10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,831–2,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 05:03
2,843
+5
26 Aug 2026, 07:14
2,838
+2
23 Aug 2026, 03:12
2,836
-17
19 Aug 2026, 07:32
2,853
+2
16 Aug 2026, 07:23
2,851
-18
12 Aug 2026, 16:24
2,869
-3
9 Aug 2026, 23:36
2,872
+3
7 Aug 2026, 01:16
2,869
+4
6 Aug 2026, 05:05
2,865
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:20
2,865
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.60%
avg views ÷ 2,843 subscribers
Avg views / post
273
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
23 (17 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,638
Reactions total
133
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
541 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
193
35.7%
🔥
174
32.2%
👍
150
27.7%
🙏
10
1.85%
🤔
6
1.11%
👏
5
0.924%
😁
3
0.555%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вечный спор всех, кто изучает турецкий (или любой другой иностранный язык)
Что эффективнее для разговорной речи?
💛 Сначала мысленно собрать идеальное предложение, проверить все времена, аффиксы, и только потом открыть рот 🫣
💛 Говорить сразу, невзирая на ошибки, помогать себе руками, мимикой, главное — выдать мысль 🗣
Определюсь сразу – я за вариант В. И вот почему
…
❓❓❓
В комментах ко вчерашней публикации обсуждался вопрос, в какой форме лучше использовать глагол unutmak для перевода предложения Я забыл(а) дома кошелёк.
Конкурировали три варианта:
unut-tu-m, unut-muş-um, unut-muş-tu-m
Все они переводятся как я забыл(а), но используются в разных ситуациях.
1️⃣ Unuttum (Прошедшее категорическое время)
Используем, если то, что мы забыли вещь, очевидно, и мы точно помним этот мом…
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❗️
Если вы что-то забыли, опоздали, получили неприятное известие или внезапно осознали, что назревает проблема, вам не обойтись без этого слова-междометия 😨
Eyvah – это эмоциональное междометие, которое переводится как Ой! / О нет! / Эх! / Вот ведь! / Увы! / Ах! / Блин!
Слово пришло в турецкий язык из персидского (ayvāh).
➡️ выражает эмоции сожаления, досады при столкновении с неожиданной и неприятной ситуац…
Для русскоязычного человека бывает сложно почувствовать разницу между прошедшим совершённым и прошедшим продолженным временами (Geçmiş zaman ve Şimdiki zamanın hikayesi).
Разберёмся на примере 😐
Переведём: Всю ночь шёл дождь.
Можно предложить 2 варианта:
1️⃣ Bütün gece yağmur yağdı (Geçmiş Zaman)
2️⃣ Bütün gece yağmur yağıyordu (Şimdiki Zamanın Hikayesi)
Какой вариант вы считаете правильным? Сделайте ваш выбор, пре…
😊😊😊😊
Вновь приветствую всех друзей турецкого языка на нашем канале «Турецкий день за днём».
Благодарю всех, кто остался со мной, несмотря на почти месячное отсутствие публикаций 🙏
Канал возобновляет работу 🥳
Спасибо моему админу 🙏
Попутно сообщаю, что с начала сентября открываю новые онлайн группы, в которые начинаю предварительную запись.
1. Группа А0-А1 (3 месяца)
2. Группа А2 (3 месяца)
3. Группа разговорного турецкого (на минимальной базе от А1 и далее) - экспериментальный курс для тех, кто учил грамматику, но не заговорил (2 месяца)
Орг. информация и программы курсов заинтересованным вышлю через личные сообщения.
Для более продвинутых в…
Доброго дня всем друзьям турецкого языка 😊
Получила в личку несколько обеспокоенных сообщений и поняла, что необходимо объяснить длительное отсутствие новых постов.
Я не забросила канал и в мыслях не держу. Причина техническая. По семейным обстоятельствам пришлось уехать на родину. Выход в Телеграм пока что могу осуществлять только с телефона, а для оформления поста нужен выход с ноутбука.
Если мне удастся решить эту…
ESKİDEN 🆚️🤽♂➖⤵️➡️ ÖNCEDEN: fark nedir?
Оба слова связаны с прошлым, но обозначают разные вещи.
ESKİDEN 🤽♂ раньше, в прежние времена
Говорим о длительном периоде в прошлом, привычках, образе жизни.
➡️Eskiden burada deniz vardı. Раньше здесь было море.
➡️Eskiden çok kitap okurdum. Раньше я много читал(а).
➡️Eskiden insanlar daha az telefon kullanıyordu. Раньше люди меньше пользовались телефонами.
⤵️
Можно мысл…
BİLMEK 🆚️ TANIMAK: fark nedir?
Оба глагола часто переводятся на русский как «знать», но обозначают совершенно разные вещи.
Bilmek ➡️знать ответ, информацию, факт, умение что-то делать
То есть речь идёт о знаниях.
⤵️
▶️Bunun cevabını biliyorum. ➡️ Я знаю ответ на это.
▶️Türkçe biliyor musun? ➡️ Ты знаешь турецкий язык?
▶️Adresini bilmiyorum. ➡️ Я не знаю его адрес.
▶️Yüzmeyi biliyor. ➡️ Он умеет плавать (знае…
Друзья турецкого языка!
Сегодня хочу поделиться книгой, которая, как мне кажется, заслуживает внимания тех, кто уже вышел за рамки стандартных учебников и хочет начать читать настоящую турецкую литературу.
Это сборник рассказов Сезаи Сами-пашазаде с комментариями и языковой поддержкой для изучающих турецкий язык 😮
Мне понравилась сама идея этого издания.
Это не просто сборник рассказов. Здесь оригинальный текст со…
👍17🤔3
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @tr_hergun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы общаетесь на турецком?
Выберите то, что вам больше подходит.
Или напишите свой вариант в комментарии.
Долго соображаю, но говорю правильно11%
Говорю сразу, игнорируя ошибки30%
Чаще просто молчу и стесняюсь20%
Сначала перевожу всю фразу в голове21%
Всё понимаю, но сказать не могу 🐕13%
Помогаю себе активной жестикуляцией5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,040,256 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТУРЕЦКИЙ ДЕНЬ ЗА ДНЁМ” (@tr_hergun), 2,843 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tr_hergun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.