Photo, posted without a caption
❤10

Channel
@truffle_Penioza
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,602subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002902894886 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @truffle_Penioza |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/truffle_Penioza |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 1,602 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 1,603 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 1,604 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 1,605 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 1,605 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
362 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 210 | 58.0% | |
| 🔥 | 132 | 36.5% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 2.49% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 1.66% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.276% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 362reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10🔥6😍1
Моя весна 😍 Нежная, тающая, свежая, с приятным послевкусием. Базилик и яблоко с клубникой отлично чувствуются. Зелёный декор делала специально как молодые весенние листочки
❤28
🧐Кто из вас до сих пор не был на вебинаре по шоколадным плиткам? Нужно исправлять эту ситуацию! Вы видели, как у нас залетело видео про плитки с матрешками? Там уже больше 14 тысяч лайков и около 200 тысяч просмотров. 😬И почти 600 одинаковых сообщений в директе «Как это сделать? Где взять?» Это в очередной раз подтвердило простую вещь: шоколадные плитки — один из самых коммерчески успешных форматов с вау-эффекто…
❤19
РЕЦЕПТ МЕДОВОГО ГАНАША 🍯 👉 Делюсь авторским рецептом из курса по шоколадным плиткам «ШокУми» — программы для тех, кто хочет работать по безошибочной, выверенной базе и выпускать визуально сильный продукт: ❣️брать готовые коммерчески успешные рецептуры, ❣️формат, который и так прекрасно продается, ❣️и дополнить его своим уникальным предложением — шоколадной открыткой. ИНГРЕДИЕНТЫ: 🔸 Сливки 35% - 100 гр 🔸 Пюре из …
❤61🔥9😍3
Мой Хетао Каждая конфета отдельный шедевр. Вкус необыкновенный, игра текстур отдельная любовь 😋 делала первый вариант, но ещё хочу сделать второй с пастой пекана. Отлично ганаш ведёт себя в корпусных. В силиконовой форме делать скорлупки то ещё "удовольствие")) , заказала поликарбонатную форму.
❤31🔥18
Ура, вот и моя Лампочка😍
🔥59❤18❤🔥6
🙄Думаете, капсула под трюфель — это просто красивая «юбочка», чтобы конфета выглядела аккуратно и не пачкала руки? 👌На деле — это продуманное решение, которое закрывает сразу несколько задач. ЗАДАЧА №1️⃣ — сохранить аккуратный внешний вид Трюфель округлый объект с очень маленькой площадью опоры. ➡️ Поэтому при любом движении он смещается внутри капсулы. ➡️ Это не дефект изделия и не ошибка упаковки, а следствие ге…
❤24🔥13🤯1
Моя мини-пасека 😍
🔥27❤7👍2
Очень неожиданный вкус и прекрасный аромат. Не ожидала, что ганаш так круто может держать внутри жидкую начинку, я в восторге 😋 Соты из белого и карамельного шоколада смешала, очень красивые и дополнительный вкус при дегустации. Очень интересное сочетание даёт лимонный мёд с пикантным ганашем, никогда бы не подумала что на облепихе как вкусно будет 😍
❤1
Посадила начинку ещё в корпус, тк ганаша оставалось много и уже становился плотным, что усложнило задачу, и для себя отметила, что если его делать для корпусных конфет, то затягивать (темперировать) не нужно, он отлично в корпусе стабилизируется
👍7❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @truffle_Penioza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 681,194 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Трюфели предобучение с Ольгой Пениоза” (@truffle_Penioza), 1,602 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/truffle_Penioza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.