Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Try Except Me

@try_except_me

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

353subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002547248560
TypeChannel
Username@try_except_me
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/try_except_me

Growth

3533553547 August 2026 — 355 subscribers8 August 2026 — 355 subscribers13 August 2026 — 353 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 353–355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:23353-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:45355no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:00355first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.3%
avg views ÷ 353 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 October 20253 August 2026)
Views total181
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

473 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14831.3%
11323.9%
custom 53550364566854221938818.6%
👍6513.7%
custom 5449857802593901902275.71%
👾51.06%
40.846%
40.846%
🌚40.846%
🎅40.846%
custom 525819674243578704030.634%
👏30.634%
❤‍🔥20.423%
🤩20.423%
👨‍💻10.211%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 473reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @try_except_me. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 October 2025 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC181 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐱 Раз уж я снова сдаю домашки через GitHub, решила привести в порядок свой профиль. Создала я его ещё в 2023 году, и всё это время мой README состоял из одной строчки текста 😅 Заодно собрала небольшую подборку инструментов, которые могут пригодиться, если тоже захотите немного прокачать свой профиль ⤵️ ✴️ Анимированная строка текста. Можно выбрать любой шрифт из Google Fonts, настроить скорость, цвета и сразу посмо

custom 535503645668542219312👍4🔥3🤩2

10 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC467 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У меня официально начались каникулы в курсе по JS 😁 Поэтому решила воспользоваться моментом и написать небольшой апдейт. Что успела изучить: ⚙️ Инструменты для разработки на JS: 🤩Eslint - линтер, который теперь живёт у меня в VSCode и регулярно сообщает, что я опять сделала что-то не так. Очень удобно. 🤩Prettier - форматтер, чтобы код в проекте выглядел так, как будто его писал один человек. 🤩Parcel - использую дл

9custom 53550364566854221939🔥2👾1

11 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTC585 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Искала ресурсы, которые мне помогут перестать бояться базового синтаксиса JS, потому что практики в подготовительном курсе мне не хватило. А теория без практики живёт в моей памяти примерно до следующего открытия браузера. Делюсь находками ⤵️ 1️⃣ Exercism. Бесплатный трек по JavaScript: теория + задачи разной сложности. Отлично подойдёт тем, кто запоминает синтаксис исключительно через руки (это я 🙋🏻‍♀️). Но самое

🔥7custom 535503645668542219375👏3👾1

28 May 2026, 11:08 UTC577 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я всё ещё тут 😅 И внезапно обнаружила, что давно не писала апдейты. Исправляюсь. 👨‍💻 На работе отправили на курс по JS, и вот что меня удивило: К старту надо было уже знать основы: базовый синтаксис, DOM, встроенные инструменты. Мини-курс по этому всему мне любезно выдали заранее с рекомендацией "успеть за пару недель" 😐 Вроде справилась, хотя после Python некоторые вещи в JS вызывали у меня примерно такой вопрос:

custom 53550364566854221931711🔥7👍3❤‍🔥1👨‍💻1

5 Feb 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,050 views57 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

У меня недавно спросили, в чём я вообще пишу код, поэтому решила поделиться И нет, не в блокноте. Мой путь в айти был драматичным, конечно, но не настолько. С самого начала я поставила себе VS Code, и до сих пор он со мной - и на работе, и в своих проектах. "Из коробки" это просто редактор, а дальше начинается путь "ещё один плагин и точно хватит". Вот мой минимальный набор: 🖥 Python База для работы с Python от M

🔥2820custom 53550364566854221935👍2👾2

26 Jan 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,000 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🗺 Решила сделать навигацию, чтобы каждый смог найти что-то интересное для себя, и для этого не надо было перелистывать весь мой поток мыслей 😅 Но сначала пара строк обо мне, вдруг кто-то не знал или забыл ⤵️ Я успела поработать в экономике, на фрилансе, занималась графическим дизайном и иллюстрациями, а сейчас работаю разработчиком в инфраструктуре. Тут делюсь своим неидеальным опытом: учёбой, собесами, тестовыми

👍238🔥3custom 53550364566854221931

20 Jan 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,410 views41 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

📒 Дочитала "Чистую архитектуру" Роберта Мартина - и да, мне понравилось. Эта книга не из серии "прочитал и стал архитектором", но она учит смотреть на код глубже, а не только думать о том, как правильно расставить папки в проекте. ✏️ Какие мысли "дядюшки Боба" особенно зашли: 🤩 "Фреймворки - это инструменты, а не образ жизни". Сегодня Django, завтра - FastAPI, послезавтра - что-нибудь ещё. И код не должен падать п

15custom 535503645668542219313🔥10custom 52581967424357870402👍1

18 Jan 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,220 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💡 Где я брала идеи для учебных проектов (спойлер: не из космоса и не из снов). Меня иногда спрашивают: А где ты вообще брала идеи для проектов, когда изучала бэкенд? Отвечаю честно, без пафоса и мотивационных цитат уровня "просто поверь в себя, а Django сам напишет код". Как было, так и рассказываю. Один из самых рабочих способов - вакансии. Да, просто вакансии. Я откликалась на всё, что видела: 🤩 даже если казал

🔥1711custom 53550364566854221936👍1

6 Jan 2026, 08:16 UTC904 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я: "Отдых, книги, печеньки, никакого кода хотя бы пару дней". Также я через пять минут: "О, новый инструмент, надо попробовать". Недавно услышала про ty - это новый сверхбыстрый чекер типов для Python. Language server написан на Rust, так что да, "быстро" - это не просто слоган. Я уже жила с Pylance + mypy, поэтому руки сами потянулись пощупать новинку. Поставила расширение для VS Code, посмотрела и делюсь впечатле

84🔥2custom 53550364566854221932👍1👾1custom 52581967424357870401

30 Dec 2025, 07:26 UTC731 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я не человек итогов года, но раз теперь у меня есть дневничок, почему бы не оглянуться на версию себя год назад 👀 Так вот год назад я: 🤩 получила диплом в Нетологии 🤩 писала ботов, парсеры и ботов с парсерами 🤩 зарабатывала фрилансом 🤩 знала, что в 2025 буду зарабатывать кодом Что было в 2025: 🤩 коммерческие проекты, а потом и работа 🤩 заглянула в алгоритмы и даже выжила 🤩 завела этот канал "просто попробовать", а

custom 5449857802593901902228🎅4🔥4custom 53550364566854221934

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @try_except_me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 610,850 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Try Except Me” (@try_except_me), 353 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/try_except_me.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.