Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
Trade With Phoenix
@tradewithphoenix
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,674subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001803936032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradewithphoenix |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradewithphoenix |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 2,674 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 2,682 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 2,688 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 2,692 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 2,701 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 2,709 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 2,716 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 2,716 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 14 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
If needed mt 1
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
EUR USD 1 mint
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tradewithphoenix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Can we start giveaways guys?
- Yes89%
- No11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2025 to 17 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Funny_Memes_Sarcasm · 41,304
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 29 August 2026
@Cryptobantergroup0 · 87,889
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@daily_jobupdates · 113,343
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
@jobupdates4 · 48,877
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trade With Phoenix” (@tradewithphoenix), 2,674 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradewithphoenix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.