Complete 60+ reaction for public session β
β€30π10π10π6π₯5π₯°4β€βπ₯3πΏ3

Channel
@tradermafiaa1
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
83subscribers
-10,524 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001925282841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradermafiaa1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradermafiaa1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 83 | -10,532 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 10,615 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 10,612 | +20 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 10,592 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 10,588 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 10,597 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 10,607 | first reading |
84 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (14 August 2026 β 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,827 |
| Reactions total | 4,915 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 01:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4,915 reactions across 80 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 1,117 | 22.7% | |
| β€ | 633 | 12.9% | |
| π₯° | 579 | 11.8% | |
| π | 557 | 11.3% | |
| π | 528 | 10.7% | |
| π | 479 | 9.75% | |
| π | 102 | 2.08% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 97 | 1.97% | |
| π | 95 | 1.93% | |
| πΏ | 94 | 1.91% | |
| π«‘ | 92 | 1.87% | |
| πΎ | 89 | 1.81% | |
| π | 89 | 1.81% | |
| π | 81 | 1.65% | |
| π | 77 | 1.57% | |
| β‘ | 71 | 1.44% | |
| π | 71 | 1.44% | |
| π― | 64 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 4,915reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Complete 60+ reaction for public session β
β€30π10π10π6π₯5π₯°4β€βπ₯3πΏ3
Live stream finished (29 minutes)
Sticker, posted without a caption
π₯°18π11β€9π₯9π5β€βπ₯4πΏ4π4
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯°15π9π7π6β€5πΏ5π4π3
Photo, posted without a caption
β€10π8π₯°8π7π6β‘5π5π―5
Boom vai....π₯
π11π8π₯°8π8π4π«‘4π4β€3
Photo, posted without a caption
π10π9π₯°9π9β€6π«‘5π3π―3
Share feedback @tradermafia1β
π₯°13β€9π7π6πΎ4π4π₯4π4
BACK TO BACK 3 SURESHOT winβ
π13β€10π8π7π₯°5π5β€βπ₯4π2
Sticker, posted without a caption
π13β€7πΎ7π₯°7π5β‘4π4π3
Sticker, posted without a caption
π9β€8π8π7π7π₯°6β‘5π―5
Sticker, posted without a caption
π12π₯°11β€9π8π«‘6π6β€βπ₯4π4
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @tradermafiaa1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,481,757 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βMafiaβs personal paradise πβ (@tradermafiaa1), 83 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradermafiaa1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.