜之间的奇迹 而是日复一日 稳健积累的结果 短期的浮动 不是失败 放弃的瞬间 才是最大的损失 方向对了 坚持就是胜利 让时间成为你最忠诚的伙伴 时间 是世界上最昂贵的资产 能让时间为你创造价值的人 才是真正的投资者 很多人辛苦工作一辈子 却忘了让“钱替自己工作” 投资的意义 并不只是赚钱 而是让你拥有“对生活的主导权” 在正确的方向上 哪怕只是小小一步 也比原地踏步更接近未来的自由 在人生的每一个阶段 机会从不缺乏 缺乏的 是看见机会时迈出那一步的勇气 市场不会永远等待犹豫的人 但总会回报那些愿意学习 敢于行动的人 投资不是赌博 而是“有计划的成长” 掌握方法 懂得节奏 您就能让每一次波动 都成为积累财富的阶梯 不要害怕开始 因为没有任何成功是从犹豫中诞生的 在现实的世界里 最大的谎言就是“

1

11 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

洗 赚钱 1.钱是最容易赚的也是最难赚的,主要是看你以那种方式去赚,当你有钱的时候你想法就不一样了,人不能活在当下,要不断的突破自己。 2.穷人会努力工作赚钱,而富人会让钱为自己工作。 3.馅饼来了你都不伸手去接,想拉你一把,找不到你的手,再多的馅饼也掉不到你的手中呀! 因为你思想没有意识去接这个馅饼,所以你只能一直看著、看著,看著馅饼一次次被别人接去。 4.马云曾说过,为什么穷人越来越穷,富人越来越富,而是因为富人敢把钱拿出来,懂得投资勇气挑战;而穷人想的是万一赔了呢?却从来没想过万一赚了呢 5.生活中我们总是会遇到各种突发状况,而大多数状况其实都是可以用钱解决的。如果你没有钱,你就得低三下四地向别人求助,看别人脸色借钱,而且别人还不一定买单。努力赚钱就是为了可以独自应付人生的各种状况。 6.很多时候因为拮据,所以只好去做一些自己不喜欢做的事情。因为人要生存,特别是对我们这种已经成家立业的人来说,可以苦自己,但是不

1

11 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【场馆我们选,责任我们扛|这才是U8的底气】 😀近日某场馆“漏洞事件”闹得沸沸扬扬。 😀有些平台平时欢迎会员来玩,一到会员赢大了,就开始搬出“套利”“内部勾结”“场馆漏洞”等理由,拖审核、卡出款、把责任全甩给玩家。 😀会员赢几百万就开始找借口,问题真在场馆吗?说到底,不是场馆有漏洞,是平台实力有漏洞! 😀U8的态度只有一句:敢让会员玩,就要敢给会员出。场馆是U8精选的,责任就由U8承担。只要会员正常投注、凭本事赢,该出的,一分不少! 😀牛逼不是吹的,实力也不是喊的。平台敢收,更要敢付;会员赢了以后痛快兑现,才是真正的行业底气! 😀 来U8,你尽管赢,出款交给我们! 👍U8官方频道;@u8guoji889 👍U8官方客服;@u8zgl 👍U8官方网址;u8aal.com

6 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC100 viewsread 12 August 2026

lol大笑,我是我的投资顾问,相比依靠别人,我更喜欢依靠我自己,唯有不断的成长,才能让自己在投资的领域独当一面 我很高兴听到你说你很满意你的经纪人,他一定为你赚取了丰厚的收益,我也有我的经纪人团队,他们帮助我管理我的一些长期的投资,我的投资领域很广泛,所以我不会完全依赖我的经纪人,但是我也从未停止学习的脚步,我也一直都在自己做一些投资,我取得了不错的成绩,所以我相信我们总是可以互相学习共同进步的。 财务顾问很多只是为了赚取顾主的佣金。至于顾主赚钱与亏钱。我认为他们是不会关心的。这也是为什么我不喜欢财务经济人为我投资的原因。我通常喜欢在电脑或者手机APP上面操作。这样还可以让我学习到投资股票的知识。我建议你也可以与我一样这样做 每个人的观念不一样。托管人可能对你来说会比较方便。但我不喜欢这样操作。因为有很多的资产顾问只是想要得到佣金。他们不会在乎我们是否有利润。我更喜欢把资金掌握在自己手中。进行手机与电脑在线操作。这样在交

6 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC76 viewsread 12 August 2026

亲爱的,拥有自己的财务顾问是好事,这能让专业的人为你管理你的财务情况也可以节约你的时间去做更多的事情,但是对于你的隐私来说并没有太多的好处,因为我比较看自己的隐私,我可不希望别人知道我的所有资产和资金,还有就是财务顾问会限制我很多的决定,总是会给我一些建议,其实我并不喜欢这样,我喜欢自己做出决定,而不是被别人的想法所左右,当然你也有自己的选择,我只是和你分享我的看法

6 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC71 viewsread 12 August 2026

我不会相信财务顾问的建议,因为我深知一个道理,如果你的财务顾问很擅长投资,为什么他要去为你打工,而不去自己投资?只有你自己学会了投资方式才能更好的管理你的资金 我的朋友曾经被她非常信任的经纪人骗了850k美金。而且她们在一起合作了很多年。最后钱被她的经纪人全部骗走了 相对于你的财务顾问。我有一支更加专业的团队指导我短期黄金期权交易的市场,而且我在美国有一个非常出色分析师我叔叔,她在亚洲金融国际中心和华尔街工作了10年,具有相当强的分析能力每当我在她的教导下进行交易时,她都能给我准确的交易信息,因此我几乎总是赚钱。

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @ttttt106. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 317,638 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“海外商务大业绩🎓(话术,流程,模式)➕➕” (@ttttt106), 8,943 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttttt106.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.