Channel
@ttangawi
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,065subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001133163993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ttangawi |
| Description | السعي طريق الوعي | مقالات * فوائد * صوتيات موقع يتضمن المواد بطريقة مرتبة: ttangawi.com |
| Created | 10 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ttangawi |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 6,065 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 6,066 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 6,068 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 March 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,622 |
| Reactions total | 50 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
136 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 65.4% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 29.4% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 2.94% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قال صلى الله عليه وسلم : " أَكثِروا عليَّ منَ الصَّلاةِ يومِ الجمعةِ وليلةِ الجمعةِ فإنَّ صلاتَكم معروضةٌ عليَّ". قالوا : كيفَ تعرضُ صلاتنا عليْكَ وقد أرَّمتَ يعني بليت . قالَ: " إنَّ اللَّهَ حرَّمَ على الأرضِ أن تأْكلَ أجسادَ الأنبياءِ" ينبغي أن نقرأ هذا الحديث من باب الحياء، فكيف يدعونا صلى الله عليه وسلم للإكثار ونحن مقلين، وكيف يؤكد لنا أنه سيعلم بصلاتنا عليه ونحن غير مبالين، هذا مقام شريف فيه صلة بالنبي صلى ال…
❤5👍1
File, posted without a caption
❤2👍2💯1
الحمد لله على تيسيره، صدر بحث: نظرية كمال الشريعة - دراسة في المفهوم والاستدلال والاستثمار A Theory of the Perfection of Sharīʿa (Naẓariyyat Kamāl al-Sharīʿa): A Study in Concept, Demonstration, and Investment رابط البحث في المجلة: https://aust.uni.ye/article/181/1483 تحميل البحث (PDF): https://aust.uni.ye/magazine/sh/2026/13/181/d398e156bbda1b22e46958533dd91acd.pdf [https://t.me/ttangawi/2056] اللهم انفع به واغ…
👍3❤2
File, posted without a caption
❤6👍1
الحمدلله على تيسيره، صدر البحث الثاني ضمن سلسلة أبحاث في نقد الأخلاقيات الطبية وتفعيل الشريعة في المجال الطبي: الأخلاقيات الطبية في الأدبيات الإسلامية المعاصرة - دراسة في الاتجاهات والمنهجيات View of Medical Ethics in Contemporary Islamic Literature: A Study of Trends and Methodologies https://share.google/Lzc6mfBRpCgFzrQaq https://t.me/ttangawi/2054 اللهم انفع به واغفر ما فيه من زلل وصلى الله على نبينا محمد
❤7👍2
تتجدد المظالم وتتوسع على إخواننا في فلسطين، اعتداءات وتخريب وتهجير. نسأل الله أن يفرج عنهم وينصرهم ويرد عنهم كيد المجرمين
💔4❤3
يقول ابن القيم رحمه الله في زاد المعاد في أسباب شرح الصدر : ومنها: العلم، فإنه يشرح الصدر، ويُوسِّعه حتى يكون أوسعَ من الدنيا، والجهل يُورِثُه الضِّيقَ والحَصَرَ والحَبْس، فكلَّما اتَّسعَ علم العبد انشرح صدره واتَّسعَ، وليس هذا لكلِّ علمٍ، بل للعلم الموروث عن الرسول - صلى الله عليه وسلم -، وهو العلم النافع، فأهلُه أشرحُ الناس صدورًا، وأوسعهم قلوبًا، وأحسنهم أخلاقًا، وأطيبهم عيشًا انتهى. وأظن أن من أسباب شرح الصدر…
❤10👍1
هذا الهدوء النفسي وبعد النظر الذي يتغلب على العاطفة صعب جدا، وهو من جوانب العظمة الخلقية في النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، والتي يصل من تأملها لزيادة اليقين بأنه نبي مهدي مسدد من ربه سبحانه جاء في الحديث أن عبدُ اللهِ بنُ أُبَيٍّ قال: قد فعَلوها، واللَّهِ لَئِن رَجَعنا إلى المَدينةِ لَيُخرِجَنَّ الأعَزُّ منها الأذَلَّ. قال عُمَرُ: دَعني أضرِبُ عُنُقَ هذا المُنافِقِ، فقال صلى الله عليه وسلم : دَعْه، لا يَتَحَدَّثُ النَّا…
❤4
#الرمان الإمام ابن القيم, من كتاب مفتاح دار السعادة م2 ص648. ملتقط الصورة : Samuele Schirò
❤5👍1
من المطالب العالية المهمة في هذا الزمان أن يغلب الكتاب الجوال على وقت أحدنا.. نسأل الله من فضله، ونعوذ بالله من ضياع الأعمار #رسائل_الوعي
👍14❤2
معارج الجمال، ١٢٨
❤7👍1
يحضرنا اليوم واسطة عقد العشر، أضيقها مساحة وأثمنها قيمة.. الحمدلله الذي بلغناها إياه، وأرجوه أن يتقبله بقيول حسن. وإنني لأميّز دعوات عرفة، وأعرف ملامحها وهي تُطلّ طوال العام والله أكرم وأكبر.. إنه يوم الدعاء، كما جاء عن الترمذي قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم:" خَيْرُ الدُّعَاءِ دُعَاءُ يَوْمِ عَرَفَةَ، وَخَيْرُ مَا قُلْتُ أَنَا وَالنَّبِيُّونَ مِنْ قَبْلِي : لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّهُ وَحْدَهُ لَا شَرِيكَ لَهُ، لَ…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ttangawi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 184,128 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رسائل..” (@ttangawi), 6,065 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttangawi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.