Open Discussion: Start connecting with others now @TrailsChat
👍10🖕2

Channel
@trails
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001510338807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trails |
| Created | 10 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trails |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 25 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 26 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 84.6% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 15.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2023 to 20 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Open Discussion: Start connecting with others now @TrailsChat
👍10🖕2
Hello guys! Going to create a bot for @Trails for members to introduce themselves and upload portfolios, etc.
COME JOIN NOW!
👍1
@TrailsChat
Trails pinned «@Trails GATEWAY -All Discussions/Chats will be linked through here only»
Discussion is now avalible users of this channel can leave comments if they are interested in doing so.
Welcome to @Trails! Connect with like-minded Creatives, Developers, Designers and many others now. Start by joining the chats above. More group discussions coming soon!
JOIN NOW!
Establishing networks for creative discussions. All are welcome! Designers/Developers/Creatives
More coming soon!
@TechFirms @DesignerDashboard @STEMCut (COMING SOON)
Tech / Dev Discussions!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @trails. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@trails named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trails” (@trails), 25 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trails.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.