Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𐌺ᥲrᴛiss .

@tryillitKartisss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

120subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003966621372
TypeChannel
Username@tryillitKartisss
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 15 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tryillitKartisss

Growth

1201221219 Aug 2026, 00:00 — 122 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:32 — 122 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 20:31 — 120 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:009 Aug 2026, 20:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 20:31120-2
9 Aug 2026, 03:32122no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:00122first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
132.9%
avg views ÷ 120 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,233
Reactions total67
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
1m 36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52404723744778898672327.1%
custom 54002133794260475231720.0%
custom 53596481048050730801011.8%
custom 5359462832800826342910.6%
custom 5361857586305989430910.6%
custom 539799484842903638778.24%
custom 524046038292919619755.88%
custom 526490303751576437444.71%
custom 540900519466083217411.18%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

на передали эстафету! ᥴуᴛь ϶ᥴᴛᥲɸᥱᴛы ʙ ᴛ᧐ⲙ, чᴛ᧐ ᥰ᧐ᥴ᧘ᥱ ᥰуδ᧘ᥙκᥲцᥙᥙ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛᥲ ʙᥲɯᥲ ᤋᥲдᥲчᥲ ρ𐐫ʙн᧐ дᥱнь нᥱ ᤋᥲ᥊᧐дᥙᴛь ʙ κ᧐ⲙⲙ, ʙᥲɯᥙ ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴчᥙκᥙ д᧐᧘жны ʙыᥴκᥲᤋᥲᴛь ᥴʙ᧐ᥱ ⲙнᥱнᥙᥱ ᧐ ʙᥲᥴ ᥙ ᥴκρыᴛь ᥰ᧐д ᥴᥰ᧐ᥔ᧘ᥱρ передаю эстафету @asylum_cvg @thaiProdusers @rideordieoi

custom 54002133794260475233custom 52404723744778898671

4 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC88 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖➖ угадай айдола по размытому фото ✨ 🎀 всего 10 раундов 🎀

custom 52404723744778898679custom 54002133794260475232

4 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

в итоге игра:) сейчас пойду готовиться

custom 52404723744778898672custom 54002133794260475231

4 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC118 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

что проведем вечером?

  1. игру67%
  2. анон42%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC99 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

профайлы на 10-15 заявок 4/15

custom 52404723744778898674custom 54002133794260475232

31 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC178 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

🎀 как думаете вы пройдете?

  1. да!! я уверена13%
  2. нет(16%
  3. еще не подала,но подам6%
  4. не буду подавать71%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC418 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎀. 🤩🎀𝞄𝗱𝝸𝘁𝝸๋𑄝ֺ𝗻۪ 🎀 🎀 𝐓𝗿ue i𝗿𑄝ֺh𝝰ֺ 🤩 ฅׁׅ ׅ . – ࣪ ִ 𖥔 ۫ ּ ֗ -- ‐- ࣪ ִ 𖥔 ۫ ּ – ֗ ׂׂ ฅׁׅ ׅ . 🤩 🎀 𝐅𝗿𝝴𝝴 :: i𝗿𑄝ֺh𝝰ֺ 🎀𝐁𝞄𝘀y :: 𑄝ֺ𝘁4 🎀 📰 @tryillitKartisss 🤩 🎀🤩 𝝰ֺ𝗻۪𝗸𝝴𝘁 & 𝗿𝞄𝗹𝝴𝘀 𝝸𝗻۪ 𝗰𑄝ֺmm🎀

custom 52404723744778898675custom 54002133794260475234

30 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC191 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

у нас плохие новости ( к сожалению у нас ушла участница мэтч😭 нам очень жаль что ушла такая талантливая участница(( причина ее ухода: не хватает времени. всей компанией ей спасибо! за участие в этом проекте ❤️ желаем ей успеха в дальнейшем! мы сделаем набор на ироху в следующим посте

custom 52404723744778898672custom 54002133794260475232

24 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC291 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

🎀𝗻۪𝝴w 𝗽۪𝗿𝝰ֺ𝗰𝘁𝝸๋𝗰𝝴 🤩🎀 🫧🎀𝗳𝗿𝝾̷𝗺ׁ︩︪ : 𝗿𝗲۫𝗻፝֟𝗲۫ 𝘀𑄝ֺ𝗻۪𝗴 :: sׅ𝝴ׅᦅ𝗎𝗹 𝗰ׅı𝘁ֺყ напишите в комментариях как вам

custom 53594628328008263422custom 53618575863059894302custom 52649030375157643741custom 53596481048050730801

22 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC231 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎀 🤩🎀𝝸๋𝗻۪𝗴𑄝ֺ ! 🎀 н𐐼 𝗰ׅк𐐫льк𑄝ֺ вы п𐐫𝘅ожи н𐐼 🎀🤩 🎀ꫀׁׅܻ݊ꪀe ꭈׁׅ 🎀п𐐫кɑׁׅжите рꫀׁׅܻ݊зультат в к𑄝ֺмментɑׁׅриях 🎀 ✈️@tryillitKartisss ➿➖➿➖➿🎀➿➖➿➖➿

custom 52404603829291961974custom 53594628328008263423custom 53596481048050730802custom 53979948484290363872custom 52649030375157643741custom 54090051946608321741

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tryillitKartisss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTCFinal Results12 voters

что проведем вечером?

  1. игру67%
  2. анон42%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

🎀 как думаете вы пройдете?

  1. да!! я уверена13%
  2. нет(16%
  3. еще не подала,но подам6%
  4. не буду подавать71%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 935,252 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𐌺ᥲrᴛiss .” (@tryillitKartisss), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tryillitKartisss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.