Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🪖☠OPERADORES ESPECIALES🪖☠

Channel

🪖☠OPERADORES ESPECIALES🪖☠

@trincherasdeguerra

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,124subscribers

-1,041 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001524465916
TypeChannel
Username@trincherasdeguerra
DescriptionLa realidad del conflicto. "Trincheras de Guerra" te trae la información, imágenes y reportes que no verás en otros medios. Contenido directo desde las zonas de combate. Se recomienda discreción.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/trincherasdeguerra

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,12415,21014,66714 August 2026 — 15,165 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,183 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,167 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,157 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,155 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,184 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,201 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,199 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,195 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,197 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,200 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,205 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,210 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,188 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,174 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,151 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,124 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,095 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,063 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,001 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,938 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,910 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,889 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,841 subscribers25 September 2026 — 14,740 subscribers3 October 2026 — 14,614 subscribers8 October 2026 — 14,519 subscribers12 October 2026 — 14,462 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,435 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,423 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,401 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,386 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,372 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,359 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,355 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,341 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,324 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,310 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,296 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,281 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,259 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,246 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,238 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,226 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,215 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,200 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,193 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,187 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,178 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,164 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,146 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,142 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,124 subscribers14 August 20267 November 2026
53 measurements spanning 85 days, net -1,041. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,961–15,373 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 22:0014,124-18
6 Nov 2026, 22:2614,142-4
5 Nov 2026, 23:5914,146-18
5 Nov 2026, 02:4814,164-14
4 Nov 2026, 03:3814,178-9
3 Nov 2026, 04:4714,187-6
2 Nov 2026, 03:3514,193-7
1 Nov 2026, 01:1914,200-15
30 Oct 2026, 23:3614,215-11
29 Oct 2026, 23:5914,226-12
28 Oct 2026, 21:4614,238-8
27 Oct 2026, 22:2014,246-13
26 Oct 2026, 22:4814,259-22
25 Oct 2026, 21:5614,281-15
24 Oct 2026, 19:1614,296-14
23 Oct 2026, 22:1614,310-14
22 Oct 2026, 18:5114,324-17
21 Oct 2026, 14:4114,341-14
20 Oct 2026, 09:3614,355-4
19 Oct 2026, 07:1614,359first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 14,124 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,600
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.581%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held36 (30 June 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total15,610
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,550
Videos
≈3,560
Links
≈313

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26m 17s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

553 reactions across 32 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15027.1%
👍13925.1%
🕊447.96%
🤬274.88%
🔥264.70%
🫡244.34%
👎234.16%
🤪213.80%
😱142.53%
🤯142.53%
👏132.35%
😢111.99%
👀81.45%
😡81.45%
😴50.904%
🍌30.542%
👻30.542%
🥰30.542%
🦄30.542%
🍓20.362%
10 further kinds122.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 553 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,320 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

El nuevo negocio del ejército, entre cuantos pendejos habran idealizado esta mamada? Por que la negatividad? Por que todo sale del sueldo del personal

🤬4❤1

Signed WAGNER 😈🪖💀

25 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,700 views19 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Las emboscadas perpetradas por organizaciones criminales contra elementos de seguridad (Ejército Mexicano, Guardia Nacional, Marina, Policía Estatal y corporaciones municipales) constituyen un problema táctico y operativo crítico en el combate contra la delincuencia organizada.

🫡10🤯4👍3❤2

Signed WAGNER 😈🪖💀

24 Oct 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,490 viewsread 8 November 2026

Tratare de subir lo mas relevante chicos lo prometo

Signed WAGNER 😈🪖💀

24 Oct 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,450 viewsread 8 November 2026

Ahora tenemos un negocio, y ya no me da tiempo de publicar lo siento mucho de verdad

Signed WAGNER 😈🪖💀

23 Oct 2026, 19:23 UTC≈2,600 views12 reactionsread 8 November 2026

El dueño ya se desertó díganle que me pase el canal camaradas jaja

🫡6👍5😎1

Signed ALERTA MEXICO

13 Oct 2026, 18:41 UTC≈4,050 views26 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Como andan camaradas

👍21❤4🤷‍♂1

Signed ALERTA MEXICO

5 Oct 2026, 00:01 UTC≈5,550 views40 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤪18😡8👎5🦄3❤2👏2👍1🤩1

Signed WAGNER 😈🪖💀

24 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈6,720 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Una pal glorioso ejército mexicano

❤5👏1

Signed ALERTA MEXICO

24 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈6,350 views13 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍9👎3😈1

Signed ALERTA MEXICO

20 Sept 2026, 04:42 UTC≈7,170 views12 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

MICHOACÁN ESTA TARDE DEL SÁBADO 19 DE SEPTIEMBRE EN LA LOCALIDAD DE LA COLONIA EL BOSQUE UN CIUDADANO AL PRESENCIAR QUE UNOS POLICÍAS MUNICIPALES QUERÍA A EXTORCIONAR Y PEDIRLE DINERO A UNA MUJER DE 15 AÑOS Y SU NOVIO DE 16 COMENZÓ LA GRABACIÓN PARA PONER EN ALERTA A TODA LA LOCALIDAD DE EL CARTEL DE LOS AZULES Según la información verídica el joven contaba con los documentos de su motocicleta en regla y estos elem…

❤7😴5

Signed ALERTA MEXICO

19 Sept 2026, 21:21 UTC≈5,210 views34 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🚨ÚLTIMA HORA: El presidente Trump acaba de firmar una orden ejecutiva designando a los cárteles de droga como organizaciones terroristas extranjeras Ahora pueden ser atacados con FUERZA LETAL por el ejército de EE.UU. ¿Qué vas a decir mañana @Claudiashein, vas a cantar el himno nacional?

👍17❤10🤪3🍌2🎃1💅1

Signed WAGNER 😈🪖💀

15 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈5,820 views23 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍13❤8👎2

Signed WAGNER 😈🪖💀

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @trincherasdeguerra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Blog del Narco Mexico
@canalblogdelnarco · 109,568
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🪖☠OPERADORES ESPECIALES🪖☠” (@trincherasdeguerra), 14,124 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trincherasdeguerra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.