Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TradingLab

Channel

TradingLab

@tradinglabgroup

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Cite this entry

18,800subscribers

+6,862 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003621359208
TypeChannel
Username@tradinglabgroup
DescriptionTeaching you how to become a better trader. Learn to Trade like me and join the best community: https: https://tradinglab.ai/?source=telegram
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tradinglabgroup

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,93818,80015,3697 August 2026 — 11,938 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,023 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,144 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,199 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,278 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,335 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,471 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,612 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,767 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,860 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,966 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,077 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,156 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,332 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,672 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,128 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,487 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,664 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,802 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,000 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,176 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,311 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,394 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,493 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,607 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,887 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,121 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,259 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,435 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,497 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,602 subscribers27 September 2026 — 17,136 subscribers4 October 2026 — 17,360 subscribers9 October 2026 — 17,697 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,920 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,990 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,023 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,046 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,082 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,111 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,142 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,255 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,360 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,424 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,474 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,511 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,552 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,588 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,591 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,631 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,656 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,672 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,718 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,775 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,800 subscribers7 August 20262 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 87 days, net +6,862. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,909–19,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 22:0618,800+25
2 Nov 2026, 01:0118,775+57
31 Oct 2026, 21:2918,718+46
30 Oct 2026, 18:5618,672+16
29 Oct 2026, 19:2818,656+25
28 Oct 2026, 21:2118,631+40
27 Oct 2026, 20:1618,591+3
26 Oct 2026, 16:3018,588+36
25 Oct 2026, 18:1718,552+41
24 Oct 2026, 21:3018,511+37
23 Oct 2026, 21:4918,474+50
22 Oct 2026, 18:3718,424+64
21 Oct 2026, 17:3518,360+105
20 Oct 2026, 11:0818,255+113
19 Oct 2026, 11:2018,142+31
18 Oct 2026, 14:0918,111+29
17 Oct 2026, 15:3818,082+36
16 Oct 2026, 16:0618,046+23
15 Oct 2026, 17:4518,023+33
14 Oct 2026, 21:0117,990first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 18,800 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,880
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held73 (27 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total77,570
Reactions total856
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 03:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
270
Videos
6
Links
66

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,810 reactions across 73 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,12055.6%
🔥83621.9%
👍50813.3%
🎉1072.81%
🤯741.94%
👏561.47%
🤩380.997%
😁230.604%
😱200.525%
🥰160.42%
⚡60.157%
🗿60.157%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,810 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 73 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradinglabgroup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,070 views13 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

📊 Spotify Stock Analysis After our last analysis, I'm seeing another good trade idea here. We've broken out of a long standing weekly range with a Break of Structure. I expect higher prices in the coming days, potentially reaching $650. Though we're heading into the midterms, which could affect price action.

👍8🤯5

2 Nov 2026, 18:40 UTC≈1,390 views46 reactions1 Starread 3 November 2026
Photo

Bleeding continues 🩸 I told you GOLD was looking ugly on the daily time frame after losing VAL. GOLD is now down almost 3.5% since my last post. The structure remains bearish, and things are NOT looking good. As long as we trade below VAL, I remain bearish. Stay cautious.

👍28❤12🔥6

30 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC≈3,110 views24 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

🔥 +45% GAINS ON MRNA INSIDE MY DISCORD My Discord is where you get exact entries & exits for my trades. Alongside me, a team of 8 experts shares trades even when I'm inactive. You also get direct access to me to ask questions and learn my strategy. 👉 I'll see you inside: https://tradinglab.ai

🔥10❤7👍5🤯2

29 Oct 2026, 18:51 UTC≈3,980 views81 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

🥇 GOLD is looking UGLY. I am posting less and less about GOLD is because chart looks really bad. We're in a big downtrend, and the last attempt to reverse it failed. Plus, we just lost the important Value Area Low and confirmed a bearish retest. Unless some miracle happens, GOLD is heading lower.

❤50🤯16👍8🗿6🔥1

29 Oct 2026, 17:47 UTC≈3,760 views11 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

✔️ $SP500 Successful Analysis Let's gooo!!! Trade Idea #2 played out exactly as I marked. We caught a crazy 0.48% scalp move from my marked zone. Keep in mind, this was on a lower time frame, which is why the move was small. However, if you managed your risk properly, you could have made good cash.

🔥7🤯2❤1🥰1

28 Oct 2026, 19:56 UTC≈3,750 views40 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Analysis 15m TF I'm simply sharing zones here. Executing trades is up to you. For shorts, I'm watching the Inverse FVG zone I marked. For longs, I don't see a clear zone unless we flip that FVG. You know everything you need to take a good trade.

👍20❤16🔥4

28 Oct 2026, 18:49 UTC≈3,440 views19 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

✔️ INTC Successful Analysis I gave you a box, and Intel stock is now bouncing from that exact box. I don't know how I can make it any simpler than that. We're up +12% on this. If we revisit the box again, I might look for longs again. I'm very bullish on this stock.

🔥13❤5👍1

28 Oct 2026, 17:35 UTC≈3,190 views26 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

📊 $SP500 Analysis Two major trade ideas: 1) We flip the FVG into support, giving us a long opportunity toward $7,770. 2) We reject from the FVG, enter a short and ride it down to the bounce zone. From that bounce zone, we look for longs. Pretty simple and straightforward ideas. Just wait for confirmation before executing.

❤19🔥4👍3

27 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈3,590 views57 reactions1 Starread 3 November 2026
Photo

Here's a statistic for you. Mid terms are about to start in a week. Since 1942 we averaged a 16.6% gain during midterms. Not only that...but from 1942 till now we have not had a single negative midterm. NOT ONE SINCE 1942. Something to keep in mind

❤40🔥11👍6

26 Oct 2026, 19:12 UTC≈3,710 views30 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

🔥 $SNOW Analysis Update Easy +5% on this stock. This is what years of experience look like. Consistent wins. I'm not saying I don't lose. I do. I simply win more than I lose. That's what makes me profitable. In just one day, you can see the results of my analysis. I don't need to say more. Send it higher.

🔥18🤩5⚡3❤3👍1

26 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC≈3,490 views41 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

✔️ ZEC Successful Analysis Mamma Mia! Another analysis played out exactly as I said. We did the retest of the upper boundary of the channel and the FVG. And BOOM. +10.86% move 🟢 The structure remains bullish, so I'm still in this trade and looking for higher prices.

🔥25❤12👍2🤩2

26 Oct 2026, 16:32 UTC≈3,550 views20 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

📊 $SBUX Analysis The last long area got front run, and the price bounced +18% from that zone. I'm sad. It's fine, time to bounce back 😉 I'm expecting a rejection from this green box I marked. Fibonacci levels, FVG's all there, and the structure is also bearish, so I'm looking for shorts here. Alerts are placed. We should see the results soon.

👍13🤯4🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @tradinglabgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @tradinglabgroup as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
17 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TradingLab” (@tradinglabgroup), 18,800 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradinglabgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.