Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐓𝐎𝐕𝐀 ✿⁠ 𝟏𝟖+

@tovaart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,716subscribers

+59 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001416020348
TypeChannel
Username@tovaart
Created13 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tovaart

Growth

3,6573,7163,686.56 August 2026 — 3,657 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,664 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,665 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,716 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,648–3,725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:133,716+51
10 Aug 2026, 12:213,665+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:013,664+7
6 Aug 2026, 08:493,657first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 3,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
704
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,453
Reactions total1,267
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,267 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓57145.1%
custom 534378429090996662554643.1%
🕊15011.8%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,267reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tovaart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC120 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бывает сидишь в час ночи, рисуешь и внезапно получается как-то по-новому и лучше чем обычно, но ты не понял, как так вышло 👁👁

custom 534378429090996662532🕊9🍓6

7 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC247 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alhyde6Photo

👊меня надо изолировать от общества

custom 534378429090996662534🍓27🕊13

7 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC430 views171 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍓 ❤️ 🥺 ❤️ 🍓 Ложечку БДСМчика за паапу

🍓107custom 534378429090996662539🕊25

7 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC534 views116 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Никогда не хотели скушать Люцифера? Или может Радиостатиков? Это поправимо 🍎🤍🍎🤍🍎🤍🍎🤍🍎 Я уверенно двигаюсь к тому, чтобы превратить всё своё творчество в кондитерскую пхх 🍓🩵🍓🩵🍓🩵🍓🩵🍓 По идее, когда всё высохнет, оно будет носибельным, но я пока боюсь давать обещания, пока просто посмотрите, какая я молодец <⁠(⁠ ̄⁠︶⁠ ̄⁠)⁠> всё ещё открыты предзакази

🍓74custom 534378429090996662533🕊9

6 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC539 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BANANABABY65Photo

👐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩 🕳️🕳️🕳️🤩🤩⭐⭐⭐ 🕳️🕳️🕳️🤩🤩⭐⭐🌟 🕳️🕳️🕳️🤩🍵🍵🍵🤍🖤 🚬🚬🚬🔌🍵🍵🌟🪓 🚬🚬🚬🍵🍵🍵🍵😭😏 🤩🤩🤩🍵🍵🍵🍵🌟 🤩🤩🌟🌟🤩🕷️🌟🩸😅 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🔺🔵◾️🔸 Буду рада видеть ваши комментарии и благодарна за репосты 🍓

🍓33🕊4

6 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈2,330 views147 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🩷🎀 🩷 🎀🩷🎀🎀 Иногда практикую безлайн для вайба, получилось здорово, кажется :3 (это полустадик, реф в комментах оставлю как проснусь, либо в Твиттере уже есть, если очень интересно) 🪽🪽🩵🪽 🩵 🪽🩵🪽🪽 Как же нравится мне рисовать всякие крем, тортики, клубнички🍓 сейчас открыты предзаказы

custom 534378429090996662592🍓42🕊13

5 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC645 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уии я теперь есть на Лисьей полке, очень люблю станцию метро Бауманская, она уютная 🦌🦌🦌

🍓67custom 534378429090996662528🕊16

5 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC667 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Немного рандомного из маленького скетчбука. Тут новые только Радиостатики, остальное просто решила показать для веселья. 🙂 Я всё, я возобновляю привычку вести скетчбуки, в жизни существует такая радость, а я ей пренебрегаю, на плаху меня, если не исправлюсь 😊👍

🍓58custom 534378429090996662527🕊14

4 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC715 views161 reactions20 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ножки Воксика были заштрихованы с особой нежностью (⁠ ⁠ꈍ⁠ᴗ⁠ꈍ⁠)

custom 5343784290909966625106🍓41🕊14

4 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC738 views119 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добри утрищка Немножко хвастаюсь своим сетапом, совсееееем чуть-чуть 👉 🥹 Ну и по совместительству спойлерю немного кое что. В утренней молитве обязательно упомяните, чтобы я закончила комикс, а то в Айпаде таких уже штук 6 валяется (они правда почти все порно, поэтому и страшно заканчивать пхххххх)

🍓76custom 534378429090996662527🕊16

3 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC746 views150 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всё, это мой маскот Товик ЛУЧШЕ НЕ БУДЕТ, ЭТО ПРАЙМОВЫЙ МАСКОТ!!! Я ЛУЧШЕ НЕ ПРИДУМАЮ НИКОГДА, ЭТО НЕВОЗМОЖНО!!! Всем любить Товика

custom 534378429090996662593🍓40🕊17

3 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC742 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Небольшая напоминалочка о том, что онлайн-заказы открыты до 19 августа :3 🤩🤩🤩 Несколько интересных фактов о мерче в предзаказах с фото: 🤩Плюшевые ВоксАльчики - это не просто круглые плюшки, а значки 58 мм, которые оч круто смотрятся в ито-бэге, я видела у одной папищицы на маркете, которая их успела купить в самой первой пробной партии 🤩Морвей с крыльями должен был быть 6 см в высоту, но китайцы, которые его мне пе

custom 534378429090996662535

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tovaart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 7,641 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐓𝐎𝐕𝐀 ✿⁠ 𝟏𝟖+” (@tovaart), 3,716 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tovaart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.