Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ready Player One💠 Calls

@touhaody

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,096subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001229075356
TypeChannel
Username@touhaody
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/touhaody

Growth

2,0962,1272,111.57 August 2026 — 2,127 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,127 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,108 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,096 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,091–2,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:582,096-12
10 Aug 2026, 19:312,108-19
7 Aug 2026, 09:312,127no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:282,127first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 2,096 subscribers
Avg views / post
442
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.314%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held18 (5 January 202630 July 2026)
Views total1,325
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1083.3%
👍18.33%
🔥18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC310 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

0x70df5363309ca2c535f839991ebecb6f91137777 错过火星币别错过火星城 0xfe189e97832da1573e4e4ff034f4ffc3a15c7777 火星币已经卖飞 怎么就阿尔法了😂😂😂

29 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC326 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

中本聪叙事 0x703429782b86b24de7d972a4eff4108451547777 蝴蝶的有分btc 0xbfc9f4adf160cf194d48c8dfb9103d6bc6a84444 FOUR两个都买

2

10 Jun 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,850 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️ 球哈体育⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚽世界杯官方指定平台⚽ ☺️🥹😛🥹❤️😄😳😚🙁😞 💴首存100+送100💴 支付宝/微信/USDT/存取方便安全快捷 极速到账,24小时在线客服服务, 20年老台,单日最高可提100万, ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️球哈官网:qh122.com 💥世界杯-当日充值叠加任何活动 💥世界杯-当日亏损发放救援金 💥世界杯-推荐好友拿当日累计6% ⚡️❤️❤️❤️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡⚡⚡

21 May 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/NIU13DAO 号称牛逼 观察下 晚上开盘

12 May 2026, 18:44 UTC≈1,550 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ETH SATO 把 BTC 式稀缺曲线带到 Hook。 WEI 做的是 Ethereum 原生的货币曲线。 把wei / gwei / gas / base fee burn / EIP-1559压缩进hook的eth文化符号。 ETH 进入,WEI 形成。 WEI 退出,ETH 返回。 需求推深储备,储备推高价格,交互触发 1559 Burn Path。 1B WEI 不是随机总量,而是来自 1 gwei = 10^9 wei 的 ETH 单位文化。 上限固定,流通动态 https://www.0xwei.com/ 合约: 0xbf22c716169b057e07efdf7a57aac881259127a5

1

31 Mar 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,390 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

这个等4.6链接出来打吧。地面肯定是地面 拉布布的一些团队 没有项目能让我在频道推好些天。pvp不行,那么跟盘圈走走看…

2👍1🔥1

31 Jan 2026, 07:05 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

0xd9191c26045b88c6fe66489eb48fb396a4827777 回调看着买进吧 骐骥 TG: https://t.me/qj2026bnb QQ: 122712547

29 Jan 2026, 15:09 UTC≈2,460 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

明天大战。频道通知起来。评论留言或许有惊喜。🧧

4

28 Jan 2026, 14:44 UTC≈2,350 viewsread 7 August 2026

这个qq群会有一个大ca,有兴趣去蹲蹲,122712547

27 Jan 2026, 23:03 UTC≈2,320 viewsread 7 August 2026

打开频道的通知📢 或许…………你懂的😏

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @touhaody. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,183,805 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ready Player One💠 Calls” (@touhaody), 2,096 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/touhaody.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.