Today: AMA session with TradingView
❤512👍149🔥53🦄49⚡39💯35👏27🏆26

Channel
@tradingview
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142,880subscribers
-320 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001143474883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradingview |
| Created | 13 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradingview |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 142,880 | -68 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 142,948 | -57 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 143,005 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 143,004 | -63 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 143,067 | -49 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 143,116 | -46 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 143,162 | -38 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 143,200 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 143,200 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
12,983 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,508 | 34.7% | |
| 👍 | 4,151 | 32.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1,251 | 9.64% | |
| 🍾 | 367 | 2.83% | |
| 🤯 | 307 | 2.36% | |
| 👏 | 266 | 2.05% | |
| 🏆 | 239 | 1.84% | |
| 👀 | 193 | 1.49% | |
| 👌 | 193 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 182 | 1.40% | |
| 🆒 | 153 | 1.18% | |
| 🐳 | 143 | 1.10% | |
| 🌚 | 135 | 1.04% | |
| ⚡ | 133 | 1.02% | |
| 💯 | 114 | 0.878% | |
| 😎 | 111 | 0.855% | |
| 🦄 | 91 | 0.701% | |
| 🤝 | 82 | 0.632% | |
| 🎃 | 64 | 0.493% | |
| 😇 | 61 | 0.47% | |
| 7 further kinds | 239 | 1.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,983reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2023 to 10 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Today: AMA session with TradingView
❤512👍149🔥53🦄49⚡39💯35👏27🏆26
Get ready: TradingView AMA is on the way!
❤94🔥90👍25💋16🌚13🥰8👏5🤩4
TradingView pinned «Hey, Telegram traders! Exciting news out there as we have officially landed as a mini-app in @tapps_bot! Now, you can track market trends, dive into charting analysis, and access technical indicators without leaving your group chats. Get it here»
Photo, posted without a caption
❤504👍140👌48🏆42🔥31💋27🆒27🌚19
Hey, Telegram traders! Exciting news out there as we have officially landed as a mini-app in @tapps_bot! Now, you can track market trends, dive into charting analysis, and access technical indicators without leaving your group chats. Get it here
❤251👍72🤯25🔥23🤓22👏14⚡13🏆12
TradingView pinned Deleted message
Mark your calendars, Traders. It's coming: tradingview.com/black-friday/
❤725👍276🔥152🍾91💯45😁38👏36🆒36
It's that time of the year... Please meet our newest additions to the Pine Script® Hall of Fame: 1. KioseffTrading 2. LuxAlgo Want to see their scripts? Click their username above to head directly to their TradingView page. These coders are now certified Wizards, known globally for the open source indicators and strategies that they code from scratch, for all to enjoy. 🧙♂️🧙♂️ Read this: https://www.tradingview…
👍1,080❤402🔥118👏98😎85🆒57⚡51🌚50
Microsoft is currently the largest company on the planet, recently outpacing Apple to take the to spot with a market cap nearing $3 trillion: 1. Microsoft 👑 2. Apple 3. Saudi Arabian Oil 4. Alphabet (Google) 5. Amazon 6. NVIDIA 7. Meta (Facebook) 8. Berkshire Hathaway (Warren Buffet) 9. Tesla 10. Eli Lilly 11. Visa Track this data in our new Stock Screener 2.0.
❤601👍363🏆62👀58🔥43🤯43🍾28👌27
Bitcoin ETFs now available on TradingView IBIT - iShares Bitcoin BITB - Bitwise Bitcoin DEFI - Tidal Bitcoin ARKB - ARK Bitcoin GBTC - Grayscale Bitcoin FBTC - Fidelity Bitcoin BTCW - WisdomTree Bitcoin BTCO - Invesco Bitcoin BRRR - Valkyrie Bitcoin HODL - VanEck Bitcoin EZBC - Franklin Bitcoin Tip: use our search box to filter, find, and sort all Bitcoin funds, just like the attached screenshot.
🔥366👍265🦄42🎉36👀27🍾22🏆21🐳20
The 15 largest cryptocurrencies by market cap. Some observations: • Bitcoin is once again nearing $1 trillion market cap. • Ethereum has fallen behind Bitcoin by its widest margin in multiple months. • Stablecoins like Tether and USD Coin remain in the top 10. What do you see? These rankings were created with our new Coins screener.
👍291❤102🔥72🍾20🏆15👏12😇12👀11
Our Pine Editor now tracks unsaved changes, giving quants and coders more tools to create high quality scripts for markets: • Green bar identifies new lines • Dotted blue bar marks changes to existing lines • Red triangle indicates deletions Make 2024 the year you learn how to code your own indicator. Check out these new features for Pine: https://www.tradingview.com/blog/en/track-unsaved-changes-in-the-pine-edito…
❤165👍84🔥29🥰15👏10💯7🤓6🤯6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tradingview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 45,891 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TradingView” (@tradingview), 142,880 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradingview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.