Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for T&T Progress

Channel

T&T Progress

@ttprogress

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,098subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001442711580
TypeChannel
Username@ttprogress
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ttprogress

Growth

5,0985,1505,1247 August 2026 — 5,150 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,150 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,147 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,122 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,113 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,098 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,090–5,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:235,098-15
13 Aug 2026, 01:435,113-9
10 Aug 2026, 07:505,122-25
7 Aug 2026, 14:235,147-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:455,150no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:335,150first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 5,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
763
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held27 (31 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total20,607
Reactions total193
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

193 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥7538.9%
7438.3%
🔥2211.4%
🎉73.63%
🤓63.11%
👏42.07%
👍21.04%
😍21.04%
💯10.518%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC265 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📄 5 документов, в которых абитуриенты чаще всего ошибаются При поступлении за рубеж многие думают, что самое сложное — собрать все документы. На самом деле проблема часто не в количестве документов, а в маленьких ошибках внутри них. Вот 5 документов, которые стоит проверять особенно внимательно 👇 🔹 1. Academic Transcript Ошибка может быть даже в одной цифре или названии предмета. Проверьте: • правильность оценок;

2🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC289 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📄 Abituriyentlar eng ko‘p xato qiladigan 5 ta hujjat Chet el universitetlariga topshirishda ko‘pchilik eng qiyin narsa — ko‘p hujjat yig‘ish deb o‘ylaydi. Aslida esa muammo ko‘pincha hujjatlar sonida emas, balki ular ichidagi kichik xatolarda bo‘ladi. Quyidagi 5 ta hujjatni ayniqsa diqqat bilan tekshirish kerak 👇 🔹 1. Academic Transcript Bitta raqam yoki fan nomidagi xato ham muammo keltirib chiqarishi mumkin. Tek

4

11 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC356 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3👏2🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC476 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

SAT 1200 vs 1500: насколько это меняет ваш список университетов? 🎯 Получить 1200 и 1500 баллов на SAT — это не одно и то же. Особенно если ваша цель — поступление в сильные университеты. 🔹 SAT 1200 Это не плохой результат. Но для некоторых университетов с высокой конкуренцией 1200 баллов может быть недостаточно сильным результатом. 🔹 SAT 1500 1500 — это уже очень высокий результат, который может расширить список

5

10 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC468 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

SAT 1200 vs 1500: bu university list’ni qanchalik o‘zgartiradi?🎯 SAT’dan 1200 olish va 1500 olish — bir xil natija emas. Ayniqsa, maqsadingiz kuchli universitetlarga topshirish bo‘lsa. 🔹 SAT 1200 Bu yomon natija emas. Lekin ayrim yuqori reytingdagi universitetlarda 1200 ball yetarlicha kuchli natija bo‘lmasligi mumkin. 🔹 SAT 1500 1500 — ancha yuqori natija va ko‘proq kuchli universitetlarni ko‘rib chiqish imkonin

6

7 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC720 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

T&T Progress ofline Premium SAT va AP Intensive kursini ochyapti.🔥 📖 SAT Math hamda Reading & Writing bo'yicha chuqurlashtirilgan tayyorgarlik 📘 AP Calculus BC va AP Statistics bo'yicha chuqurlashtirilgan tayyorgarlik 👨‍🏫 Tajribali mentorlar va har bir o'quvchiga individual yondashuv 📝 Muntazam amaliy testlar, xatolar tahlili va progress monitoringi 📚 Mualliflik o'quv materiallari hamda uy vazifalarini tekshirish

6🤓4❤‍🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC818 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bugun sizlar uchun juda katta yangilik bilan bo’lishaman, tayyormisiz? 🥳

❤‍🔥185🎉4🤓2😍2

4 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,040 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Чунки кайнакам у жойга таклиф килинганида борган, ва бизга роса мактаганди, агар кирса жудаям зур универститет деб.

❤‍🔥9🎉1👏1

4 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,040 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хизматларизга рози булийлар. Шунакаям хурсандмиз.

4🎉1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ttprogress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bright Scholarship
@BrightScholarship · 110,390
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“T&T Progress” (@ttprogress), 5,098 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttprogress.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.