Я этот отзыв даже без редакции оставлю , он про уровень глубины на который мы ныряем, а еще, если вам интересно, я могу сделать расклад публичный и его вам по понятиям разложить)
❤19

Channel
@tsoylitachannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
10,893subscribers
-149 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001122471130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tsoylitachannel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tsoylitachannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 10,893 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 10,905 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 10,914 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:33 | 10,917 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:53 | 10,929 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 10,936 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 10,939 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 10,940 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 10,942 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 10,951 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 10,956 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 10,958 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 10,962 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 10,971 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 10,973 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 10,978 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 10,986 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 10,993 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 10,999 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 11,003 | first reading |
75 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 73,379 |
| Reactions total | 3,572 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,284 reactions across 75 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,212 | 60.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1,125 | 21.3% | |
| 👏 | 240 | 4.54% | |
| 👍 | 195 | 3.69% | |
| 🙏 | 130 | 2.46% | |
| 💯 | 102 | 1.93% | |
| 🥰 | 90 | 1.70% | |
| 😁 | 60 | 1.14% | |
| 💔 | 46 | 0.871% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 0.341% | |
| 😍 | 16 | 0.303% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 0.227% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 0.132% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.114% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.057% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.057% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.057% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.038% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.038% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.038% | |
| 7 further kinds | 10 | 0.189% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,284 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tsoylitachannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я этот отзыв даже без редакции оставлю , он про уровень глубины на который мы ныряем, а еще, если вам интересно, я могу сделать расклад публичный и его вам по понятиям разложить)
❤19
Мы нарастили Боне уголочки-реснички и как красиво) Девочки, че-то зреет у меня желание Таро взять, есть желающие на расклад за донат?) Все, кто отметится в комментах - напишу вам в личные сообщения и приступим)
❤38🔥22
Такая сегодня карта дня - Император. Эта карта приходит не тогда, когда вам нужна помощь. Она приходит тогда, когда пора вспомнить, что вы сами уже способны стать для себя той силой, которую всё это время искали снаружи. Поэтому сегодня могут особенно остро проявиться темы границ, денег, работы, ответственности, договорённостей, власти и отношений с людьми, которые привыкли решать за вас. И где-то придётся не воева…
❤52
Вечер первого сентября. Сегодня мы все так или иначе находимся под огромным эгрегором Знаний. Миллионы детей пошли учиться, кто-то впервые, кто-то уже привычно волоча рюкзак, слегка подвывая, что лето закончилось. Или вприпрыжку, мои вон копытом бьют, у нас 3 сентября первый школьный день. Начинается новый цикл обучения, и мне подумалось, что именно сегодня очень правильно рассказать вам подробнее об одной работе, ко…
❤37👍8
Я ее оживила) но вот чтобы синхронно спеть песню - это надо прям поиграться и стоить такая генерация в целом будет 200-300 долларов. Денег на поиграться пока нет, поэтому просто нарезка выступления моей дивы )
🔥25👍8👏3
Друзья, буду рада если подпишитесь на мой канал на YouTube. Там будет только музыка, качество я вам обещаю. Для меня это офигенно крутой процесс - создание песни ) https://youtu.be/9mrdGhMFenI?si=wUt4Fi27wVOf17Zf
🔥18👍2🥰2
Поэтому ничего я вам не расскажу 😌😂
👍23😍6
File, posted without a caption
🔥34❤12👍3
Ребятаааа, я написала новую песню, и считаю ее просто охренительной. И думаю пора уже немножко рассказать вам, где во всём этом заканчивается автор и начинается ИИ. Потому что со стороны иногда кажется: ну а что, сейчас любой дурак может сделать песню. Нажал кнопку, нейросеть спела, понесли Грэмми. Технически, наверное, да. А вот сделать песню, которую через двадцать секунд не хочется переключить, может уже далеко …
👏25🥰5👍3🔥1
Не коммерции ради а развлечения для делаю я такие ролики, по мотивам своих чувств) Люблю такое) И песня тут очень неслучайная. Кто вспомнит, откуда эта прекрасная музыка Евгения Доги?)
❤42🔥10
Сохраните себе основные подсказки)
❤48🔥8
Я бы назвала сентябрь месяцем второго Нового года. Только без шампанского, курантов и обещания себе с понедельника начать новую жизнь. Здесь всё несколько серьёзнее: сначала жизнь аккуратно подводит тебя к тому месту, где ты уже давно всё понимаешь, а потом спрашивает: ну и сколько ещё будем делать вид, что нет? Причём вопрос будет задан не в красивой метафизической дымке, а вполне бытовым языком: через деньги, дедл…
❤49👏7
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @tsoylitachannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЦОЙЛИТА ЧЕЛОВЕКОВЕД” (@tsoylitachannel), 10,893 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tsoylitachannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.