ICT works. SMC works. CRT works. S&R works. S&D works. Order flow works. Chart patterns work. Candlestick patterns work. Fibonacci works. Trendlines work. EMAs work. MACD works. RSI works. A good enough trader can make any strategy work. That. Is. A. Fact. ✅@futures

Channel
UDO’S WINNERS CIRCLE
@tradecraftinc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002188040490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradecraftinc |
| Description | ‘Crafting the bullish future together’ @phizzybaby |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradecraftinc |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 9 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 7 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 150
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 10
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
I’ve been away for a bit. Truth is, trading hasn’t been easy. It’s been one of those periods where everything feels heavy and uncertain, so I chose to step back and work quietly. Not everything needs to be shown. Not all progress is visible. Sometimes the real growth happens when no one is watching. I’m getting back to using this channel for what it was meant for documenting the journey as it is.
Yooo✨
For questions and enquires @phizzybaby
Posted without readable text
Channel name was changed to «UDO’S WINNERS CIRCLE»
🦁 How To Trade Like A Lion A lone lion usually has a hunting success rate of only 15%. Though during a night hunt, their success rate can climb over 40%. In areas with tall grass, they manage a success rate of over 50% because they are able to get much closer to their prey before striking = manage their risk, trade their edge, and once in the trade go for the jugular. –Shane Yates Even though lions are the king of…
✨
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🍻
📈✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tradecraftinc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UDO’S WINNERS CIRCLE” (@tradecraftinc), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradecraftinc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.