Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ТОВАР ЗА 50 %

Channel

ТОВАР ЗА 50 %

@tovar_za_50

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

2,413subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001363029509
TypeChannel
Username@tovar_za_50
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tovar_za_50

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tovar_za_50/2381 · this entry12 Jun 2026, 12:48 UTC@kupitapple/117612 Jun 2026, 12:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@kupitapple/117724 Jun 2026, 15:39 UTC@tovar_za_50/2386 · this entry24 Jun 2026, 15:39 UTC1.00under a minute
@tovar_za_50/2388 · this entry1 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC@kupitapple/11791 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@tovar_za_50/2391 · this entry9 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC@kupitapple/11829 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@tovar_za_50/2393 · this entry10 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC@kupitapple/118410 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@tovar_za_50/2394 · this entry12 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC@kupitapple/118512 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kupitapple7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (43)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 June 2026 to 21 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @tovar_za_50 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,4132,4152,4146 August 2026 — 2,415 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,415 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,414 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,413 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 28 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,413–2,415 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 00:342,413-1
19 Aug 2026, 03:442,414-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:322,415no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:292,415first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6764.4%
👍2120.2%
🔥1615.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый довольный отзыв от нашего клиента!

21 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC5 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🖥️ MacBook Air 13 (2025, M4) (10CPU / 8GPU / 16 / 256GB): • Midnight — 46 680 ₽ • Silver — 46 740 ₽ • Sky Blue — 46 740 ₽ • Starlight — 46 620 ₽ (10CPU / 10GPU / 16 / 512GB): • Midnight — 58 800 ₽ • Silver — 58 500 ₽ • Sky Blue — 58 200 ₽ • Starlight — 58 200 ₽ (10CPU / 10GPU / 24 / 512GB): • Sky Blue — 73 200 ₽ • Midnight — 67 200 ₽ • Starlight — 66 900 ₽ (10CPU / 10GPU / 24 / 1TB): • Midnight — 104 400 ₽ • Silve

3👍1

18 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC1 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый довольный отзыв от нашего клиента!

3

12 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC5 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отличный телефон, все как в описании. Доставка была примерно 2-3 дня до Москвы, пришел во время. Оригинальный, не первый раз беру у этого продавца. Рекомендую. Телефон весьма шустрый, с переносом данных не возникло никаких проблем. В этой модели есть всевозможные фишки для обработки снимков, все ярко и красочно. Цвет очень красивый - как мандаринка :) Пользуюсь чуть больше недели, нареканий нет.

2👍2🔥2

12 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC11 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Только самые лучшие цены на все iPhone 17 линейки 🔥 📱 17 256Gb — 43.000 ₽ 📱 17 512Gb — 46.200 ₽ 📱 17 Air 256Gb — 39.200 ₽ 📱 17 Air 256Gb — 39.200 ₽ 📱 17 Air 256Gb — 39.200 ₽ 📱 17 Air 256Gb — 37.400 ₽ 📱 17 Pro 256 Orange — 61.500 ₽ 📱 17 Pro 256 Blue — 62.900 ₽ 📱 17 Pro 256 Silver — 62.500 ₽ 📱 17 Pro 512 Orange — 63.700 ₽ 📱 17 Pro 512 Blue — 62.900 ₽ 📱 17 Pro 512 Silver — 63.600 ₽ 📱 17 Pro 1TB Orange — 68.100

2👍2🔥2

10 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC14 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥СТАРТ ПРОДАЖ НА 5 КОМПЛЕКТОВ🔥 iPhone 17 (чёрный/зеленый/фиолетовый/белый) + AirPods Pro 2 256GB - 20.180р 512GB - 22.350р Оригинал. Абсолютно новые. Запечатанные. Гарантия 12 месяцев по чеку.

9

9 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC4 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый довольный отзыв от нашего клиента!

1

9 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC5 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Предложение дня 🔥 успевайте iPhone 17 256 Black (sim+esim) 🏷 39.990₽ iPhone 17 256 White (sim+esim) 🏷 39.500₽ Стоимость указана за безналичный расчет 🤍 Гарантия от магазина 1 год

2

1 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC4 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый довольный отзыв от нашего клиента!

2👍2

1 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC9 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ СТАРТ ПРОДАЖ! ВСЕГО 5 ШТУК! 📱 iPhone 17 Pro (256GB, sim+esim) — 20 500₽ 📱 iPhone 17 Pro Max (256GB, sim+esim) — 21 000₽ 📱 iPhone 17 Pro Max (512GB, sim+esim) — 24 300₽ Цвета: Оранжевый, Серый, Синий 🔵Оригинал. Новые, в заводской упаковке (не активированы). 🔵Официальная гарантия — 1 год по чеку.

👍32

24 Jun 2026, 15:53 UTC5 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый довольный отзыв от нашего клиента!

🔥54👍4

24 Jun 2026, 15:39 UTC16 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥ПРОДАЖИ ОТКРЫТЫ НА 10 УСТРОЙСТВ🔥 Apple iPhone 17 Pro (оранжевый/серый/синий) 256GB (sim-esim) - 22.050р 512GB (sim-esim) - 24.600р Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (оранжевый/серый/синий) 512GB (sim-esim) - 28.550р 1TB (sim-esim) - 30.950р Новые, с пломбами, гарантия 12 месяцев по чеку!

4👍4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tovar_za_50. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТОВАР ЗА 50 %” (@tovar_za_50), 2,413 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tovar_za_50.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.