Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tural Həmid

@trlhemid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

674subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001809043064
TypeChannel
Username@trlhemid
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/trlhemid

Growth

6748 Aug 2026, 15:01 — 674 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 08:07 — 674 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:019 Aug 2026, 08:07
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 673–675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 08:07674no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:01674first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 674 subscribers
Avg views / post
140
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total140
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

344 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7622.1%
5816.9%
😁5114.8%
4613.4%
🤯4312.5%
🤣277.85%
😡154.36%
🤔72.03%
😐51.45%
🤡51.45%
😢41.16%
🤝41.16%
👎10.291%
😇10.291%
🫡10.291%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trlhemid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC140 views15 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

Üçüncü Qarabağ müharibəsi barədə yazdığım yazım yayımlanıb, Ağdam-Ağdərə istiqamətindəki döyüşlər kimə maraqlıdırsa oxuya bilər

13🤝1🫡1

13 Jul 2026, 20:25 UTC677 views27 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

NYT yazır ki, İsrail illərdir davam edən gizli əməliyyat çərçivəsində keçmiş İran Prezidenti Mahmud Əhmədinecadı kəşfiyyat əməkdaşı kimi yetişdirməyə çalışıb. Məqsəd, fürsət düşəndə onu İranın yeni lideri kimi hakimiyyətə gətirmək idi. Bu əməliyyatın bir hissəsi olaraq 2024-cü ildə Macarıstanın Budapeşt şəhərindəki Ludovika Universitetində “iqlim dəyişikliyi” konfransı təşkil olunub. Universitet rektoru Gergeli Deli

🤯13🤔62👍2😁2😐2

8 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC757 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Donald Tramp: "Yaponiya İslam Respublikası bizim gəmimizə hücum etdi"

🤣21🤡3😁3

29 Jun 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,020 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

1-2 günə kanalda aktiv paylaşımlar davam edəcək.

22👍125

8 Jun 2026, 20:13 UTC≈1,480 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

2026-cı il Ermənistan parlament seçkilərinin ən maraqlı paradokslarından biri ondan ibarət idi ki, seçkinin əsas geosiyasi mövzusu Azərbaycan olsa da, bu mövzu Paşinyanın əleyhinə deyil, onun xeyrinə işlədi. Müxalifətin əsas kampaniya xətti Paşinyanın Azərbaycan qarşısında güzəştə getdiyi tezisi üzərində qurulmuşdu. Robert Koçaryan, Samvel Karapetyan və digər müxalif fiqurlar seçicilərə izah etməyə çalışırdılar ki, P

15👍32

8 Jun 2026, 14:21 UTC906 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Paşinyanın qələbəsi gözlənilən idi. Rəylər uzun müddətdir göstərirdi ki, hakim Vətəndaş Müqaviləsi Partiyası birinci siyasi qüvvə olaraq qalacaq. Lakin seçkinin nəticəsindən daha maraqlı olan məsələ seçkiyə aparan siyasi mühit idi. 2021-ci il seçkiləri ilə müqayisədə Ermənistanın siyasi sistemi formal olaraq rəqabətli qalsa da, siyasi rəqabətin keyfiyyəti nəzərə çarpacaq dərəcədə zəifləmişdi. ATƏT-in Demokratik Təsis

8👍63

7 Jun 2026, 20:48 UTC541 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ermənistan Mərkəzi Seçki Komissiyası 131 seçki məntəqəsi üzrə ilkin nəticələri açıqlayıb. “Vətəndaş Müqaviləsi” partiyası – 56,04% “Güclü Ermənistan” – 21,87% “Ermənistan” bloku – 8,69% “Çiçəklənən Ermənistan” partiyası – 5,09% Nəticələrin ciddi formada dəyişəcəyi inandırıcı deyil. Paşinyanı qələbə münasibətilə təbrik etmək olar. Koçaryana qalan turnikdə çəkinmək olacaq.

👍164🤔1

5 Jun 2026, 21:14 UTC607 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Maraqlıdır ki, İsrailin Ynet saytı hələ aprel ayında yayımladığı xəbərdə Rəhman Moğəddəmi Azərbaycanda İsrailə qarşı terror aktlarını hazırlamaqda (bunun içərisində BTC layihəsini partlatmaq da var) ittiham etmişdi. Naxçıvana hücumdan sonra da Azərbaycan İranı elə İsrail səfirliyinə hücum etməyə cəhddə günahlandırmışdı. Kartları birləşdirəndə Azərbaycanın İsraillə bu məsələdə işbirliyi etməsi qüvvətli ehtimal kimi gö

🤯82

5 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC≈2,750 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Middle East Eye yazır ki, İsrail bölmələri Azərbaycan ərazisindən istifadə edərək martın 4-də SEPAH-ın xüsusi kəşfiyyat əməliyyatları şöbəsinin rəhbəri Rəhman Moğəddəmi öldürüblər. Əməliyyat dronlarla həyata keçirilib. Həmin hadisədən 1 gün sonra İran pilotsuz aparatlarla Naxçıvan Beynəlxalq Hava Limanına və yaxınlıqdakı kəndə zərbələr endirib.

🤯11😡3👍2😐21👎1

5 Jun 2026, 10:40 UTC607 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Gəmidə Azərbaycan vətəndaşlarının öldürüldüyünü bilirlər, yenə də videoya mahnı qoşub hücumu göstərirlər.

😡6😢4👍1

5 Jun 2026, 10:26 UTC548 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

CNN də iddia edir ki, İran-İsrail/ABŞ müharibəsi zamanı Azərbaycan İsrail hərbi bölmələrinin ölkədə yerləşdirilməsinə icazə verib, onlar əsasən kəşfiyyat məlumatı toplayıblar.

🤯7😡2😁1😐1

5 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC493 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Rusiya və İran olsaydı, indi bir şivən diplomatik reaksiya olardı, kim bilir. Ukrayna vurub 5 dənizçimizi öldürüb, elə bil belə də olmalıymış kimi reaksiya verirlər, soyuq və emosiyasız.

10👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trlhemid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 514,993 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tural Həmid” (@trlhemid), 674 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trlhemid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.