Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 87 days, net +6,862. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,909–19,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 22:06
18,800
+25
2 Nov 2026, 01:01
18,775
+57
31 Oct 2026, 21:29
18,718
+46
30 Oct 2026, 18:56
18,672
+16
29 Oct 2026, 19:28
18,656
+25
28 Oct 2026, 21:21
18,631
+40
27 Oct 2026, 20:16
18,591
+3
26 Oct 2026, 16:30
18,588
+36
25 Oct 2026, 18:17
18,552
+41
24 Oct 2026, 21:30
18,511
+37
23 Oct 2026, 21:49
18,474
+50
22 Oct 2026, 18:37
18,424
+64
21 Oct 2026, 17:35
18,360
+105
20 Oct 2026, 11:08
18,255
+113
19 Oct 2026, 11:20
18,142
+31
18 Oct 2026, 14:09
18,111
+29
17 Oct 2026, 15:38
18,082
+36
16 Oct 2026, 16:06
18,046
+23
15 Oct 2026, 17:45
18,023
+33
14 Oct 2026, 21:01
17,990
first reading
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 18,800 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,880
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
73 (27 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
77,570
Reactions total
856
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 03:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
270
Videos
6
Links
66
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,810 reactions across 73 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,120
55.6%
🔥
836
21.9%
👍
508
13.3%
🎉
107
2.81%
🤯
74
1.94%
👏
56
1.47%
🤩
38
0.997%
😁
23
0.604%
😱
20
0.525%
🥰
16
0.42%
⚡
6
0.157%
🗿
6
0.157%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,810 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 73 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradinglabgroup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📊 Spotify Stock Analysis
After our last analysis, I'm seeing another good trade idea here.
We've broken out of a long standing weekly range with a Break of Structure.
I expect higher prices in the coming days, potentially reaching $650.
Though we're heading into the midterms, which could affect price action.
Bleeding continues 🩸
I told you GOLD was looking ugly on the daily time frame after losing VAL.
GOLD is now down almost 3.5% since my last post.
The structure remains bearish, and things are NOT looking good.
As long as we trade below VAL, I remain bearish. Stay cautious.
🔥 +45% GAINS ON MRNA INSIDE MY DISCORD
My Discord is where you get exact entries & exits for my trades.
Alongside me, a team of 8 experts shares trades even when I'm inactive.
You also get direct access to me to ask questions and learn my strategy.
👉 I'll see you inside: https://tradinglab.ai
🥇 GOLD is looking UGLY.
I am posting less and less about GOLD is because chart looks really bad.
We're in a big downtrend, and the last attempt to reverse it failed.
Plus, we just lost the important Value Area Low and confirmed a bearish retest.
Unless some miracle happens, GOLD is heading lower.
✔️ $SP500 Successful Analysis
Let's gooo!!! Trade Idea #2 played out exactly as I marked.
We caught a crazy 0.48% scalp move from my marked zone.
Keep in mind, this was on a lower time frame, which is why the move was small.
However, if you managed your risk properly, you could have made good cash.
Bitcoin Analysis
15m TF
I'm simply sharing zones here. Executing trades is up to you.
For shorts, I'm watching the Inverse FVG zone I marked.
For longs, I don't see a clear zone unless we flip that FVG.
You know everything you need to take a good trade.
✔️ INTC Successful Analysis
I gave you a box, and Intel stock is now bouncing from that exact box.
I don't know how I can make it any simpler than that.
We're up +12% on this.
If we revisit the box again, I might look for longs again.
I'm very bullish on this stock.
📊 $SP500 Analysis
Two major trade ideas:
1) We flip the FVG into support, giving us a long opportunity toward $7,770.
2) We reject from the FVG, enter a short and ride it down to the bounce zone.
From that bounce zone, we look for longs.
Pretty simple and straightforward ideas. Just wait for confirmation before executing.
Here's a statistic for you.
Mid terms are about to start in a week.
Since 1942 we averaged a 16.6% gain during midterms.
Not only that...but from 1942 till now we have not had a single negative midterm. NOT ONE SINCE 1942.
Something to keep in mind
🔥 $SNOW Analysis Update
Easy +5% on this stock. This is what years of experience look like. Consistent wins.
I'm not saying I don't lose. I do. I simply win more than I lose.
That's what makes me profitable. In just one day, you can see the results of my analysis.
I don't need to say more. Send it higher.
✔️ ZEC Successful Analysis
Mamma Mia! Another analysis played out exactly as I said.
We did the retest of the upper boundary of the channel and the FVG.
And BOOM. +10.86% move 🟢
The structure remains bullish, so I'm still in this trade and looking for higher prices.
📊 $SBUX Analysis
The last long area got front run, and the price bounced +18% from that zone. I'm sad.
It's fine, time to bounce back 😉
I'm expecting a rejection from this green box I marked.
Fibonacci levels, FVG's all there, and the structure is also bearish, so I'm looking for shorts here.
Alerts are placed. We should see the results soon.
👍13🤯4🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @tradinglabgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @tradinglabgroup as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
17 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TradingLab” (@tradinglabgroup), 18,800 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradinglabgroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.