Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for T.R.M.'s Flexes

Channel

T.R.M.'s Flexes

@trrflex

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,357subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001497157506
TypeChannel
Username@trrflex
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/trrflex

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3571,3651,3617 August 2026 — 1,357 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,357 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,358 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,359 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,361 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,360 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,362 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,365 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,362 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,365 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,359 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,357 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,356–1,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 19:371,357-2
11 Sept 2026, 01:391,359-6
6 Sept 2026, 03:591,365+3
2 Sept 2026, 04:341,362-3
27 Aug 2026, 18:531,365+3
24 Aug 2026, 10:541,362+2
21 Aug 2026, 01:341,360-1
13 Aug 2026, 23:551,361+2
10 Aug 2026, 15:021,359+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:161,358+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:201,357no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:311,357first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤624.0%
👍416.0%
😁416.0%
🤡416.0%
🔥312.0%
🤣28.00%
🤬28.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC180 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @blub_meaowPhoto

Telegram Banned from the Apple AppStore

Signed Leonardo

4 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC184 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

TELEGRAM GOT REMOVED FROM THE APP STORE. I REPEAT. TELEGRAM GOT REMOVED FROM THE APP STORE.

🤡4🤣2

Signed Leonardo

31 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC239 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheScapeOfficial

Features in this app/project: • Markdown text support • To-do list scheduler with alarm clock • SHA256 Encryption with Local Backup • Versatile editing modes • Rich image support • Developer mode for debugging • Trash bin support Download: https://github.com/isaiahscape/bedrock/releases/latest Screenshots: https://play.isaiahthings.me/bedrock

❤1

Signed Leonardo

30 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC281 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheScapeOfficialVideo

oh right, some sneak peeks in bedrock

🔥1

Signed Leonardo

30 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC258 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheScapeOfficial

upcoming applications that i'll make later on (it's definitely useful) bedrock: a minimalist monochrome notes editor focused on writing stuff, similar to obsidian's functionality anchor: budget tracker, ad-free with essentials

Signed Leonardo

29 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC242 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheScapeOfficial

Some changes and fixes I made in v1.0.2: • Fix dual-pane layout, implement folder previews, and capitalize APK labels • Implement focus-based navigation and drag-and-drop in dual-pane • Redesign file details dialog to MiXplorer's style • Fix rename button functionality in file list Download link: https://github.com/isaiahscape/materialexp/releases

🔥2

Signed Leonardo

28 Jul 2026, 05:08 UTC253 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheScapeOfficialFile

https://github.com/isaiahscape/materialexp/releases/tag/1.0.1

Signed Leonardo

18 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC521 viewsread 7 August 2026

Side note: If y'all have any DACs, consider testing it with Flick. Some DACs are still unplayable with bit-perfect + passthrough, we might need your help. Discord link is here for you to say anything.

Signed Leonardo

18 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC516 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheScapeOfficialPhoto

Ladies and gents, lemme present the Moss Laboratories! Moss Laboratories is an open-source software collective focused on building high-performance, privacy-first applications. We believe great software should be fast, transparent, and free from ads, tracking, and unnecessary subscriptions. Our flagship projects include: Flick: An audiophile-grade Android music player powered by a custom Rust audio engine. Latch:…

❤1

Signed Leonardo

1 Jul 2026, 04:52 UTC706 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

it can be like tech news, operating system vulnerabilities, exposed datas from various companies, malware (from vxunderground), or maybe recommendations

😁4🤬2

Signed Leonardo

1 Jul 2026, 04:48 UTC694 viewsread 7 August 2026

tho, i cannot guarantee that this channel will be more on android

Signed Leonardo

1 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC754 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

are y'all down with it?

  1. Yes67%
  2. No38%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Leonardo

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trrflex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

are y'all down with it?

  1. Yes67%
  2. No38%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Redmi Note 10 Pro | Updates
@RedmiNote10ProChannel · 22,868
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 September 2026
LMC RELEASE
@gcamlm · 71,845
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
IGNOU Solved Assignments
@solved_ignou_assignment · 65,711
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“T.R.M.'s Flexes” (@trrflex), 1,357 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trrflex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.