Channel
@tradeblog7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
37subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001700769958 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradeblog7 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 25 September 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradeblog7 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 37 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 38 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 38 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23 | 42.6% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 20.4% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 18.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2022 to 27 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
То, что DOGE тыкается туда-сюда за битком, это мне не интересно, я жду импульс конкретно от этой монеты, который уже давно зреет. Такой же, который был от REEF, лимитку которого мы едва не зацепили, такой же, как от GMT, 25% позы которого ушли в короткий осторожный стоп. С началом блохинга стал осторожничать, и зря, тогда и на REEF офигенный профит был, и GMT остаток в хороший + закрылся бы. Выводы сделаны. Жду собак…
👍9⚡4🔥3🤔1
Ну надо так надо, Паш.
🤔2
Photo, posted without a caption
20400-20500 забрать было бы крайне логичным мувом. Кингфишер рисует хорошее скопление стопов шортистов в этой зоне.
🤔2
СнП рушится, бтц держится, либо нас всех постигнет глубочайшее разочарование с мощным шмяком, либо же кто-то активно лутает биточки по текущим ценам. Раз уж пошли наверх, не лишним будет слизать ликвидность на 20400-20500. Собаку держим, указанные цели 0.064, 0.066 возьмёт. То, что мы вышли за рэйндж набора - не входило в мои планы, но стоп пробить мне видится с такой же вероятностью, с которой мне обломится с меган …
❤🔥3
ALGO закрывайте в плюс. Четверть GMT ушла по стопу, общий трейд в плюс (половину скинули в +20%, четверть в +50, четверть в -50. Волна по ГМТ должна была захватить и второй ТП, но не доехали, увы, откатились на стоп), Доге спокойно держим, с собак спросим по максимуму 😏 Лимитки на ALGO не снимаем, прокатимся еще раз.
👍5
Пока не пошли забирать тейк-доги, можно посмотреть свежего Сатоши #сливслёзысатоши
👍3
3.5 часа болтались в четко обозначенной зоне добора - 0.0615-0.0625. Откройте график и отметьте мою ювелирную точность.
❤🔥3
Мы должны были докатиться до 18815. Посмотрите на график.
Скоро рванётЪ
🤔6
Ладно, я был неправ. Держим до тейков 😂
🔥3
Торговля в данный период отображена на картинке. Отметьте, как вовремя скинули позу по собакам.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tradeblog7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💰👉ТОП-сигналы на фьючи” (@tradeblog7), 37 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradeblog7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.