Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝒛𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂🪶

@trtr_zhnn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002455789608
TypeChannel
Username@trtr_zhnn
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/trtr_zhnn

Growth

848584.57 August 2026 — 84 subscribers9 August 2026 — 84 subscribers15 August 2026 — 85 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:4585+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:1884no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:5784first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3627.1%
🍓1914.3%
🕊139.77%
💯118.27%
custom 5229215484238397309107.52%
custom 5267159639102864208107.52%
💅107.52%
💋107.52%
💘96.77%
custom 529216750279565584553.76%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC148 views35 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

✨sweet seventeen🪽 #6767676767

🕊13💅10💘9💋2🍓1

28 Jun 2026, 18:33 UTC215 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @birthdaycountbot

До вашего дня рождения осталось 6 дней

custom 52921675027956558455🍓4

11 Jun 2026, 15:15 UTC289 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎞😍вы не представляете какие красивые закаты в Башкирии

10🍓9💋6custom 52292154842383973093custom 52671596391028642082

11 Jun 2026, 15:15 UTC197 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52671596391028642082

28 May 2026, 14:52 UTC298 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟⭐️🌟🌟🌟 а я ваще то последние 3 дня препала во взлёте✔ спасибо за такую возможность, очень классно было реализовать формат сдачи задач, что не получалось у меня самостоятельно в рамках кружка, но в следующем году надеюсь получится привлечь еще больше людей в астрономию а теперь на заслуженный отдых🥳

16💯11custom 52292154842383973096🍓3💋1

23 May 2026, 17:38 UTC270 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 ещё с 1 апреля фоткаю цветочки, начиная с подснежников

10custom 52671596391028642086🍓2💋1custom 52292154842383973091

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @trtr_zhnn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒛𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂🪶” (@trtr_zhnn), 85 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trtr_zhnn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.