Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TS Solution

@tssolution

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,034subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001094299061
TypeChannel
Username@tssolution
DescriptionTS Solution - системный интегратор полного цикла в сфере ИБ и построения ИТ-инфраструктуры. Пишем о защите данных, реальных кейсах, новостях и трендах в мире ИБ. Здесь — анонсы мероприятий, курсов, дайджесты, статьи. Наши соцсети: https://clck.ru/3PsD9j
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tssolution

Growth

6,0346,0396,036.57 August 2026 — 6,039 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,037 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,034 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,033–6,040 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:326,034-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:116,037-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:166,039first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 6,034 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (23 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total12,795
Reactions total291
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,780
Videos
82
Links
1,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 33s
Average length
4m 47s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

291 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54426187168208817628729.9%
🔥7425.4%
5318.2%
👍279.28%
🎉165.50%
🤩93.09%
🏆82.75%
custom 536379543260027565672.41%
😁41.37%
custom 536394496188668678231.03%
10.344%
👀10.344%
🤔10.344%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 291reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tssolution. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC472 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📊 Что умеет SIEM-система помимо сбора и анализа событий? Современные SIEM помогают не только обнаруживать подозрительную активность. Они объединяют данные из разных источников, дополняют события контекстом, автоматизируют отдельные действия при реагировании и поддерживают работу в распределённой инфраструктуре. В карточках рассказываем, как меняется роль SIEM и какие функции помогают специалистам быстрее обнаружива

6custom 54426187168208817624🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC965 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

— Чё там сейчас со штрафами за утечку ПДн? — Не знаю. Давай видео на эту тему глянем? Встречайте наш новый формат «ИБдБ: инструкции» — короткие видео, в которых мы разбираем темы из сферы ИБ, законодательства и бизнеса без лишнего официоза. В первом выпуске говорим о персональных данных: кто считается оператором, за что сейчас штрафуют, сколько бизнесу может стоить утечка и что стоит проверить в своей компании. Б

🔥179custom 54426187168208817627👍1

6 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC984 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Новый бесплатный онлайн-курс: «Защита конечных точек» Конечные точки — это компьютеры, ноутбуки, смартфоны и другие устройства, через которые пользователи ежедневно работают с корпоративными ресурсами. Их компрометация может открыть злоумышленнику путь во внутреннюю инфраструктуру компании. Этот курс подойдет как начинающим специалистам по ИБ, так и всем, кто хочет лучше понимать современные киберугрозы и научить

14🏆8custom 54426187168208817627🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC982 views65 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sumtechconfVideo

🔥 Несем, буквально, новость года: мы, команда TS Solution, анонсируем наш первый форум-фестиваль! «Сумма технологий» состоится 21 октября в Санкт-Петербурге на площадке Cosmos Pribaltiyskaya Hotel. Соберём на одной площадке партнеров и заказчиков, ИТ- и ИБ-руководителей и технических специалистов, бэк-офис, а также представителей законодательной и исполнительной власти — не для презентаций, а для прямого диалога и

🔥33custom 544261871682088176218custom 53637954326002756567custom 5363944961886686782321🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC952 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какой сегодня день?

  1. Среда ☕️25%
  2. 5 августа 🌤16%
  3. День большого анонса 🤫14%
  4. День «Работай как собака» 👨‍💻33%
  5. День отпуска! 🏖12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,210 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📌 ФСТЭК готовит замену приказу № 21 по защите персональных данных ФСТЭК России опубликовала для общественного обсуждения проект приказа «Об утверждении состава и содержания организационных и технических мер по обеспечению безопасности персональных данных при их обработке в информационных системах персональных данных». Документ может заменить приказ ФСТЭК России №21 от 18 февраля 2013 года. Общественное обсуждение п

👍8custom 54426187168208817625😁41👀1

31 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,300 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤝 Первый в России контракт в рамках проекта «Совместная техническая поддержка» UserGate Мы стали первым партнёром UserGate, заключившим коммерческий контракт в рамках программы «Совместная техническая поддержка». Это означает, что наши сертифицированные инженеры смогут самостоятельно обрабатывать до 70% обращений первой и второй линий поддержки — от диагностики до замены оборудования, сохраняя при этом гарантирован

🎉14custom 54426187168208817629🤩74👍2

30 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,170 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔎 Даже после успешного внедрения современного NGFW важно поддерживать политики безопасности в актуальном состоянии Со временем в конфигурации накапливаются дублирующиеся и устаревшие правила, избыточные разрешения и ошибки сегментации. Ручная проверка такой политики занимает много времени, особенно в постоянно меняющейся инфраструктуре. TS Solution предлагает бесплатный аудит правил доступа на базе MIST Insight В

custom 544261871682088176210👍6🔥6

29 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,150 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📋 Можно ли использовать готовый список СЗИ для аттестации по требованиям приказа № 117? К сожалению, такого универсального списка просто не существует. Требования приказа едины, но средства защиты подбирают с учётом класса защищённости, архитектуры и технологий конкретной информационной системы. В карточках объясняем, от чего зависит состав СЗИ и почему решения из чужого проекта не подойдут вашей системе. 🎥 Подроб

custom 54426187168208817627🔥63👍1

28 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,120 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎙 Почему ложные срабатывания WAF требуют внимания Ложные срабатывания часто воспринимают как неизбежную особенность WAF. Из-за этого их начинают игнорировать или компенсировать многочисленными исключениями. На практике большое количество ложных срабатываний обычно указывает на проблемы с настройкой. Если легитимные запросы регулярно блокируются, администраторам приходится ослаблять политики защиты или отключать отд

custom 544261871682088176254🔥4👍1

24 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,280 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🖥 Формальный подход к 152-ФЗ сегодня может обойтись бизнесу значительно дороже, чем несколько лет назад После повышения штрафов компаниям стоит заново проверить, как они собирают, хранят и передают персональные данные. Одних правильно оформленных документов уже недостаточно: установленные процедуры должны выполняться на практике. В карточках перечислили основные пункты для самопроверки. Подробный разбор изменений

👍8custom 544261871682088176285🤩2🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC≈1,210 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📖 Новая статья на TS University: «Аномалии под контролем: всё о пользовательских правилах профилирования в PT NAD» Пользовательские правила профилирования (ППП) появились в PT NAD ещё в версии 12.0, но при работе с ними у многих инженеров возникают вопросы. Почему правила не обучаются? Какой объём трафика нужен? Что делать с ошибками «Недостаточно узлов» и «Недостаточный объём данных»? Мы столкнулись с теми же вопр

custom 544261871682088176275🔥4🎉2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tssolution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTCAnonymous Poll183 voters

Какой сегодня день?

  1. Среда ☕️25%
  2. 5 августа 🌤16%
  3. День большого анонса 🤫14%
  4. День «Работай как собака» 👨‍💻33%
  5. День отпуска! 🏖12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 92,260 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TS Solution” (@tssolution), 6,034 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tssolution.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.