Channel
@tsymbalove
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
378subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002111378757 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tsymbalove |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tsymbalove |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 378 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 377 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 377 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 429 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
65 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 56.9% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 15.4% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 10.8% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продолжаю постить рандомную фигню Сегодня, после почти четырех лет жизни в Аахене, узнал, что по-русски правильно писать "Ахен". Я писал его везде с двумя "а", и произносил тоже. Когда я залез в Вики, меня ждал интересный экскурс в историю. Французское великолепное название я знал, и ленивый голландский "Aken" тоже, но то, что Польша использует латинское название города, для меня стало открытием. Отдельный прикол д…
🔥1
У нас сейчас снова лейоффы, и поэтому я провожу на linkedin больше времени, чем обычно, потому что помню, что коннекты и репосты порой спасают людей. Там мне попалась любопытная задачка, которую, например, ChatGPT Sol на medium не решает, а на high — вполне. Сердечки под постом — коллегам, которым не повезло ❤️
❤13
Домашний этап IOAI только начался, а казахи уже накидывают смешнявок в лидерборд. Забирайте хрустящие местоимения для своих деловых переговоров ❤️
😁5❤1
я вот тут всем рассказывал, что машинный перевод решен везде, кроме corner cases без контекста и прочая, но оказалось, что все сложнее. угадайте, что это в оригинале?
😭7❤1
Вот вам очередной модный вебсайт для слива персональных данных: https://intheweights.com/ Меня нашли Claude, Grok и Deepseek. Gemini промахнулся, маленькие модельки считают меня спортсменом (спойлер: это совсем не так). Я надеялся, что там какой-то пробинг, а там просто спрашивают в промпте: А кто такой %username? Дай 10 результатов и выдай для каждого вероятность и кластеризуют ответы. Предпоследнее меня дико беси…
🤣4🔥2
В этом году на IOAI будут официально участвовать AI модели. Слава роботам! 🤖 Наша олимпиада пока не настолько известна, так что беттинга на полимаркете пока что нет. Но если вам интересно мое мнение, возьмет ли ИИ золото на IOAI — точно возьмет. С учетом того, что золотую медаль получает 1/12 от общего числа участников (и вообще никто не собирается сравнивать модели с кожаными мешками). Если вы вдруг работаете в бо…
❤5👾1🔥1
Буду в среду на обеденной трансляции
Серёжа решил сделать вид что мы ICPC и сделать трансляцию отбора на IOAI) заходите послушать: мы будем обсуждать межнар, участников, задачи и решения, а также позовем наших классных друзей, чтобы пообщаться про соревнования и AI. Ссылки на трансляции: Первый тур пройдет 3 мая с 10:00 до 16:00 Второй тур пройдет 4 мая с 10:00 до 16:00 Третий тур пройдет 6 мая с 10:00 до 16:00 === 3 мая THE PAST. Поговорим с двумя …
❤3👍1
Прочел "Луна жестко стелет" Хайнлайна. Это книга о том, как каторжные поселенцы Луны с помощью чатгпт (ИИ агента, который управляет техническими процессами на спутнике) обретают независимость. Несмотря на то, что книга написана 60 лет назад, читается довольно легко. Как по мне, она чуть ближе к космической опере (типа Основания или Star Wars), чем к научной фантастике, но имеет свое очарование, несмотря на рояли и н…
❤13
Dear colleagues, we are excited to invite you to submit a paper to AIST 2026, the 13th research conference on Analysis of Images, Social Networks, and Texts, which will take place on October 16–18, 2026, at Nazarbayev University in Astana, Kazakhstan. No registration fee: accepted papers are published free of charge with Springer. The main proceedings will appear in LNCS, and the companion volume in CCIS. Important…
🔥3
Колмогоровская сложность В такие графики можно смотреть бесконечно и находить смыслы -- иногда реальные, иногда придуманные. Этот анализ — это не “истина про контест”, а просто один из возможных срезов. Да и в целом, графики не рассказывают всю историю: мы берём шумную систему и делаем вид, что понимаем её по одной картинке 🎰 Рассматривая кривулины, я поймал себя на том, что мне не очень нравится идея “давайте сдел…
🔥2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tsymbalove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,236,514 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“tsymba❤️” (@tsymbalove), 378 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tsymbalove.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.