Channel
@trista65_dnej
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001260152174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trista65_dnej |
| Description | Максимально коротко о том, что я посмотрела в 2022 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trista65_dnej |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 15 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 15 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
А вот история про реальные события, легшие в основу Very English Scandal, про который писала выше. С фоточкаме (порой по старой привычке не могу удержаться от олбанского) https://diletant.media/articles/45262665/
Sticker, posted without a caption
кадры выстроены идеально, в том числе по цвету
File, posted without a caption
«Очень английский скандал» мини-сериал с постаревшим Хью Грантом и Беном Уишоу. 3 серии Основан на реальной истории: середина 20 века, в Британии гомосексуальные связи еще запрещены законом, а один из видных членов либеральной партии (Грант) заводит роман с юношей, которого зовет Зайкой. У Зайки некоторые проблемы с психикой (как минимум депрессии). Роман кончается быстро, но история тянется еще с десяток лет, обрас…
Sticker, posted without a caption
«Неадекватные люди 2», 2020 Посмотрела сразу же после первого, но не могла собраться написать о нем — слишком много всего и непонятно, с какого боку подобраться. Итак, коротко, согласно формату. Сюжет меняет фокус и концентрируется на истории героини. Никаких душевных метаний героя там нет, одни жалостливые взгляды да смена малолетних женушек. Это история роста женщины — как емко сформулировала @S_Lepisheva, отложе…
Video, posted without a caption
Продолжаю смотреть «Мунч», последний переведенный сезон. Там есть серия "Диворс а-ля рюс", нашпигованная по самое не могу национальными стереотипами, разве что ушанки не хватает (но это, видимо, потому, что во Франции слишком тепло для ушанок). Русские — это большие деньги (при этом «мы не из мафии», но это не точно), мечты уехать на Р о д и н у из этой вашей Европы, умение и желание пить много водки по любому поводу…
В Голливуде существует термин "русская концовка", когда в конце фильма герои либо погибают, либо находятся в отчаянии и беде — русские режиссеры в 1910-х даже снимали ремейки американских фильмов, заменяя голливудский "хэппи-энд" на трагический конец (тема от @glavmedia)
Sticker, posted without a caption
«Неадекватные люди» (2010) Российский фильм, наполовину снятый в интерьерах из "Не родись красивой", но при этом не стыдный. Очень кратко: ✔️ За 12 лет наша жизнь довольно сильно изменилась, то, что было модно или привычно в 2010, заметно олдскулит сейчас (ВК, раскладушки, мусорные ведра, мода на девичьи анкетки). ✔️ Психология, психотерапия и психиатрия слиплись в голове создателя фильма в один большой комок, как …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @trista65_dnej. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@trista65_dnej named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“365 дней одного года” (@trista65_dnej), 15 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trista65_dnej.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.