Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trump

Channel

Trump

@trumpfarm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,213subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002606808749
TypeChannel
Username@trumpfarm
Created19 June 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/trumpfarm

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2132,2632,2386 August 2026 — 2,263 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,263 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,258 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,256 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,254 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,251 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,246 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,238 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,229 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,223 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,221 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,216 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,213 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 37 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,206–2,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 07:002,213-3
8 Sept 2026, 06:392,216-5
3 Sept 2026, 08:442,221-2
30 Aug 2026, 21:342,223-6
28 Aug 2026, 00:332,229-9
24 Aug 2026, 16:122,238-8
20 Aug 2026, 19:142,246-5
17 Aug 2026, 16:542,251-3
14 Aug 2026, 21:282,254-2
11 Aug 2026, 20:132,256-2
9 Aug 2026, 06:112,258-5
6 Aug 2026, 06:012,263no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:392,263first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 19 June 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,892 reactions across 11 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍64534.1%
61932.7%
🤬1105.81%
🔥1055.55%
👎562.96%
custom 5361939671720926182492.59%
😁492.59%
🤡452.38%
custom 5370955972011366737432.27%
custom 5375170473095077321351.85%
🥴311.64%
🖕251.32%
🤯231.22%
custom 5219872564569972166150.793%
90.476%
🥱90.476%
custom 525588157896957492980.423%
custom 535305890341848852470.37%
custom 534820585666196997630.159%
🎃30.159%
1 further kind30.159%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,892 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 24 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 11 we hold a reading for · 91%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trumpfarm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2025 to 24 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2025, 19:59 UTC≈4,230 views62 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

It's hard to wait, but I understand you well.

38👍15custom 53709559720113667375😁4

6 Sept 2025, 12:45 UTC≈4,780 views50 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026

For many reasons, I stopped posting anything on the channel, now I'm posting bots that collect money on the channel, whether you want to play or not, so that you don't get bored, of course, what's your opinion?

24custom 53751704730950773217😁6custom 53709559720113667375🔥3🤨3custom 52198725645699721662

26 Aug 2025, 21:08 UTC≈5,490 views81 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I wonder what we are waiting for?

👍4010🥱9custom 53709559720113667379custom 53619396717209261827🎃3🤯3

30 Jul 2025, 16:55 UTC≈11,400 views246 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hey millionaires, what's up?

121🤡41🥴31custom 537095597201136673724🤯10custom 5375170473095077321109

8 Jul 2025, 16:21 UTC≈12,000 views157 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Who spent how much money, i.e., crypto tons, on this game? 1️⃣) 5️⃣0️⃣➕ 2️⃣) 3️⃣0️⃣➕ 3️⃣) 1️⃣0️⃣➕ 4️⃣) 1️⃣🔤5️⃣➕ 5️⃣) I didn't spend any money.

👍7641🤬27custom 53619396717209261827🤡4🤯2

6 Jul 2025, 17:48 UTC≈11,600 views310 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Like and vote for the channel and wait, I'm waiting for 300+ likes for each post, the more active you are, the faster the action will be.

👍15268🤬22🔥13custom 536193967172092618212🖕10custom 52558815789695749298custom 53751704730950773218

6 Jul 2025, 17:46 UTC≈11,100 views193 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

We have 30k+ subscribers per month on our bot and 100k+ subscribers on our channel, it's hard to believe, are they active?

👍9343🤬20🔥14👎11custom 53619396717209261825custom 52198725645699721664custom 53530589034184885243

6 Jul 2025, 16:08 UTC≈10,200 views199 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

we need to find active followers, if you are active, subscribe and wait. thanks😀

81👍60🤬19👎13🔥9😁9custom 53751704730950773215custom 52198725645699721663

6 Jul 2025, 10:37 UTC≈12,900 views156 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/trumpfarm

85🤬22😁14👎9🔥9custom 53619396717209261826custom 53530589034184885244custom 53751704730950773214

24 Jun 2025, 20:28 UTC≈10,900 views285 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍13766🔥46👎13😁10custom 53619396717209261827🤯6

19 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTC≈9,470 views153 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Скора 🎉 on a good day🥳

👍7242🖕15🔥11custom 53619396717209261825👎3🤯2custom 52198725645699721662

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @trumpfarm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trump” (@trumpfarm), 2,213 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trumpfarm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.