Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ТЫ ТАМ БЫЛ? (Павел Кукушкин)

@ttambyl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

33,887subscribers

-62 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781994381
TypeChannel
Username@ttambyl
DescriptionРКН №4963695510 Независимый репортёр Павел Кукушкин
Created25 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ttambyl

Growth

33,88733,94933,9186 August 2026 — 33,949 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,931 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,932 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,929 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,922 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,919 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,908 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,902 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,887 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,878–33,958 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:2533,887-15
13 Aug 2026, 00:3833,902-6
11 Aug 2026, 21:3233,908-11
10 Aug 2026, 23:0233,919-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:4133,922-7
8 Aug 2026, 21:0033,929-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:2433,932+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:5033,931-18
6 Aug 2026, 04:3433,949first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.07%
avg views ÷ 33,887 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held57 (1 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total97,858
Reactions total2,444
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,150
Videos
10,300
Links
6,350

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 09m
Average length
1m 36s

Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,022 reactions across 46 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏74336.7%
53126.3%
👍39119.3%
🔥32716.2%
🫡150.742%
🤝80.396%
😁30.148%
👎20.099%
😢10.049%
🤩10.049%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC613 views23 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔥 Будни подразделения «Ночные волки» интербригады «Пятнашка» - занятия на полигоне. Бойцы готовятся в полной боевой выкладке "взять" террикон высотой около 40 метров с уклоном до 45 градусов. Продолжение следует… Ты там был? в MAX

🔥194

14 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC995 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

⚡️ Заявление Зеленского об «обширных территориях», якобы захваченных ВСУ, прокомментировал в прямом эфире Первого канала в программе «Время покажет». Ты там был? в MAX

👍20😁3🤩1

14 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,110 views41 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔥 «Здесь работает "Пятнашка", братья!» Август 2025. Расчёт из двух машин БМ-21 "Град" работает на Константиновском направлении. Ты там был? в MAX

🔥328👎1

14 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,170 views39 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔥 Рубрика «В этот день два года назад»: Боец отряда «Ночные Волки» интербригады «Пятнашка» позывной «Якут» об обстановке в Курском приграничье через неделю после вторжения украинских нацистов. Ты там был? в MAX

31🙏8

13 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈4,850 views49 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

"Обстановка сложная, но справляемся!" Боец "Пятнашки" позывной "Чебу" о ситуации на ЛБС. Ты там был? в MAX

🙏349👍4🫡2

13 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,410 views45 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔥 С трёхсот метров сбил дрон! Боец "Пятнашки" позывной "Варлам" о буднях на передовой И традиционные приветы родным и братьям по оружию. Ты там был? в MAX

🔥349🙏2

13 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,420 views51 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Командир интербригады «Пятнашка» Ахра «Абхаз» Авидзба вспоминает своих Братьев - легендарных командиров Донецкого ополчения, отдавших жизнь за свободу мирных людей Донбасса - Гиви, Моторола, Батя… Быть Воином - жить вечно!!! Смотрите фильм Андрея Кондрашова «Аэропорт» Ты там был? в MAX

🙏387🔥6

13 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,450 views37 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔥Новая рубрика «В этот день два года назад»: Первый репортаж с позиций Дикой Дивизии Донбасса из Курского приграничья! Почти весь цвет интернациональной бригады «Пятнашка» в одном ролике - смотрим, вспоминаем! Ты там был? в MAX

👍22🙏104🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,510 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Боец «Пятнашки» позывной «Август» об обстановке на ЛБС: Бывает затишье, бывает напряжёнка. Моя задача – прикрывать ребят, работать по птичкам. СВД, автомат, «Сайга» - со всем работаю. Мне кажется, они [вражеские дроны] нас стали стороной облетать. Ты там был? в MAX

28🙏11👍8

12 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,570 views54 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Боец «Пятнашки» позывной «Варлам» о проделанной работе на ЛБС: У нас есть отряд «Ночные Волки», и они ведут статистику: за 19 дней на нашей позиции мы с ними уничтожили 60 FPV Ты там был? в MAX

👍369🙏9

12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,560 views53 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔥 Начальник артиллерии «Пятнашки» кавалер Ордена Мужества, Герой ДНР позывной «Сэйн» вспоминает, как ещё совсем юным парнем выбивал ВСУшников на подступах к Донецку в 2014-м в фильме Андрея Кондрашова «Аэропорт». Ты там был? в MAX

🙏454🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,650 views46 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

⚡️ Усилиями двух группировок «Центр» и «Юг» армия России сужает полуохват вокруг Дружковки и приближается к Краматорску. ⚡️ Группировка «Центр», освободив накануне село Торецкое, завязала бои за Новогригоровку и Райское, от которого около 4км до западных окраин Дружковки. ⚡️ Группировка «Юг» продвигается с юга к Дружковке и с востока к Краматорску. Наши лётчики ВКС РФ активно помогают штурмовым подразделениям, накр

🙏414🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @ttambyl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,980 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Втрати інтернаціональної бригади «П'ятнашка» (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…гуманитарку и были подло убиты Химарсом из-за угла https://t.me/ttambyl/1026 https://t.me/ttambyl/1027 #Щербина #Процевский #Краснощок #Водяной #груз200…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТЫ ТАМ БЫЛ? (Павел Кукушкин)” (@ttambyl), 33,887 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttambyl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.