Channel
@trudyagatopgeom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
215subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002527330949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trudyagatopgeom |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trudyagatopgeom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 215 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 212 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 213 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 211 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 210 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 206 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 206 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
174 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5388741779476459804 | 71 | 40.8% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 12.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5785004657730391589 | 16 | 9.20% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 8.62% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 5.17% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 💅 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 2.30% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 2.30% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.575% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По результатам опроса предлагаю ввести "#" к задачам вида "простая" / "сложная" и тд. А сегодня будет #простая (Я клянусь она не сложнее 9.2/3 региона): Пусть А - множество закрытых отрезков над R. Найдите все функции f : R -> A удовлетворяющие 3 условиям: • x є f(y) <=> y є f(x) • |x-y|>2 => f(x)∩f(y) = ∅ • для всех 0≤r≤1. f(r) = [r²-1, r²+1]
🔥2🤣1
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
В связи с явной неактивностью обсуждений в канале я хотел бы узнать что не так: (конечно если у вас есть просьбы, то можете написать их в комментарии)
The shares total 207%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
Дан треугольник со сторонами равными a<=b<=c, из длин высот которого нельзя составить треугольник. Докажите, что у многочлена ax^2+2bx+c=0 есть корень
🙏9🍌4custom 53887417794764598044
Signed Юсуф Нагуманов
Дан многочлен P с целыми неотрицательными коэффициентами. Его степень и коэффициенты неизвестны. Можно за одно действие для заданного тобой целого n узнать значение P(n). Найдите наименьшее k такое, что за k действий можно однозначно восстановить P
custom 53887417794764598049🔥1
Signed Станислав Кузнецов
Почему вы ставите розы?!!?!? Вы думаете та задача - кринж??? Я покажу вам кринж😡😡😡 Дан пятимерный куб 2*2*2*2*2. Какое минимальное число фигурок 2*2*1*1*1 можно из него вырезать чтоб больше нельзя было вырезать ни одну?
custom 53887417794764598049❤7
Signed Мемы для бг
Наипрекраснейшая геома🕺🕺🕺 Пусть у 🥵Пети🥵 есть 2 инструмента: Округлятор2000 - умеет проводить окружность через 3 точки общего положения, и касательнатор3000 - проводит касательную от точки на окружности к этой окружности. Так же 🥵Петя🥵 умеет отмечать случайные точки на плоскости и на уже проведённых кривых, а так же отмечать их пересечения. Сможет ли 🥵Петя🥵 провести отрезок АВ для данных точек А,В?
custom 538874177947645980419❤🔥5
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
Недавно начался Сферып, и это повод вспомнить что канал по геоме: вот картинка, дальше сами разберётесь. Напоминание: дан треугольник, и оранжевая точка Р. Каждая вершина отражается от точки Р, а затем отражение снова отражается от противоположной стороны треугольника для изначальной вершины. Стороны полученного синего треугольника пересекаем с изначальным как на рисунке. Сколько точек пересечения будет у 3 окружнос…
💅6
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
Несложная (если знать определения которые может загуглить любой) Авторская: Найдите все эрмитовы матрицы А для которых существует n так что I - iAⁿ - унитарная (размер I равен размеру А)
custom 53887417794764598047
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
Все мы знаем что появился шорт-лист межнара, по этому... А нет обманул. Его вы и так может посмотреть, а пока вот вам тч: Существует ли натуральные n, у которого ровно 2000 простых делителей, и при этом 2ⁿ+1 ⋮ n
🍾6
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
Пусть f:N->N мультипликативна (то есть f(nm) = f(n)f(m) для всех взаимно простых n,m) Докажите что существует натуральное n такое что f(n) + n + 1 - составное
🔥12
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
Мудрец придумал 10000 попарно различных положительных целыx чисел1 a1, a2, . . . , a10000, а потом сказал: “Для n > 10000 возьми an наименьшим положительным целым, еще невстречавшимся, да так что |a_n − a_n−1| некоторое положительное целое число в 2025 степени. Так ты получишь все натуральные числа.” Для любых ли a1, a2, . . . , a10000 прав мудрец?
custom 57850046577303915896❤4
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
Ещё один шедевр с данной олимпиады: Докажите что существует натуральное N, так что выполняеться следующее равенство: P.s конечно же все косинусы указаны в градусах
custom 538874177947645980412
Signed Тимофей Игнатьев
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @trudyagatopgeom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В связи с явной неактивностью обсуждений в канале я хотел бы узнать что не так: (конечно если у вас есть просьбы, то можете написать их в комментарии)
The shares total 207%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💪Качаем гео💪” (@trudyagatopgeom), 215 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trudyagatopgeom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.