9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,937–11,178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 09:25
11,082
-10
13 Aug 2026, 00:26
11,092
-18
12 Aug 2026, 03:32
11,110
-18
11 Aug 2026, 02:11
11,128
-22
10 Aug 2026, 04:48
11,150
+185
9 Aug 2026, 05:03
10,965
-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:31
10,968
-9
7 Aug 2026, 01:25
10,977
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:02
10,977
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.0%
avg views ÷ 11,082 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,550
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
21 (12 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
40,859
Reactions total
1,050
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,267 reactions across 21 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,887
83.2%
👍
132
5.82%
🔥
75
3.31%
❤🔥
38
1.68%
🙏
34
1.50%
👎
14
0.618%
🍾
12
0.529%
👌
12
0.529%
💔
12
0.529%
👏
11
0.485%
🫡
9
0.397%
💩
6
0.265%
😍
6
0.265%
👀
5
0.221%
🤩
4
0.176%
🗿
3
0.132%
💯
2
0.088%
😇
2
0.088%
🦄
2
0.088%
🖕
1
0.044%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,267reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradinggalaxy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
.
.
داستان ژورنال های RTM
.
.
یکی از بدترین تله هایی که حین یادگیری RTM ممکنه دچارش بشید مطالعهی ژورنال های پابلیک شدهی آکادمی هست !!
اکثر دوستان این نکته رو فراموش می کنند که این ژورنال ها اغلبشون توسط افرادی نوشته و پاسخ داده شده اند که مبتدی و در حال یادگیری اند یا دیدگاهشون با مال ایف کمی متفاوته
خب پس چیکار کنیم ؟
ویدیوهای خود #ایف رو ببینید ، توی فارکس فکتوری از گذشتهی ایف تا الانش تک تک معاملاتشو نگاه کنید …
.
.
اگر به شماتیک های بالا علاقه دارید این فایل زیپ رو دانلود کنید ، توش پر از شماتیک هایی هست که بنده ی حقیر از ولگردی در اینستاگرام و جاهای مختلف بدست آورده و ذخیره کردم . موضوع شماتیک مثل بازار بمبئی میمونه و از ارتی ام تا تکنیکال کلاسیک و هرچیزی داخلشه
.
.
لینک دانلود
.
.
پی نوشت : فایل در سرور داخلی ذخیره شده و بدون فیلترشکن با خیال راحت میتونید دانلود کنید .
و من الله التوفیق ، ملا رینزایی 🌹
.
.
🆔 @TradingGala
واقعیت این است که برخی از ما فرصت داشتن یک پدر و مادر خوب نداشته ایم ، بدبختی و حقارت را در وجودمان نهادینه کرده اند و هنوز هم فکر میکنیم هرچه بیشتر بدبخت تر شویم ممکن است دوستمان داشته باشند یا حداقل با بدبخت کردن خودمان به آنها آسیب خواهیم زد ، هرکجا که به شکست و انتقام از خودمان ختم می شود دقیقا همانجا را برای پیمودن طی میکنیم و مدام در جنگ و جدل با خودیم و دشمنی جز خود نداریم برای همین ترید را تا وقتی میخواهیم به…
فلیپ یا سورس اف اینگولف ؟
.
.
شما میتونید هفته ها ژورنال های rtm رو بخونید و حسابی خودتونو اذیت کنید و بالاخره بعد هفته ها بک تست و آزمون خطا source of engulf رو یاد بگیرید( که البته معلوم نیست این اصطلاح کلا به گوش شما بخوره یا بتونید یاد بگیرید یا نه) یا به حرف شیخ رینزایی گوش بدید و برید Flip رو توی اسمارت مانی یاد بگیرید چون شکل خیلی ساده تر و کاربردی تر همونه بدون اینکه اف ال پیدا کنید و دنبال سورس اینگولفش بگرد…
از اونجایی که قرار شده مطالب متفرقه بدردبخور هم بزارم شما رو با وبسایت :
https://git.ir/
آشنا میکنم ، یک شاهکار تمام عیار که از عکاسی تا آشپزی و برنامه نویسی و طراحی و هرچیزی که به ذهنتون برسه براش آموزش و کورس های خارجی با زیرنویس فارسی داره و بنده به شخصه ازش بسیار استفاده میکنم و مطمئنم برای شما هم مفید خواهد بود ( یکی از خوبی های کورس های خارجی کوتاه بودن اونهاست برخلاف ما ایرانی ها که تا جای ممکن مطالب رو کش می…
انواع FTR در RTM
بعد از کلی زیر و رو کردن مدرس های مختلف RTM این انواع FTR هست که بهش رسیدیم ، یکی دوتای دیگه ام هستند من جمله اینکه در اول روند اولین کف یا سقف رو هم بعضی ها FTR در نظر میگیرند .
و من الله التوفیق شیخ رینزایی 🌹
🆔 @TradingGalaxy
تصمیم گرفتم براتون سرور بخرم ، چرا ؟
- اولا سرعت نت پایینه دو روز طول میکشه یه دوره رو بتونیم آپلود کنیم و دو روز هم برای شما طول میکشه بتونید دوره رو دانلود کنید
- دوما ، نت گرون شده و روش تعرفه بستن و هم کسی که آپلود میکنه هم کسی که دانلود میکنه باید کلی هزینه اینترنت بده
و من الله التوفیق ، شیخ رینزایی 🌹
🆔 @TradingGalaxy
پی نوشت : قدرت موشکی منطقه نت رو درست کن
.
.
لیستی از تحلیل های redSword11 بزرگ !!
فقط لطفا نگاه کنید cp ها رو چطوری گرفته یا چه نگاه ساده ای به الگوی الماس داشته و سپس تمام این سادگی و زیبایی رو با ارتی ام بعد از ایشون مقایسه کنید
شیخ رینزایی 🌹
🆔 @TradingGalaxy
پی نوشت : ترجیح میدهم بجای سر و کله زدن با الگوی الماس در تایم فریم پایین و دیوانه شدن دقیقا به همین شیوه صبر کنم الگو کامل بشه و فسقلیشو توی تایم بالاتر ببینم
.
.
حتما دیدید یه جاهایی قیمت مرتب شدو میزنه و ریجکت میشه ؟ تعداد ریجکت اگر از یه حدی بالاتر باشه نشانه ی مصرف ناحیه عرضه یا تقاضاست و استاد بزرگ redSword11 در این تصویر به همین اشاره دارند .
رینزایی 🌹
🆔 @TradingGalaxy
#redSword11
دوتا از معامله های ردسورد11 رو باهم نگاه کنیم ، اینکه الگوی پرچم را چطور گرفته و به وجود پل در آن اشاره کرده است ، تمام این معاملات قبل از این هستند که پیچیدگی های بیخود به ارتی ام اضافه شوند .
شیخ رینزایی 🌹
🆔 @TradingGalaxy
.
.
سیمیتری در ارتی ام چیست ؟
.
.
بنظرم چیستی سیمیتری در معنای آن نهفته و با همین می توان فهمید اما برای فهم دقیقتر آن بهتر است به redsword11 مراجعه کنیم بخصوص که پیچیده گویی و یاوه بافی های بعضی از مسترهای ارتی ام را ندارد .
و من الله التوفیق ، شیخ رینزایی 🌹
پی نوشت : آنچه را ردسورد11 گفته با یاوه هایی که بعضی مدرس های وطنی برای سیمیتری میبافند مقایسه کنید تا بفهمید چقدر از ماجرا دورند
🆔 @TradingGalaxy
.
.
چاک در چاک
.
.
با تغییر دادن نقطه ورود از چاک معمولی به به این چاک تودرتو میتونید وین ریت خودتون رو تا حد بسیار زیادی بالا ببرید اما موقعیت معاملاتی براتون کمتر میشه
و من الله التوفیق ، شیخ رینزایی 🌹
پی نوشت : در چاک کوچک که در برگشت به چاک اصلی تشکیل می شود شانه چپ هیچ ایرادی ندارد پیوت کوچک حتی گاها تک کندلی باشد
🆔 @TradingGalaxy
❤31👏3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @tradinggalaxy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
در کنار روانشناسی و تکنیکال مطالب پراکنده مثل معرفی فیلم و کتاب و ... هم بزار42%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 722,340 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دنیای آموزش @G_N_E_S_R_0 · 126,641 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading Galaxy(RINZAYI)” (@tradinggalaxy), 11,082 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradinggalaxy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.