Channel
@tsentrral
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001649242371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tsentrral |
| Description | Тривиальная повседневность |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tsentrral |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5235469016750898720 | 19 | 26.4% | |
| 🤡 | 15 | 20.8% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 16.7% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 11.1% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| 🗿 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 2.78% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2024 to 5 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tsentrral. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 November 2024 to 5 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я - последний выживший канала, обращаюсь к своей аудитории после длительных попыток установить контакт с внешним миром: есть ли там, за просторами канала, жизнь - слышны ли мои последние бормотания и не сошел ли я с ума после долгих одиночных скитаний в поиске цивилизации? Я вышел в свет, стою на горизонте и визуальная оценка периметра жизнь не застала. Если вы так-же скрыты, как и я, отправьте любой радио-сигнал, д…
❤2🏆2👀1
Меня возмущает тот факт, что вы не отписываетесь, братия. А ну освободили быстро сводку своих каналов от Gulagà. Спасибо
🤡3
Молчаливый пост и дело принципа
🤡3
Канал заброшен, дамы и господа. Благодарю всех причастных за составленную компанию, что так или иначе послужило поводом для подбора более персонализированных постов, заставив рассмотреть разнообразного сорта материал. Всяк, кто состоял тут из особого почтения ко мне заслуживает отдельных благодарностей, на что у меня не хватит слов. Глубоко признателен, что почтили своим визитом и дальнейшим вниманием к сему скромно…
Никто не может видеть выше себя. Этим я хочу сказать, что человек может видеть в другом лишь столько, скольким он сам обладает, и понять другого он может лишь соразмерно с собственным умом. Если последний у него очень невелик, то даже величайшие духовные дары не окажут на него никакого действия, и в носителе их он подметит лишь одни низкие свойства, т.е. слабости и недостатки характера и темперамента. Брат Артур про…
custom 52354690167508987204👎1
Если что, братья мои, никнейм писал я сам, дабы вы наконец подумали, что пришел я к счастью, хоть и запоздал с темой листовок лет так на 5.
🤡4
Ничто так не дезориентирует человека, не верящего в существование искренних чувств, как встреча с искренним чувством. Перебрав все возможности объяснить его лицемерием, лестью, мистификацией, шантажом, человек отступает, бессильный понять это таинственное явление.
❤2🤡2👎1
Друг, все, что ты любил, разочаровало тебя: разочарование стало вконец твоей привычкой, и твоя последняя любовь, которую ты называешь любовью к «истине», есть, должно быть, как раз любовь — к разочарованию.
custom 52354690167508987204🗿1🤡1
Photo, posted without a caption
👎2🗿2custom 52354690167508987202
Мы трудимся лишь над тем, чтобы заполнить свою память, оставляя разум и совесть праздными. Иногда птицы, найдя зерно, уносят его в своем клюве и, не попробовав, скармливают птенцам; так и наши педанты, натаскав из книг знаний, держат их на кончиках губ, чтобы тотчас же освободиться от них и пустить их по ветру.
⚡3
Цифра, хоть и случайна, но точно описывает мой путь. До 20 лет строгой серьезной литературы, а после полная капитуляция в угоду соц сетям и работе. Меняться будем
Целых лет двадцать человек занимается каким-нибудь делом, например читает римское право, а на двадцать первом — вдруг оказывается, что римское право ни при чём, что он даже не понимает его и не любит, а на самом деле он тонкий садовод и горит любовью к цветам. Происходит это, надо полагать, от несовершенства нашего социального строя, при котором сплошь и рядом люди попадают на своё место только к концу жизни.
🤡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tsentrral. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,322,167 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gulag” (@tsentrral), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tsentrral.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.