Channel

@toucu 偷醋投促

@touchi1

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002743069991
Type	Channel
Usernames	@touchi1 @toucu
Description	28# @vip8690
Created	8 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	13 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/touchi1

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
13 Aug 2026, 18:39	3	no change
13 Aug 2026, 10:30	3	first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 8 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 3
Links: 2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,050,243 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

@sangren 桑仁桑人
@sangren · 22 posts 百畅白鲳
@baichangbot · 21 post NFT @chuangyang 创阳
@chuangyang · 21 post NFT @daojiong 刀囧岛囧
@daojiong · 21 post NFT @deben 德本
@deben_bot · 41 post NFT @ganchuang 敢闯
@ganchuang · 31 post NFT @gangjiong 港囧
@gangjiong1 · 21 post @huotun 活吞
@huotunbot · 21 post NFT @kuangzhang 矿长
@kuangzhang · 21 post @laigang 来港
@laigang1 · 41 post @laolue 老略
@laolue · 21 post @laosang 老桑
@laosangbot · 21 post @laoshuo 老说老烁
@laoshuo1 · 31 post @nudeng 努登
@nudeng1 · 21 post NFT @oulao 欧老
@oulaobot · 21 post 巧彤。 @qiaotong
@qiaotong_bot · 21 post NFT @shaotang 少糖少棠
@shaotang8 · 21 post NFT @sizou 四走
@sizou1 · 31 post @taihuai 太坏
@taihuaibot · 21 post @tuanxing 团星团兴
@tuanxing1 · 21 post NFT @weican 围餐伟灿
@weicanbot · 31 post NFT @yinkeng 银坑
@yinkeng · 21 post @zhuanzuan 赚赚赚钻
@zhuanzuanbot · 31 post 猪拐
@zhuguaibot · 21 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

NFT @bintian 滨田殡天
@bintian1 · 21 post NFT @chuangwai 窗外
@chuangwai1 · 21 post NFT @daojiong 刀囧岛囧
@daojiong · 21 post NFT @deben 德本
@deben_bot · 41 post NFT @ganchuang 敢闯
@ganchuang · 31 post @huinuo 汇诺慧诺
@huinuo1 · 21 post @jiangle 将乐
@jiangle3 · 31 post @juanying 卷赢
@juanying1 · 21 post NFT @kuangzhang 矿长
@kuangzhang · 21 post @laigang 来港
@laigang1 · 41 post NFT @laoshuang 老爽
@laoshuang1 · 21 post @laoshuo 老说老烁
@laoshuo1 · 31 post 用户名NFT🆔官网直拍。
@nft899 · 1221 post @nudeng 努登
@nudeng1 · 21 post @ranfeng 冉风然峰
@ranfeng8 · 31 post NFT @shaotang 少糖少棠
@shaotang8 · 21 post NFT @sizou 四走
@sizou1 · 31 post NFT @taozuan 陶钻
@taozuan1 · 21 post 骚名用户名NFT任选🆔
@tg8tg · 2951 post @tuanxing 团星团兴
@tuanxing1 · 21 post NFT @weican 围餐伟灿
@weicanbot · 31 post NFT @xuantie 玄铁炫贴
@xuantie1 · 21 post NFT @yinkeng 银坑
@yinkeng · 21 post @zhuanzuan 赚赚赚钻
@zhuanzuanbot · 31 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 2; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 2; vacant every time we have ever looked

@touchi1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@gaoxie
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026

@juchong
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@toucu 偷醋投促” (@touchi1), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/touchi1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.

@toucu 偷醋 投促