Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💜دروب النور💜

Channel

💜دروب النور💜

@tsuem

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,318subscribers

-61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001294183174
TypeChannel
Username@tsuem
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tsuem

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@miskjanaa/1638585 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC@tsuem/157037 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC1.0011 hours
@miskjanaa/1638595 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC@tsuem/157038 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC1.0011 hours
@miskjanaa/1638605 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC@tsuem/157039 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC1.0011 hours
@miskjanaa/1638615 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC@tsuem/157040 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC1.0010 hours
@miskjanaa/1638655 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC@tsuem/157041 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC1.0010 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@miskjanaa5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 hours@miskjanaa (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @miskjanaa. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,3186,3966,3576 August 2026 — 6,379 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,381 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,389 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,396 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,386 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,387 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,383 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,359 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,357 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,355 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,347 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,333 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,326 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,318 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,306–6,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:386,318-8
14 Sept 2026, 08:226,326-7
10 Sept 2026, 19:576,333-14
5 Sept 2026, 21:196,347-8
1 Sept 2026, 20:556,355-2
29 Aug 2026, 16:096,357-2
26 Aug 2026, 06:126,359-24
23 Aug 2026, 07:546,383-4
19 Aug 2026, 09:576,387+1
16 Aug 2026, 05:236,386-10
12 Aug 2026, 21:296,396+7
9 Aug 2026, 13:116,389+8
6 Aug 2026, 15:416,381+2
6 Aug 2026, 05:036,379first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 95 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌐لُـ‘ـُسُـ‘ـُتُـاتُ شــُـَبــًَکَْةٌ آلَروٌآئــعٌ🌐 ✅ لُلُقٌنْوُآتْ آلُڊيُنْيُة وُآلُمْحآفُظًة ✅ 👌 🍃 ﮼ تَبَادُلِ قَنَوَاتُ دِينِيَّةٍ ‏𖣠 📩 ╔═.♥.════════════ ۝مزًآمير آݪفــرقــۘـَٰـآن۝ 11k --- ستوريات دينية 06k --- ٱلُـ‘ـُرٌوٌآئـــ‘ـُــــعُ 06k --- قناه القران الكريم 02k --- { محمد ° ° قدوتنا } 03k --- ﴿ وَاذْكُر رَّبَّكَ ﴾ 06k --- دروب النور 07k --- اݪْقُرْآنُ آݪْڪَرِيمُ ࿋ 07k --- ↩️للاشــــــــتــــــــراك ↪️

Signed دعم القنوات صباحا

12 Aug 2026, 01:43 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

هموم الحياة ثقيلة ومشاغلها كثيرة فاحرص أن يكون أكبر همك فيها كيف تحافظ على صلواتك الخمس فكل شيء بعدها سيكون يسيراً وسهلاً ومباركا.💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

12 Aug 2026, 01:43 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed المتفائلة بالله

12 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026

صلاة الفجر ليست مجرد ركعتين هى عهــد صدق مع الله في أول اليوم.. فمن بدأ يومه بسجدةٍ لله، لا يُضيع الله له سعيًا ولا يُغلق له بابًا.. اللهم اجعلنا من اهل الفجر وخاصته.. #صلاةً الفجر💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

11 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC16 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed المتفائلة بالله

11 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026

‏" عجبتُ لمن علم وأيقن أن مع كل عُسرٍ يُسرين، كيف يحزن ؟! تفاءلوا بالخير تجدوه .. وازرعوا الخير تحصدوه .. واسألوا الله من واسع فضله، فهو القائل : و آتاكم من كل ما سألتموه "💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

11 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC40 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏يارب قد أبكي سرًا وتتعالى ضحكاتي جهراً, قد أدَّعي إنني بألف خير وأنت وحدك تعلم ما يؤلمني ومايرهقني وما أريد فخفف عني و إرحم ضعفي وقلة حيلتي💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

11 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC41 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏رُبّما أزعجك الأمس، لكن ما ذنب اليوم أن يرى وجهك عابساً؟!💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

11 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

عندما تستمد قوتك من الله لن تضعف مهما كانت الظروف والصعوبات؛ فالله عونك و توفيقك.💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

11 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC44 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اللهم إنك قلت : ‏فما ظنكم برب العالمين" ‏ وظننا فيك أنك تعفو وتغفر فاعفُ عنا واغفر لنا وارحمنا💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

11 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

وبشر الصّابرين ,هي أكبر أمل في انتظار مانُريد اللهم بشرنا بتحقيق ما صبرنا لأجله 💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

11 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

كلّ شيء ينتظر وقته، لا وردة تتفتّح قبل أوانها ولا شمس تُشرق قبل شروقها، انتظر؛ فالذي لك سيأتيك💜

Signed المتفائلة بالله

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @tsuem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

إدارة تراخيص العلاج القرآني
@alrouqiaa · 22,835
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 September 2026
📚إشراقات فوائد وفرائد🍀
@Eshraqatf · 29,002
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
نور القرآن
@Q_urany · 44,305
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
📡نيوز بوست الطبية📡
@AlFuture · 83,903
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 31 August 2026
ادعيه ، اذكار ، مقاطع قرآن ،
@P_HSHS8 · 84,429
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
طقس المملكة
@tqsksa · 109,799
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💜دروب النور💜” (@tsuem), 6,318 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tsuem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.