Channel
@tradersroom_reviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002524720090 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradersroom_reviews |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 11 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradersroom_reviews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 108 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 109 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 110 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 11 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
120 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 19.2% | |
| 🎉 | 21 | 17.5% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 15.8% | |
| 🆒 | 16 | 13.3% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 10.0% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 5.83% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2025 to 29 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ Thank you all for the feedback! Your support is my biggest motivation to keep moving forward and help you achieve success! 🚀 If you want to change your reality, join us – together, we'll reach our goals! 💬 Write me «Want to join» to start. 🚀 Contact: @Sargis_pro
👍14🎉4👏1🤔1
🔥 POSTING YOUR FEEDBACK ON TRADING SESSIONS HERE 👑 If you want to test my signals and make money, I’m waiting for you all on my VIP channel! ‼️ And if you're not with us yet - send me a message, and I'll give you instructions on how to join the team. 💬 Write me «Want to join» to start. 🚀 My Contact: @Sargis_pro
🆒8❤3
🔥 When strategy really works! 👉 Yet another proof that the right market approach = stable profit! Less emotion, more cold calculation, solid risk management – and here’s the result! Trading is not gambling, it’s a strategy. If you’re still burning your deposit on emotions, it’s time to change tactics! Want the same results? 📥 Contact me: @Sargis_pro Just write: “Tell me more” and let’s get started!
👏8❤4
✨ It's great when you can do what you love and not spend a lot of time on it and even better when it brings profit 💰 😌 I always enjoy receiving feedback from you and seeing your activity on the channel. Make sure you do too 👑 💬 Write me «Want to join» to start. 🚀 My Contact: @Sargis_pro
🔥12❤7👍4👏3
💵💵💵💵💵 👉 I want to remind about the story when one of the VIP channel members achieved this by starting with $80 and turning it into $400. 🔥How he did it: • He stopped fearing large deposits and started increasing volumes. • Followed my recommendations precisely. • Used the trades from the VIP channel, which brought him this profit. ✍️ Conclusion: he used to see a large balance as a risk, but now he understands …
🔥7❤3
⭕️Do you want to make your first deal on my signal in the VIP channel? 🔤I promise - this will be the moment when you will realize: there is no turning back. ➕Profits will grow daily and you will be able to increase your balance in my VIP CHANNEL. Message to get started! 📥 Contact me: @Sargis_pro
⚡7🆒5❤4👍3🎉2
✨ It's great when you can do what you love and not spend a lot of time on it and even better when it brings profit 💰 😌 I always enjoy receiving feedback from you and seeing your activity on the channel. Make sure you do too 👑 💬 Write me «Want to join» to start. 🚀 My Contact: @Sargis_pro
🎉15🆒3❤2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @tradersroom_reviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,502,154 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trader's room | Reviews” (@tradersroom_reviews), 108 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradersroom_reviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.